TexasHarlingen

Harlingen Nursing and Rehabilitation Center

3810 Hale Ave, Harlingen, TX 78550 · Cameron County · 120 certified beds · avg 102 residents/day · certified since Jun 26, 1996

Part of chain: WELLSENTIAL HEALTH (67 facilities, chain avg rating 2.7★)

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
2
Serious findings on record
$6,016
Fines, last 3 years
3.17
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Feb 20, 2026 · F-0684 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.

Why it matters: Care that strays from doctor's orders or ignores the resident's wishes can lead to declining health and avoidable harm.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Feb 21, 2026 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Sep 20, 2024 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Oct 9, 2023 (Past Non-Compliance)

All citations in the current public record (19)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Feb 24, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Feb 24, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Feb 24, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Feb 24, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Feb 24, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle.
Feb 24, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Feb 24, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not serve meals and snacks at times that fit residents' needs, preferences, and requests, or did not offer nourishing alternatives for residents who want to eat outside scheduled meal times.
Feb 24, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.
Feb 24, 2026C · Minimal risk, facility-wideThe facility did not make its inspection results easy for residents to see, or made it hard for residents to contact advocacy agencies like the ombudsman.
Feb 20, 2026▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Nov 8, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Nov 8, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Nov 8, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Sep 20, 2024▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Nov 15, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint
Nov 15, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint
Aug 3, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Aug 3, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle.
Aug 3, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (3 → 9).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202350D
202441J ▲
2026101J ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $6,016.

DateTypeAmount / length
Sep 20, 2024Fine$6,016

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityTexas avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.173.463.95bottom 36% in Texas; bottom 20% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.260.440.69bottom 19% in Texas; bottom 6% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing2.823.043.50bottom 41% in Texas; bottom 22% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.140.340.48bottom 7% in Texas; bottom 4% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)32.955.345.8top 9% in Texas; top 20% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)28.654.642.9top 15% in Texas; top 26% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.48, RN 0.29, weekend 3.10. Staffing rating: 2/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Who owns this facility

Government - Hospital district

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
CSV Rhea Management Holdco, LLCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2023
DWD TX Holdings LLCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2023
Jack and Nancy Dwyer Workforce Development Center INCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2023
Oakbend Medical CenterOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%03/01/2023
Reg HG Opco 1, LLCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2023
Reg HG Opco LLCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2023
Reg Operator Holdco LLCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2023
Regency Ihs of Harlingen LLCOrganizationDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2023
Regency Integrated Health Services LLCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2023
Regency Texas Holdings LLCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2023
3810 Hale Street LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2023
Baird, DanielIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE04/13/2021
Bedolla, MichaelIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2025
Castillo, RubyIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2025
Clapp, BarbaraIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2021
Cortese, DarenIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE08/10/2021
Crayton, TomIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE01/15/2013
Dekowski, DonovanIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2023
Dekowski, DonovanIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2023
Dorman, JohnIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE01/18/2022

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Windsor Nursing and Rehabilitation Center of Harli0.4 miHarlingen, TX★★★★★4/5
Treasure Hills Healthcare and Rehabilitation Cente0.7 miHarlingen, TX★★★☆☆3/5
Sun Valley Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center1.0 miHarlingen, TX★★★★★5/5
Golden Palms Rehabilitation and Retirement1.0 miHarlingen, TX★★★★☆4/5
Windsor Atrium1.9 miHarlingen, TX★★☆☆☆2/5
Veranda Rehabilitation and Healthcare10.8 miHarlingen, TX★★★★★4/5
Mid Valley Nursing & Rehabilitation12.3 miMercedes, TX★★☆☆☆2/5
Brownsville Nursing and Rehabilitation Center17.0 miBrownsville, TX★☆☆☆☆2/5
Windsor Nursing and Rehabilitation Center of Wesla18.3 miWeslaco, TX★★☆☆☆3/5
Valley Grande Manor18.8 miWeslaco, TX★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
Mesa Hills Post Acute19.1 miBrownsville, TX★★★☆☆3/5
Weslaco Nursing and Rehabilitation Center19.1 miWeslaco, TX★★★★☆4/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Harlingen →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 675606.