Peabody Retirement Community

Name: Peabody Retirement Community
Address: 400 W SEVENTH ST, North Manchester, IN, 46962, US
Telephone: 2609828616

400 W Seventh St, North Manchester, IN 46962 · Wabash County · 192 certified beds · avg 175 residents/day · certified since Aug 15, 1998

2/5

Health inspection rating (on-site)

Serious findings on record

$22,071

Fines, last 3 years

4.13

Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Jun 7, 2024 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: May 24, 2024 (Past Non-Compliance)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Apr 18, 2024 · F-0744 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not provide the right treatment and services for residents with dementia or signs of dementia. Dementia care requires specific approaches, training, and patience.

Why it matters: Poor dementia care can lead to distress, unsafe wandering, or unnecessary sedating medication.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Apr 19, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (26)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

Date	Severity	What the facility was cited for
Jun 30, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
May 18, 2026	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need.
May 18, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility gave residents unnecessary mind-altering (psychotropic) medications, or used drugs in a way that restrained residents by dulling their ability to think, move, or function.
May 18, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
May 18, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Apr 9, 2025	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Apr 9, 2025	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Apr 9, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Apr 9, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate.
Apr 9, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Apr 9, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Apr 9, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not have a written plan describing how it runs its quality improvement program — the ongoing process of finding problems in care and fixing them.
Nov 25, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Jun 7, 2024	▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-off	The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Jun 7, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
May 1, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
May 1, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
May 1, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide the right treatment and services for residents with dementia or signs of dementia. Dementia care requires specific approaches, training, and patience.
May 1, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
May 1, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
May 1, 2024	C · Minimal risk, facility-wide	The facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day.
May 1, 2024	C · Minimal risk, facility-wide	The facility employed staff who were not licensed, certified, or registered as required by state law.
Apr 18, 2024	▲ G · Actual harm, one-off	The facility did not provide the right treatment and services for residents with dementia or signs of dementia. Dementia care requires specific approaches, training, and patience. · from a complaint
Apr 18, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Jan 19, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not protect residents from misuse of their belongings or money — this is called misappropriation, and it includes theft or improper use of a resident's property or funds. · from a complaint
Aug 23, 2023	F · Potential for harm, facility-wide	The facility did not have a working call system — the button or cord residents use to summon help — in each resident's bathroom and bathing area. · from a complaint

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (7 → 4).

Year	Citations	Serious (G–L)	Worst severity that year
2023	1	0	F
2024	13	2	J ▲
2025	7	0	E
2026	5	0	E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

2 fines totaling $22,071.

Date	Type	Amount / length
Jun 7, 2024	Fine	$12,038
Apr 18, 2024	Fine	$10,033

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

Measure	This facility	Indiana avg	U.S. avg	Where it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)	4.13	3.42	3.95	top 12% in Indiana; top 34% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours	0.40	0.62	0.69	bottom 17% in Indiana; bottom 22% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing	3.85	3.01	3.50	top 10% in Indiana; top 27% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)	0.34	0.47	0.48	bottom 32% in Indiana; bottom 40% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)	54.2	45.9	45.8	bottom 25% in Indiana; bottom 27% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)	45.0	40.4	42.9	bottom 40% in Indiana; bottom 44% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.19, RN 0.40, weekend 3.90. Staffing rating: 3/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Who owns this facility

