TexasFort Worth

Ridgmar Medical Lodge

6600 Lands End Court, Fort Worth, TX 76116 · Tarrant County · 155 certified beds · avg 70 residents/day · certified since Mar 11, 2006

Part of chain: PRIORITY MANAGEMENT (38 facilities, chain avg rating 2.9★)

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
4
Serious findings on record
$29,598
Fines, last 3 years
3.05
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Aug 14, 2025 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Jul 24, 2025 (Past Non-Compliance)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Mar 13, 2024 · F-0600 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.

Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Mar 14, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Mar 13, 2024 · F-0656 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.

Why it matters: Without a complete, working care plan, important needs can slip through the cracks and no one is accountable for results.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Mar 14, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Nov 14, 2024 · F-0925

The facility did not maintain an effective pest control program to prevent or deal with mice, insects, or other pests.

Why it matters: Pests spread germs, contaminate food, and signal broader problems with cleanliness.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Jan 3, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (32)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Apr 15, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Feb 20, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Feb 20, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
Feb 20, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' right to share a room with their spouse or a roommate of their choosing, or moved residents to a different room without written notice beforehand.
Feb 20, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Aug 14, 2025▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Aug 14, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need. · from a complaint
Apr 8, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide necessary behavioral health care and services — support for residents' mental and emotional wellbeing, including conditions like depression and anxiety. · from a complaint
Nov 14, 2024▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not maintain an effective pest control program to prevent or deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
Nov 14, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need. · from a complaint
Nov 14, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedWhen a resident had a planned discharge, the facility did not make sure the necessary information was communicated to the resident and to the doctors or facility taking over their care.
Nov 14, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes. · from a complaint
Nov 14, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. · from a complaint
Nov 14, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection. · from a complaint
Nov 14, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Nov 14, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Nov 14, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · from a complaint
Nov 14, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint
Nov 14, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician. · from a complaint
Nov 14, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not arrange hospice services for a resident who needed them, or help the resident move to a facility that could arrange hospice. Hospice provides comfort-focused care for people nearing the end of life.
May 29, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility transferred or discharged a resident without a valid reason, or failed to provide the required documentation and information when moving a resident out. · from a complaint
May 29, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal. · from a complaint
Mar 13, 2024▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Mar 13, 2024▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint
Oct 12, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle.
Oct 12, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Oct 12, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with respect and dignity, or did not let them keep and use their own personal belongings.
Oct 12, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' right to voice complaints without discrimination or retaliation, or did not have a working complaint process that resolves issues promptly.
Oct 12, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes.
Oct 12, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Oct 4, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint
Oct 4, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (12 → 4).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202380E
2024163J ▲
202531J ▲
202650E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

3 fines totaling $29,598, plus 1 Medicare payment denial period.

DateTypeAmount / length
Aug 14, 2025Fine$10,361
Nov 14, 2024Fine$10,839
Nov 14, 2024Payment Denial13 days from Dec 21, 2024
Mar 13, 2024Fine$8,398

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityTexas avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.053.463.95bottom 26% in Texas; bottom 15% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.480.440.69top 29% in Texas; bottom 35% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing2.643.043.50bottom 25% in Texas; bottom 14% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.470.340.48top 16% in Texas; top 36% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)52.755.345.8bottom 48% in Texas; bottom 30% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)14.354.642.9top 3% in Texas; top 7% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.27, RN 0.52, weekend 2.84. Staffing rating: 2/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5

Who owns this facility

Government - Hospital district

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Decatur Hospital AuthorityOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%12/01/2014
Bauder, WilliamIndividualIndividual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/15/2025
Boulware, DouglasIndividualIndividual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE02/18/2025
Boulware, StevenIndividualIndividual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/15/2025
Bridgepointe Finanical Services, LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2014
Caretrust Reit INCOrganization5% or Greater Mortgage InterestNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2014
Caretrust Reit INCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2014
Ctr Partnership LPOrganization5% or Greater Mortgage InterestNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2014
Ctr Partnership LPOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2014
Dollahite, HenryIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2014
Innovative Nurse Consulting, LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2014
Meharry, DouglasIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE07/22/2024
Meharry, DouglasIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/22/2024
PMG Opco-Ridgmar LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2014
PMG Opco-Ridgmar LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE02/18/2025
Priority Management Group, LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2014
Progressive Rehab Solutions, LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2014
Scroggins, BrianIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2014

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Willow Ridge Wellness & Rehabilitation1.5 miFort Worth, TX★☆☆☆☆1/5
White Settlement Nursing Center1.6 miWhite Settlement, TX★★★☆☆2/5
West Side Campus of Care2.1 miWhite Settlement, TX★☆☆☆☆2/5
Arlington Heights Health and Rehabilitation Center2.4 miFort Worth, TX★☆☆☆☆2/5abuse
Stonegate Nursing and Rehabilitation3.2 miFort Worth, TX★★★★★4/5
Renaissance Park Multi Care Center3.4 miFort Worth, TX★★☆☆☆2/5
Fort Worth Wellness & Rehabilitation4.2 miFort Worth, TX★☆☆☆☆2/5
River Oaks Health and Rehabilitation Center4.5 miFort Worth, TX★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
Benbrook Nursing & Rehabilitation Center4.6 miBenbrook, TX★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
The Stayton at Museum Way4.7 miFort Worth, TX★★★★★4/5
Fort Worth Transitional Care Center4.8 miFort Worth, TX★☆☆☆☆1/5
Cityview Nursing and Rehabilitation Center5.0 miFort Worth, TX★★☆☆☆1/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Fort Worth →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 676101.