TexasHarlingen

Treasure Hills Healthcare and Rehabilitation Cente

2204 Pease St, Harlingen, TX 78550 · Cameron County · 120 certified beds · avg 92 residents/day · certified since Sep 3, 2002

Part of chain: THE ENSIGN GROUP (342 facilities, chain avg rating 3.2★)

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.27
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (26)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Jun 10, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint
Jun 10, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · from a complaint
Dec 10, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Dec 10, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Dec 10, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Dec 10, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Dec 10, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.
Dec 10, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Aug 21, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Aug 21, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need. · from a complaint
Aug 21, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · from a complaint
Jun 18, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Jun 18, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Sep 20, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician.
Sep 20, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Sep 20, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Sep 20, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.
Sep 20, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Sep 20, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature.
Aug 15, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. · from a complaint
Aug 15, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have a working call system — the button or cord residents use to summon help — in each resident's bathroom and bathing area. · from a complaint
Feb 5, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection. · from a complaint
Feb 5, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Feb 5, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Jun 16, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have a registered nurse on duty at least 8 hours a day, or did not have a registered nurse serving full-time as director of nursing.
Jun 16, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (6 → 6).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202320D
2024110E
2025110E
202620D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityTexas avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.273.463.95bottom 46% in Texas; bottom 25% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.300.440.69bottom 30% in Texas; bottom 10% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing2.743.043.50bottom 34% in Texas; bottom 18% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.120.340.48bottom 5% in Texas; bottom 3% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)37.755.345.8top 16% in Texas; top 30% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)37.554.642.9top 26% in Texas; top 42% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.59, RN 0.33, weekend 3.00. Staffing rating: 2/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Fannin County Hospital AuthorityOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest12/01/2023
Black Ridge Canyon Healthcare LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2023
Black Ridge Canyon Healthcare LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/27/2025
Burnam, SoonIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2023
Ensign Services INCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2023
Gutierrez, AmyIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2023
Gutierrez, AmyIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2023
Gutierrez, AmyIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/27/2025
Littleton Health Holdings LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/02/2023
Rodriguez, JoseIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2024
Rodriguez, JoseIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/27/2025
Sanderson, ClarkIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2023
Standard Bearer Healthcare Op, LPOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/02/2023
The Ensign Group INCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/02/2023

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Golden Palms Rehabilitation and Retirement0.3 miHarlingen, TX★★★★☆4/5
Sun Valley Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center0.7 miHarlingen, TX★★★★★5/5
Harlingen Nursing and Rehabilitation Center0.7 miHarlingen, TX★★★☆☆2/5
Windsor Nursing and Rehabilitation Center of Harli0.8 miHarlingen, TX★★★★★4/5
Windsor Atrium1.7 miHarlingen, TX★★☆☆☆2/5
Veranda Rehabilitation and Healthcare11.4 miHarlingen, TX★★★★★4/5
Mid Valley Nursing & Rehabilitation12.8 miMercedes, TX★★☆☆☆2/5
Brownsville Nursing and Rehabilitation Center17.0 miBrownsville, TX★☆☆☆☆2/5
Windsor Nursing and Rehabilitation Center of Wesla18.8 miWeslaco, TX★★☆☆☆3/5
Mesa Hills Post Acute19.1 miBrownsville, TX★★★☆☆3/5
Fox Hollow Post Acute19.1 miBrownsville, TX★☆☆☆☆1/5
Valley Grande Manor19.4 miWeslaco, TX★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Harlingen →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 675933.