Non profit - Corporation

Owner / manager	Type	Role	Stake	Since
Woodlawn Hospital	Organization	5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest	100%	10/31/2014
All Points Management LLC	Organization	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	06/01/2021
All Points Management LLC	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	06/01/2021
Allen County Internal Medicine	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	07/01/2015
Ar Solutions LLC	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	11/01/2024
Bode, Glen	Individual	Managing Control - Governing Body	NOT APPLICABLE	12/09/2022
Bode, Glen	Individual	Trustee of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	12/09/2022
Chudzynski, Kendra	Individual	Managing Control - Governing Body	NOT APPLICABLE	10/15/2024
Chudzynski, Kendra	Individual	Trustee of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	10/15/2024
Feuer, Samuel	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	12/12/2022
Fisher, Alan	Individual	Managing Control - Governing Body	NOT APPLICABLE	06/13/2022
Fisher, Alan	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	06/13/2022
Heyde, Alison	Individual	Managing Control - Governing Body	NOT APPLICABLE	09/01/2019
Heyde, Alison	Individual	Trustee of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	09/09/2019
Johnson, Terri	Individual	Managing Control - Governing Body	NOT APPLICABLE	06/13/2022
Johnson, Terri	Individual	Trustee of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	06/13/2022
Katz, Larry	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	12/12/2022
Lahasky, Ephram	Individual	Individual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	12/17/2025
Life Care Services LLC	Organization	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	10/31/2014
Mellinger, Gregory	Individual	Managing Control - Governing Body	NOT APPLICABLE	06/13/2022

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

"What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
"What specific dementia training do your staff receive, and how do you handle difficult moments without medication?"
"How do you make sure each resident's care follows the doctor's orders, and what changed after this citation?"
"How do you identify and arrange specialized services for residents with mental health conditions or disabilities?"
"What percentage of your residents are on antipsychotic or sedating medications, and how do you work to reduce that?"
"Can you tell me what this citation involved and what steps you took to bring care back up to standard?"
"What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
"Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
"What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
"Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

Facility	Distance	City	Overall	Inspection	Flags
Timbercrest Church of the Brethren Home	1.4 mi	North Manchester, IN	★★★★☆	3/5
Wellbrooke of Wabash	13.1 mi	Wabash, IN	★★★★☆	3/5
Waters of Wabash Skilled Nursing Facility East the	13.1 mi	Wabash, IN	★☆☆☆☆	1/5
Waters of Wabash Skilled Nursing Facility West	13.2 mi	Wabash, IN	★★★★☆	4/5
Autumn Ridge Rehabilitation Centre	14.0 mi	Wabash, IN	★★★★☆	4/5
Grace Village Health Care Facility	15.1 mi	Winona Lake, IN	★★★★★	5/5
Miller's Merry Manor	15.3 mi	Warsaw, IN	★★★★☆	4/5
Heritage Pointe of Huntington	15.4 mi	Huntington, IN	★★☆☆☆	2/5	abuse
Vernon Health & Rehabilitation	15.9 mi	Wabash, IN	★★★☆☆	3/5
Warsaw Meadows	16.3 mi	Warsaw, IN	★☆☆☆☆	1/5	abuse

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in North Manchester →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 155655.

The Care File

Visit checklist — Peabody Retirement Community

400 W Seventh St, North Manchester, IN 46962 · 2609828616

Health inspection rating 2/5 · CMS overall 3/5· Fines (3y): $22,071

Most serious findings on record:

▲ Jun 7, 2024 (F-0689, Immediate jeopardy, one-off): The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
▲ Apr 18, 2024 (F-0744, Actual harm, one-off): The facility did not provide the right treatment and services for residents with dementia or signs of dementia. Dementia care requires specific approaches, training, and patience.

Questions for the administrator:

☐ "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
☐ "What specific dementia training do your staff receive, and how do you handle difficult moments without medication?"
☐ "How do you make sure each resident's care follows the doctor's orders, and what changed after this citation?"
☐ "How do you identify and arrange specialized services for residents with mental health conditions or disabilities?"
☐ "What percentage of your residents are on antipsychotic or sedating medications, and how do you work to reduce that?"
☐ "Can you tell me what this citation involved and what steps you took to bring care back up to standard?"
☐ "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
☐ "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
☐ "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
☐ "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"

While you're there, notice:

☐ Smell and cleanliness in hallways, not just the lobby
☐ How staff speak to residents; call lights answered promptly
☐ Residents up, dressed, and engaged (visit mealtimes and a weekend if you can)

Data: CMS Provider Data Catalog, version 2026-08-01 · CCN 155655 · Verify at medicare.gov/care-compare · Printed from The Care File (thecarefile.com)