Gulfport Nursing Center
1430 Pasadena Ave S, Pasadena, FL 33707 · Pinellas County · 126 certified beds · avg 44 residents/day · certified since Nov 24, 2013
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
Health inspection rating: ★☆☆☆☆1/5 · CMS overall rating: 1/5
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.
Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)
▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Jun 13, 2025 · F-0600 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.
Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.
Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.
Corrected: Aug 1, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Jun 13, 2025 · F-0726 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident.
Why it matters: Undertrained caregivers are more likely to miss warning signs and make care mistakes.
Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.
Corrected: Aug 1, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Aug 11, 2023 · F-0726 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident.
Why it matters: Undertrained caregivers are more likely to miss warning signs and make care mistakes.
Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.
Corrected: Sep 13, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
All citations in the current public record (26)
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2026 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident. · from a complaint |
| Dec 15, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · from a complaint |
| Jun 13, 2025 | ▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-off | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint |
| Jun 13, 2025 | ▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-off | The facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident. · from a complaint |
| Jun 13, 2025 | F · Potential for harm, facility-wide | The facility did not provide required paperwork or notices about a resident's needs, their right to appeal a transfer or discharge, or the facility's bed-hold policy (how long a bed is saved during a hospital stay). |
| Jun 13, 2025 | F · Potential for harm, facility-wide | The facility did not have a registered nurse on duty at least 8 hours a day, or did not have a registered nurse serving full-time as director of nursing. |
| Jun 13, 2025 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. |
| Jun 13, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services. |
| Jun 13, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. |
| Jun 13, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline. |
| Jun 13, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not safely and appropriately administer IV fluids (fluids given through a vein) for residents who needed them. |
| Jun 13, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide appropriate treatment and services to residents with a mental health condition, difficulty adjusting emotionally, or a history of trauma or post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). |
| Aug 11, 2023 | ▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-off | The facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident. · from a complaint |
| Mar 30, 2023 | F · Potential for harm, facility-wide | The facility did not run an ongoing quality assurance committee that reviews care problems and creates plans to fix them. |
| Mar 30, 2023 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. |
| Mar 30, 2023 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. |
| Mar 30, 2023 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not keep all essential equipment working safely — things like heating and cooling systems, kitchen equipment, and medical devices. |
| Mar 30, 2023 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors. |
| Mar 30, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need. |
| Mar 30, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. |
| Mar 30, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. |
| Mar 30, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. |
| Jul 1, 2021 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day. |
| Jul 1, 2021 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. |
| Jul 1, 2021 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. |
| Jul 1, 2021 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (9 → 8).
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 4 | 0 | E |
| 2023 | 10 | 1 | J ▲ |
| 2025 | 11 | 2 | J ▲ |
| 2026 | 1 | 0 | E |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
2 fines totaling $6,705.
| Date | Type | Amount / length |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 28, 2023 | Fine | $3,529 |
| Aug 21, 2023 | Fine | $3,176 |
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
| Measure | This facility | Florida avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.91 | 4.03 | 3.95 | top 47% in Florida; top 44% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.64 | 0.76 | 0.69 | bottom 46% in Florida; top 44% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.52 | 3.68 | 3.50 | bottom 49% in Florida; top 41% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.39 | 0.53 | 0.48 | bottom 39% in Florida; top 49% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 47.5 | 41.4 | 45.8 | bottom 35% in Florida; bottom 43% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 55.6 | 46.0 | 42.9 | bottom 31% in Florida; bottom 28% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.59, RN 0.58, weekend 3.23. Staffing rating: 3/5.
Self-reported quality measures
Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.
Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 2/5
Who owns this facility
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Flnho Capital Group LLC | Organization | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/08/2022 |
| Gulfport Nursing Member, LLC | Organization | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/08/2022 |
| Landa, Benjamin | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/08/2022 |
| Tampa 3 Opco Partners LLC | Organization | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/08/2022 |
| Gulfport Nursing Member, LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/08/2022 |
| Hibnick, Philip | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/25/2025 |
| Hibnick, Philip | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/25/2025 |
| Korbaj, Rabee | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2026 |
| Landa, Benjamin | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2024 |
| Landa, Benjamin | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/08/2022 |
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "Tell me about this abuse or neglect citation — what happened, and what specific changes did you make afterward?"
- "How do you verify that your nurses and aides have the skills to care for residents with needs like my family member's?"
- "Who is on the team that builds each resident's care plan, and how quickly is it in place after admission?"
- "What written notices do we get before any transfer or discharge, and what is your bed-hold policy?"
- "How many hours a day is a registered nurse physically in the building, including weekends?"
- "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
- "How do you screen new residents for mental health and disability-related needs, and how do you provide the specialized services they require?"
- "How many aides are on each shift, and how do you make sure every resident gets timely help with bathing, dressing, and meals?"
- "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
- "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"
Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aviata at the Sea - Pasadena | 0.2 mi | South Pasadena, FL | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Springs at Boca Ciega Bay | 1.1 mi | South Pasadena, FL | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Egret Cove Center | 1.4 mi | Saint Petersburg, FL | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Boca Ciega Center | 1.5 mi | Gulfport, FL | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Marion and Bernard L Samson Nursing Center | 2.0 mi | Saint Petersburg, FL | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Eagle Lake Nursing and Rehab Care Center | 2.1 mi | Saint Petersburg, FL | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Alpine Health and Rehabilitation Center | 3.5 mi | Saint Petersburg, FL | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Alhambra Healthcare & Rehabilitation Center | 3.6 mi | Saint Petersburg, FL | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Addington Place at College Harbor | 3.8 mi | Saint Petersburg, FL | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Golfview Nursing Center | 3.9 mi | Saint Petersburg, FL | ★★☆☆☆ | 3/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 106103.