How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
954 E Prudhomme St, Opelousas, LA 70570 (opens Google Maps) · St. Landry County · (337) 948-3634· 120 certified beds · avg 110 residents/day · certified since May 1, 1996 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: RIGHTCARE HEALTH SERVICES (13 facilities, chain avg rating 2.9★)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Showing the latest 3 of 24 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day. F-0732
The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. F-0550
The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. F-0609
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 25, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day. · F-0732 |
| Feb 25, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · F-0550 |
| Feb 25, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · F-0609 |
| Feb 25, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need. · F-0644 |
| Feb 25, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Feb 25, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · F-0842 |
| Feb 25, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Jan 8, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Jan 8, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Jan 8, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · F-0550 |
| Jan 8, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate. · F-0554 |
| Jan 8, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| Jan 8, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677 |
| Jan 8, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Nov 13, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the right treatment and services for residents with dementia or signs of dementia. Dementia care requires specific approaches, training, and patience. · from a complaint · F-0744 |
| Dec 6, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Dec 6, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not enter each resident's assessment information into the required format and send it to the state within 7 days of completing the assessment, as the rules require. · F-0640 |
| Dec 6, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| Dec 6, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657 |
| Dec 6, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Dec 6, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not arrange hospice services for a resident who needed them, or help the resident move to a facility that could arrange hospice. Hospice provides comfort-focused care for people nearing the end of life. · F-0849 |
| Dec 6, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Oct 31, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · from a complaint · F-0580 |
| Oct 31, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility admitted a resident without a doctor's order, or did not make sure each resident stayed under a doctor's ongoing care. · from a complaint · F-0710 |
Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (7 → 7).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 9 | 0 | E |
| 2024 | 1 | 0 | D |
| 2025 | 7 | 0 | E |
| 2026 | 7 | 0 | E |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Louisiana avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.75 | 4.04 | 3.95 | bottom 36% in Louisiana; bottom 49% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.24 | 0.32 | 0.69 | bottom 41% in Louisiana; bottom 5% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.40 | 3.45 | 3.50 | bottom 48% in Louisiana; top 48% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.09 | 0.20 | 0.48 | bottom 12% in Louisiana; bottom 1% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 26.6 | 47.6 | 45.8 | top 6% in Louisiana; top 9% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 28.6 | 41.6 | 42.9 | top 31% in Louisiana; top 26% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.72, RN 0.24, weekend 3.37.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.72 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 3/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 3/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Our Lady of Prompt Succor Nursing Facility. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Abington Family Holdings LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 6% | 04/01/2023 |
| B & J Limited Partnership | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 6% | 11/01/2022 |
| Broussard, Scott | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 10% | 11/01/2022 |
| Davis, John | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 10% | 11/01/2022 |
| Davis, Michael | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 10% | 11/01/2022 |
| Davis, Thomas | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 11/01/2022 |
| Healthcare Advisory LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 5% | 11/01/2022 |
| Jones, Calvin | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 6% | 11/01/2022 |
| Jsss-Snf LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 10% | 11/01/2022 |
| Opelousashpops, LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 6% | 11/01/2022 |
| SHM Opelousas Pfu LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 40% | 11/01/2022 |
| SRB Investments, LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 10% | 11/01/2022 |
| Stevens, Vikki | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 6% | 11/01/2022 |
| The Vernice C Wright Irrevocable Trust | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 6% | 11/01/2022 |
| Perry, Brandie | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2022 |
| Perry, Brandie | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/27/2025 |
| Rightcare Health Services LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2024 |
| Rightcare Health Services LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/27/2025 |
| Sanders, Jack | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2022 |
| Sanders, Jack | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2022 |
Showing 20 of 21 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 1 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
CMS lists this facility under the chain Rightcare Health Services — 13 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 12 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heritage Manor of Opelousas | 0.8 mi | Opelousas, LA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Senior Village Nursing & Rehabilitation Center | 4.5 mi | Opelousas, LA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Acadia St. Landry Nursing & Rehabilitation Center | 12.8 mi | Church Point, LA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| J. Michael Morrow Memorial Nursing Home | 13.1 mi | Arnaudville, LA | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Tri-Community Nursing Center | 13.3 mi | Palmetto, LA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Evangeline Oaks Guest House | 16.5 mi | Carencro, LA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Heritage Manor of Ville Platte | 16.9 mi | Ville Platte, LA | ★★★☆☆ | 4/5 | |
| Eunice Manor | 17.6 mi | Eunice, LA | ★★★☆☆ | 4/5 | |
| Courtyard Manor Nurse Care Center & Assisted Liv | 18.5 mi | Lafayette, LA | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in St. Landry, LA — 7 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 195369.
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details