Grove of Fox Valley,the

1601 North Farnsworth Avenue, Aurora, IL 60505 (opens Google Maps) · Kane County · (630) 898-1180· 158 certified beds · avg 124 residents/day · certified since Jun 1, 1973 · Medicare and Medicaid certified

Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →

Part of chain: LEGACY HEALTHCARE (89 facilities, chain avg rating 2.9★)

4/5

Health inspection rating (on-site)

inspected Mar 27, 2026

Serious findings on record

most recent Apr 18, 2026

Fines, last 3 years

2.44

Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

New to these records? How to read an inspection report →

Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5 · how star ratings work →

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, isolated · Apr 18, 2026 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.

Corrected: May 1, 2026 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, isolated · Sep 14, 2023 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Corrected: Sep 27, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

Inspection findings in the public record

Showing the latest 3 of 26 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.

Apr 18, 2026G · Actual harm, isolated
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint F-0689
Apr 18, 2026D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated
The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint F-0610
Apr 18, 2026D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated
The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · from a complaint F-0690

View all 26 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.

Date	Severity	What the facility was cited for
Apr 18, 2026	▲ G · Actual harm, isolated	The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689
Apr 18, 2026	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint · F-0610
Apr 18, 2026	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · from a complaint · F-0690
Mar 27, 2026	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880
Mar 27, 2026	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684
Mar 27, 2026	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not safely and appropriately administer IV fluids (fluids given through a vein) for residents who needed them. · F-0694
Mar 27, 2026	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. · F-0760
Apr 28, 2025	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint · F-0677
Jan 9, 2025	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · F-0755
Jan 9, 2025	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not help a resident get vision and hearing services — such as eye exams, glasses, hearing tests, or hearing aids. · F-0685
Jan 9, 2025	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · F-0686
Jan 9, 2025	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline. · F-0688
Jan 9, 2025	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not provide food that accounts for each resident's allergies, intolerances, and personal preferences, or did not offer appealing alternatives. · F-0806
Jan 9, 2025	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not have a working program to monitor how antibiotics are used. Tracking antibiotic use helps make sure these drugs are given only when needed and remain effective. · F-0881
Mar 15, 2024	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate. · F-0554
Mar 15, 2024	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689
Mar 15, 2024	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not have a policy covering how food brought in by family and visitors is used and stored safely. · F-0813
Mar 15, 2024	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care. · F-0578
Mar 15, 2024	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility used physical restraints — devices that limit a resident's movement — when they weren't needed for medical treatment. · F-0604
Mar 15, 2024	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not properly plan a resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs after leaving. · F-0660
Mar 15, 2024	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility allowed residents to lose the ability to do daily activities — like bathing, dressing, and eating — when there was no medical reason for the decline. Good care helps residents keep the abilities they have. · F-0676
Mar 15, 2024	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684
Mar 15, 2024	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not safely and appropriately administer IV fluids (fluids given through a vein) for residents who needed them. · F-0694
Mar 15, 2024	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695
Sep 14, 2023	▲ G · Actual harm, isolated	The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689
Aug 16, 2023	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (6 → 4).

Citations by recorded inspection yearPublished citation counts, not a quality score · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01

All citationsSerious citations (G–L)

2023

2024

2025

2026

All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.

Year	Citations	Serious (G–L)	Worst severity that year
2023	2	1	G ▲
2024	10	0	E
2025	7	0	E
2026	7	1	G ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

How to file a complaint about care →

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

What these staffing numbers mean →

Nurse time, in contextAdjusted hours per resident per day · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01

This facilityIllinois averageU.S. average

Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)

2.44

2.99

3.95

Registered Nurse hours

0.68

0.63

0.69

Weekend total nurse staffing

2.35

2.67

3.50

All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.

