ArizonaKingman

The Lingenfelter Center

1099 Sunrise Avenue, Kingman, AZ 86401 · Mohave County · 88 certified beds · avg 73 residents/day · certified since Jul 10, 2003

Abuse citation flag (CMS)

The abuse flag means inspectors cited this facility for abuse that caused harm to a resident within the past year, or potential for harm in each of the last two years. Source: CMS.

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
4.41
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5

⚠ The most recent standard health inspection was more than 2 years ago — conditions may have changed.

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (20)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Apr 8, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
May 15, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Nov 14, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Nov 14, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Jun 6, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day.
Jun 6, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Jun 6, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility transferred or discharged a resident without a valid reason, or failed to provide the required documentation and information when moving a resident out.
Jun 6, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Jun 6, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Jun 6, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility's activities program was not run by a qualified professional. The person directing recreation and social activities must have proper training or credentials.
Jun 6, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Jun 6, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide necessary behavioral health care and services — support for residents' mental and emotional wellbeing, including conditions like depression and anxiety.
Jun 6, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Jun 6, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Jun 6, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
Jun 6, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep all essential equipment working safely — things like heating and cooling systems, kitchen equipment, and medical devices.
May 15, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Mar 27, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Feb 23, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Dec 16, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (1 → 12).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202110D
202310D
2024160E
202510D
202610D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityArizona avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)4.413.973.95top 24% in Arizona; top 26% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.690.690.69top 35% in Arizona; top 37% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing4.043.503.50top 21% in Arizona; top 22% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.340.490.48bottom 32% in Arizona; bottom 40% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)46.445.245.8bottom 48% in Arizona; bottom 46% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)30.843.642.9top 22% in Arizona; top 30% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.72, RN 0.58, weekend 3.40. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 2/5 · long-stay residents: 2/5 · short-stay residents: —/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Collins, JessicaIndividualDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE02/28/2017
Collins, JillianIndividualDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE02/28/2017
Collins, JoshuaIndividualDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE02/28/2017
Creative Care INCOrganizationDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE05/03/2013
Lingenfelter, FredIndividualDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2014
Overson, SaraIndividualDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2014
Terry, SandraIndividualDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2014
Cobanovich, StephanieIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE06/16/2020
Cobanovich, StephanieIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/16/2020
Collins, JessicaIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE02/28/2017
Collins, JessicaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE02/20/2017
Collins, JessicaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE02/28/2017
Collins, JillianIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE02/28/2017
Collins, JoshuaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE02/28/2017
Creative Care INCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/15/2005
Creative Care INCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE02/14/2025
Ernest L Harman MD Zia Way LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2008
Ernest L Harman MD Zia Way LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE02/28/2025
Harman, ErnestIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2008
Harman, ErnestIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2008

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
The Gardens Rehab & Care Center0.0 miKingman, AZ★★★☆☆3/5
Desert Highlands Care Center0.1 miKingman, AZ★★★☆☆3/5

Compare this facility with the 2 closest →

All facilities in Kingman →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 035262.