TexasBeaumont

Jefferson Nursing and Rehabilitation Center

3840 Pointe Parkway, Beaumont, TX 77706 · Jefferson County · 120 certified beds · avg 94 residents/day · certified since Mar 18, 2009

Part of chain: WELLSENTIAL HEALTH (67 facilities, chain avg rating 2.7★)

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
3
Serious findings on record
$194,652
Fines, last 3 years
3.34
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 1/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, repeated · May 17, 2025 · F-0600 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.

Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.

Severity (K): A life-threatening or extremely dangerous situation affected several residents. Among the most serious findings an inspection can produce.

Corrected: Jun 12, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, repeated · May 17, 2025 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (K): A life-threatening or extremely dangerous situation affected several residents. Among the most serious findings an inspection can produce.

Corrected: Jun 12, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · May 17, 2025 · F-0607 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection.

Why it matters: Without working prevention policies, mistreatment is more likely to happen and less likely to be caught.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Mar 17, 2025 (Past Non-Compliance)

All citations in the current public record (21)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Jul 1, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint
Jul 31, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Jul 31, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Jul 31, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jul 31, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Jul 31, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
May 17, 2025▲ K · Immediate jeopardy, repeatedThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
May 17, 2025▲ K · Immediate jeopardy, repeatedThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
May 17, 2025▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection. · from a complaint
May 17, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
May 30, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
May 30, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
May 30, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have policies on smoking.
May 30, 2024B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility did not enter each resident's assessment information into the required format and send it to the state within 7 days of completing the assessment, as the rules require.
Jan 22, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · from a complaint
Dec 29, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · from a complaint
Dec 29, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint
Apr 12, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services.
Apr 12, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Apr 12, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Apr 12, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide or arrange dental services for its residents. Nursing homes are responsible for making sure residents can get dental care.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (4 → 5).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202360D
202450E
202593K ▲
202610D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $194,652.

DateTypeAmount / length
May 17, 2025Fine$194,652

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityTexas avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.343.463.95top 48% in Texas; bottom 28% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.220.440.69bottom 11% in Texas; bottom 3% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.093.043.50top 35% in Texas; bottom 36% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.190.340.48bottom 19% in Texas; bottom 10% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)52.255.345.8bottom 50% in Texas; bottom 31% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)0.054.642.9

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.30, RN 0.21, weekend 3.05. Staffing rating: 1/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 2/5

Who owns this facility

Non profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
CSV Rhea Management Holdco, LLCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2015
DWD TX Holdings LLCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2015
Jack and Nancy Dwyer Workforce Development Center INCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2015
Liberty County Hospital District No 1Organization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%11/30/2014
Reg HG Opco 1, LLCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2015
Reg HG Opco LLCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2015
Reg Operator Holdco LLCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2015
Regency Ihs of Jefferson LLCOrganizationDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2015
Regency Texas Holdings LLCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2015
3840 Point Parkway LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2015
Anwar, SyedIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2025
Baird, DanielIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE04/13/2021
Carvajal, AntonioIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE05/16/2024
Clapp, BarbaraIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2021
Cortese, DarenIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE08/10/2021
Dekowski, DonovanIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2015
Dekowski, DonovanIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2015
Doxey, CynthiaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2026
Doxey, CynthiaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2026
Fontenot, AmyIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE12/18/2023

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Calder Woods3.1 miBeaumont, TX★★★☆☆3/5
Harmony Care at Beaumont3.4 miBeaumont, TX—/5abuseSFF
Beaumont Health Care Center3.8 miBeaumont, TX★★★★☆4/5
Spindletop Hill Nursing and Rehabilitation Center4.2 miBeaumont, TX★☆☆☆☆2/5
College Street Health Care Center4.3 miBeaumont, TX★★★★☆4/5
Beaumont Nursing and Rehabilitation4.3 miBeaumont, TX★★☆☆☆2/5
Avir at Beaumont4.3 miBeaumont, TX★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
Focused Care at Summer Place4.6 miBeaumont, TX★☆☆☆☆2/5
Village Creek Rehabilitation and Nursing Center10.0 miLumberton, TX★☆☆☆☆1/5
Oakwood Manor Nursing Home10.2 miVidor, TX★★★★☆4/5
Vidor Health & Rehabilitation Center10.2 miVidor, TX★☆☆☆☆1/5
Silsbee Oaks Health Care LLP15.6 miSilsbee, TX★★★☆☆4/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Beaumont →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 676218.