6050 S Cr 800 E 92, Fort Wayne, IN 46814 (opens Google Maps) · Allen County · (260) 625-3545· 96 certified beds · avg 82 residents/day · certified since Aug 15, 1988 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: MAJESTIC CARE (22 facilities, chain avg rating 2.5★)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
▲ Immediate jeopardy, isolated · Mar 9, 2026 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (J): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Mar 4, 2026 (Past Non-Compliance)
Showing the latest 3 of 16 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not provide required paperwork or notices about a resident's needs, their right to appeal a transfer or discharge, or the facility's bed-hold policy (how long a bed is saved during a hospital stay). F-0628
The facility did not provide care that took into account residents' past trauma or their cultural backgrounds. Care is supposed to be sensitive to what residents have lived through and where they come from. F-0699
The facility did not provide appropriate treatment and services to residents with a mental health condition, difficulty adjusting emotionally, or a history of trauma or post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). F-0742
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 16, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide required paperwork or notices about a resident's needs, their right to appeal a transfer or discharge, or the facility's bed-hold policy (how long a bed is saved during a hospital stay). · F-0628 |
| Apr 16, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide care that took into account residents' past trauma or their cultural backgrounds. Care is supposed to be sensitive to what residents have lived through and where they come from. · F-0699 |
| Apr 16, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide appropriate treatment and services to residents with a mental health condition, difficulty adjusting emotionally, or a history of trauma or post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). · F-0742 |
| Apr 16, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · F-0842 |
| Mar 9, 2026 | ▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Jul 25, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| May 8, 2025 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · from a complaint · F-0812 |
| May 8, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677 |
| May 8, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| May 8, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration. · F-0692 |
| May 8, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors. · from a complaint · F-0921 |
| May 8, 2025 | C · Potential for minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not dispose of garbage and refuse properly. · F-0814 |
| Jul 30, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677 |
| Jul 30, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide care that took into account residents' past trauma or their cultural backgrounds. Care is supposed to be sensitive to what residents have lived through and where they come from. · F-0699 |
| Nov 28, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · from a complaint · F-0761 |
| Aug 22, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint · F-0684 |
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (6 → 4).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 2 | 0 | E |
| 2024 | 2 | 0 | D |
| 2025 | 7 | 0 | F |
| 2026 | 5 | 1 | J ▲ |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
1 fine totaling $21,645.
Every penalty CMS publishes for this facility in the 3-year window is listed —none excluded. The count and the dollar total come from two different CMS datasets and agree for this facility. Penalties older than the window are dropped by CMS before publication, not by us.
| Date | Type | Amount / length |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 9, 2026 | Fine | $21,645 |
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Indiana avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 2.82 | 3.42 | 3.95 | bottom 16% in Indiana; bottom 9% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.35 | 0.62 | 0.69 | bottom 10% in Indiana; bottom 15% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 2.45 | 3.01 | 3.50 | bottom 15% in Indiana; bottom 8% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.24 | 0.47 | 0.48 | bottom 11% in Indiana; bottom 20% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 50.7 | 45.9 | 45.8 | bottom 34% in Indiana; bottom 35% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 20.0 | 40.4 | 42.9 | top 14% in Indiana; top 13% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 2.89, RN 0.36, weekend 2.51.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (2.89 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 2/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: —/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Majestic Care of West Allen. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barry, Thomas | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2019 |
| Malott, Gregg | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2015 |
| Pulaski Memorial Hospital | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2015 |
| Rafalski, Rosemarie | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2019 |
| Robbins, Jina | Individual | W-2 Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/18/2016 |
All 5 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
CMS lists this facility under the chain Majestic Care — 22 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 21 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coventry Meadows | 5.6 mi | Fort Wayne, IN | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Sage Bluff Health and Rehab Center | 5.6 mi | Fort Wayne, IN | ★★★☆☆ | 4/5 | |
| Majestic Care of Jefferson Pointe | 6.4 mi | Fort Wayne, IN | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Englewood Health & Rehabilitation Center | 9.0 mi | Fort Wayne, IN | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Waters of Columbia City Skilled Nursing Facility | 10.0 mi | Columbia City, IN | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Kingston Health Center of Fort Wayne | 10.3 mi | Fort Wayne, IN | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Summit City Nursing and Rehabilitation | 10.5 mi | Fort Wayne, IN | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Life Care Center of Fort Wayne | 10.6 mi | Fort Wayne, IN | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Majestic Care of Fort Wayne | 10.9 mi | Fort Wayne, IN | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Glenbrook Rehabilitation & Skilled Nursing Center | 11.2 mi | Fort Wayne, IN | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| University Park Rehabilitation and Healthcare | 11.6 mi | Fort Wayne, IN | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Saint Anne Home | 11.8 mi | Fort Wayne, IN | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Allen, IN — 29 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 155322.
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details