How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
2470 South Arizona Avenue, Yuma, AZ 85364 (opens Google Maps) · Yuma County · (928) 344-8541· 120 certified beds · avg 103 residents/day · certified since Oct 20, 1989 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: HAVEN HEALTH (20 facilities, chain avg rating 2.7★)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
▲ Immediate jeopardy, pattern · Jun 23, 2023 · F-0689
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (K): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was a pattern: more than a limited occurrence, without being widespread. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Aug 4, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
Showing the latest 3 of 13 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it. F-0697
The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. F-0761
The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. F-0812
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 23, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it. · F-0697 |
| Jul 23, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Jul 23, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Jun 23, 2023 | ▲ K · Immediate jeopardy, pattern | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Jun 23, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have a registered nurse on duty at least 8 hours a day, or did not have a registered nurse serving full-time as director of nursing. · F-0727 |
| Jun 23, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services. · F-0645 |
| Jun 23, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Apr 21, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services. · F-0645 |
| Apr 21, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not properly plan a resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs after leaving. · F-0660 |
| Apr 21, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility's activities program was not run by a qualified professional. The person directing recreation and social activities must have proper training or credentials. · F-0680 |
| Apr 21, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| Apr 21, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · F-0686 |
| Apr 21, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (4 → 3).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 6 | 0 | D |
| 2023 | 4 | 1 | K ▲ |
| 2025 | 3 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Arizona avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.32 | 3.97 | 3.95 | bottom 24% in Arizona; bottom 27% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.58 | 0.69 | 0.69 | bottom 47% in Arizona; bottom 50% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 2.83 | 3.50 | 3.50 | bottom 20% in Arizona; bottom 22% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.46 | 0.49 | 0.48 | top 41% in Arizona; top 38% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 39.6 | 45.2 | 45.8 | top 27% in Arizona; top 35% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 37.5 | 43.6 | 42.9 | top 32% in Arizona; top 42% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.47, RN 0.61, weekend 2.96.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.47 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 3/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Haven of Yuma. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Robertson, Brett | Individual | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2014 |
| Samuelian, Robert | Individual | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2014 |
| Samuelian, Spencer | Individual | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2014 |
| Samuelian, Stephen | Individual | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2014 |
| Seastrand, Jason | Individual | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2014 |
| West, Christian | Individual | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2014 |
| El Amin, Mohemed | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/15/2025 |
| El Amin, Mohemed | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/15/2025 |
| Espinosa, Stephanie | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/14/2024 |
| Espinosa, Stephanie | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/08/2025 |
| Espinosa, Stephanie | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/08/2025 |
| Fonseca, Brandon | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/08/2025 |
| Fonseca, Brandon | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/08/2025 |
| Fragoso, Lindsay | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/10/2021 |
| Fragoso, Lindsay | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/08/2025 |
| Fragoso, Lindsay | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/08/2025 |
| Globe-Yuma Real Estate Partners | Organization | 5% or Greater Mortgage Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2014 |
| Globe-Yuma Real Estate Partners | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/26/2024 |
| Haven Health Group Globe Yuma LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Mortgage Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2014 |
| Haven Health Group Globe Yuma LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/26/2024 |
Showing 20 of 40 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 20 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
CMS lists this facility under the chain Haven Health — 20 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 19 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Haven of Sandpointe, LLC | 0.7 mi | Yuma, AZ | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Life Care Center of Yuma | 1.2 mi | Yuma, AZ | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Yuma Nursing Center | 1.2 mi | Yuma, AZ | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Welbrook Yuma Opco LLC | 1.2 mi | Yuma, AZ | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Arizona State Veteran Home - Yuma | 5.9 mi | Yuma, AZ | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 035197.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details