How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
1180 West 500 North, Huntington, IN 46750 (opens Google Maps) · Huntington County · (260) 355-2750· 78 certified beds · avg 74 residents/day · certified since Jul 27, 2001 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Abuse citation flag (CMS)
The abuse flag means inspectors cited this facility for abuse that caused harm to a resident within the past year, or potential for harm in each of the last two years. Source: CMS.
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Mar 10, 2026 · F-0600 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.
Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Mar 23, 2026 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
Showing the latest 3 of 16 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint F-0600
The facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. F-0580
The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. F-0609
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 10, 2026 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint · F-0600 |
| Feb 11, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · F-0580 |
| Feb 11, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · F-0609 |
| Feb 11, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable. · F-0655 |
| Feb 11, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Feb 11, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide food that accounts for each resident's allergies, intolerances, and personal preferences, or did not offer appealing alternatives. · F-0806 |
| Feb 11, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not designate a qualified infection preventionist — a trained person responsible for running the infection prevention and control program. · F-0882 |
| Oct 20, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Jan 3, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Jan 3, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677 |
| Jan 3, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Jan 3, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. · F-0758 |
| Jan 3, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Apr 23, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint · F-0684 |
| Feb 26, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care. · F-0578 |
| Feb 26, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (5 → 6).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 3 | 0 | D |
| 2025 | 6 | 0 | E |
| 2026 | 7 | 1 | G ▲ |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Indiana avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 4.38 | 3.42 | 3.95 | top 9% in Indiana; top 27% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.54 | 0.62 | 0.69 | bottom 47% in Indiana; bottom 44% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 4.00 | 3.01 | 3.50 | top 7% in Indiana; top 23% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.41 | 0.47 | 0.48 | top 48% in Indiana; top 46% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 38.2 | 45.9 | 45.8 | top 27% in Indiana; top 32% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 45.5 | 40.4 | 42.9 | bottom 40% in Indiana; bottom 43% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.33, RN 0.54, weekend 3.96.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (4.33 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 4/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Heritage Pointe of Huntington. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
Non profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adams County Memorial Hospital | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2022 |
| Blue Management Services LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2024 |
| Borne-Bauman, Candice | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2022 |
| Borne-Bauman, Candice | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2022 |
| Boxell, Jeffery | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2025 |
| Boxell, Jeffery | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2025 |
| Brothers, Alfred | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2025 |
| Carmer, Toni | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2025 |
| Conner, Steven | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2025 |
| Evergreen Services Group Topco LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2025 |
| Fenstermacher, Marlene | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2025 |
| First Bank of Berne | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2022 |
| Flueckiger, Russell | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2022 |
| Flueckiger, Russell | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2022 |
| Forvis Mazars, LLP | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2025 |
| Forvis Mazars, LLP | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2025 |
| Fullbright, Shelly | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2025 |
| Healthcare Therapy Services INC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2025 |
| Hoy, Marcelline | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2025 |
| Jones, Jeffery | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2025 |
Showing 20 of 47 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 27 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Waters of Huntington Skilled Nursing Facility, the | 2.5 mi | Huntington, IN | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Hickory Creek at Huntington | 2.5 mi | Huntington, IN | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Envive of Huntington | 2.5 mi | Huntington, IN | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Markle Health & Rehabilitation | 11.0 mi | Markle, IN | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Majestic Care of West Allen | 14.9 mi | Fort Wayne, IN | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Timbercrest Church of the Brethren Home | 15.4 mi | North Manchester, IN | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Peabody Retirement Community | 15.4 mi | North Manchester, IN | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Heritage Pointe of Warren | 15.6 mi | Warren, IN | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Coventry Meadows | 17.2 mi | Fort Wayne, IN | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Waters of Columbia City Skilled Nursing Facility | 17.3 mi | Columbia City, IN | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Sage Bluff Health and Rehab Center | 17.3 mi | Fort Wayne, IN | ★★★☆☆ | 4/5 | |
| Autumn Ridge Rehabilitation Centre | 17.3 mi | Wabash, IN | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 |
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 155692.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details