100 Netherland Lane, Kingsport, TN 37660 (opens Google Maps) · Sullivan County · (423) 849-0500· 67 certified beds · avg 34 residents/day · certified since Dec 8, 2005 · Medicare only — not Medicaid certified
Certified for Medicare only. Medicare pays for short rehabilitation stays, not for long-term care — and this facility cannot bill Medicaid, which is what most families rely on for a long stay. Ask what a long-term stay here would cost and how it would be paid for. Who pays for nursing home care →
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Showing the latest 3 of 10 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered. F-0582
The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · from a complaint F-0658
The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. F-0761
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 1, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered. · F-0582 |
| Apr 1, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · from a complaint · F-0658 |
| Apr 1, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Apr 1, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint · F-0842 |
| Apr 24, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint · F-0609 |
| May 24, 2023 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| May 24, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not dispose of garbage and refuse properly. · F-0814 |
| May 24, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| May 24, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep all essential equipment working safely — things like heating and cooling systems, kitchen equipment, and medical devices. · F-0908 |
| Jan 8, 2020 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. · F-0760 |
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (4 → 2).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | 1 | 0 | D |
| 2023 | 4 | 0 | F |
| 2024 | 1 | 0 | D |
| 2026 | 4 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
5 fines totaling $23,604.
Every penalty CMS publishes for this facility in the 3-year window is listed —none excluded. The count and the dollar total come from two different CMS datasets and agree for this facility. Penalties older than the window are dropped by CMS before publication, not by us.
| Date | Type | Amount / length |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 20, 2024 | Fine | $4,178 |
| Feb 12, 2024 | Fine | $3,798 |
| Jan 22, 2024 | Fine | $9,116 |
| Jan 8, 2024 | Fine | $2,279 |
| Dec 18, 2023 | Fine | $4,233 |
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Tennessee avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.13 | 3.62 | 3.95 | bottom 24% in Tennessee; bottom 18% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.78 | 0.57 | 0.69 | top 15% in Tennessee; top 29% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 2.87 | 3.15 | 3.50 | bottom 38% in Tennessee; bottom 24% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.59 | 0.39 | 0.48 | top 12% in Tennessee; top 24% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 34.5 | 48.9 | 45.8 | top 13% in Tennessee; top 23% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 0.0 | 43.2 | 42.9 | top 1% in Tennessee; top 1% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.48, RN 0.87, weekend 3.18.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.48 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 3/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Asbury Place Kingsport. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership Data Not Available |
All 1 owning or managing party CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Orchardview Post-Acute and Rehabilitation Center | 4.1 mi | Kingsport, TN | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Nova Health and Rehab | 5.2 mi | Weber City, VA | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| NHC Healthcare, Kingsport | 5.8 mi | Kingsport, TN | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Wexford House | 6.1 mi | Kingsport, TN | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Holston Rehabilitation and Care Center | 6.4 mi | Kingsport, TN | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Church Hill Post-Acute and Rehabilitation Center | 6.8 mi | Church Hill, TN | —/5 | SFF | |
| Greystone Health Care Center | 12.3 mi | Blountville, TN | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Life Care Center of Gray | 14.3 mi | Gray, TN | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Ridgecrest Manor Nursing & Rehabilitation | 15.6 mi | Duffield, VA | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Waters of Bristol a Rehabilitation and Nursing | 18.2 mi | Blountville, TN | ★★★★☆ | 5/5 | |
| NHC Healthcare, Johnson City | 18.5 mi | Johnson City, TN | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| The Waters of Johnson City, LLC | 19.4 mi | Johnson City, TN | ★★☆☆☆ | 3/5 |
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 445481.
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details