Measure	This facility	Illinois avg	U.S. avg	Where it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)	2.44	2.99	3.95	bottom 33% in Illinois; bottom 3% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours	0.68	0.63	0.69	top 29% in Illinois; top 39% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing	2.35	2.67	3.50	bottom 47% in Illinois; bottom 6% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)	0.84	0.56	0.48	top 16% in Illinois; top 10% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)	40.5	44.5	45.8	top 40% in Illinois; top 38% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)	25.0	41.8	42.9	top 23% in Illinois; top 20% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.38, RN 0.94, weekend 3.26.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.38 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 3/5.

Quality measures: assessments & claims

Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.

Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 2/5

Costs & payment

Price evidence · separate from quality

No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Grove of Fox Valley,the. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.

Calculate a stay from a quote you receive

Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.

Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.

Before you compare prices

Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.

Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price

Who owns this facility

How to read ownership records →

Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →

For profit - Individual

Owner / manager	Type	Role	Stake	Since
Doros Generation Trust U/A/D 1/3/12	Organization	5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest	50%	01/01/2017
GPN Family Trust U/A/D 4/28/08	Organization	5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest	50%	01/01/2017
Doros Generation Trust U/A/D 1/3/12	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	02/01/2014
GPN Family Trust U/A/D 4/28/08	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	02/01/2014
Kalra, Sandeep	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	02/01/2014
Kalra, Sandeep	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	02/01/2014
Lake Forest Bank & Trust Company, N.a.	Organization	5% or Greater Security Interest	NOT APPLICABLE	12/01/2024
Lake Forest Bank & Trust Company, N.a.	Organization	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	12/01/2024
Lanning, Camberly	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	07/01/2015
Lanning, Camberly	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	07/01/2015
Legacy Healthcare Financial Services LLC	Organization	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	02/01/2014
Legacy Healthcare Financial Services LLC	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	11/17/2025
Prairie Property Holdings, CC	Organization	5% or Greater Security Interest	NOT APPLICABLE	02/01/2014
Prairie Property Holdings, CC	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	11/17/2025
RSM Us LLP	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	01/01/2024
Shabat, Menachem	Individual	Managing Control - Governing Body	NOT APPLICABLE	01/01/2017
Shabat, Menachem	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	01/01/2017
Shabat, Menachem	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	01/01/2017

All 18 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.

Other facilities in the same chain

CMS lists this facility under the chain Legacy Healthcare — 89 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.

Grove of Lagrange Park, the — La Grange Park, IL · overall 3/5
Grove of Northbrook,the — Northbrook, IL · overall 4/5
Grove of Skokie, the — Skokie, IL · overall 4/5
Harmony Healthcare & Rehab Ctr — Chicago, IL · overall 5/5
Harmony Palos — Palos Heights, IL · overall 2/5
Lakefront Nursing & Rehab Ctr — Chicago, IL · overall 4/5
Nexus at Berwyn — Berwyn, IL · overall 1/5
Peterson Park Health Care Ctr — Chicago, IL · overall 2/5abuse

Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 88 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.

Questions to ask on your visit

Full visit checklist →

Print visit checklist

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

"What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
"If someone reports suspected abuse or neglect here, what happens in the first 24 hours?"
"How do you care for residents with incontinence or catheters, and what do you do to prevent urinary tract infections?"
"Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
"How do you make sure each resident's care follows the doctor's orders, and what changed after this citation?"
"Who on your staff manages IV therapy, and what training and monitoring is in place?"
"What systems do you use to prevent medication errors, and what happens when one occurs?"
"How many aides are on each shift, and how do you make sure every resident gets timely help with bathing, dressing, and meals?"

Also worth asking anywhere

"Your weekend nurse staffing is reported below the Illinois midpoint — how does the weekend schedule differ from a weekday?"
"Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
"CMS reports 41% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
"The ownership record on file lists 18 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
"Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"

Nearby facilities (12 closest of 81 within 20 miles)

Facility	Distance	City	Overall	Inspection	Flags
Avantara Aurora	2.2 mi	Aurora, IL	★★★★☆	4/5
Asbury Gardens Nsg & Rehab	2.3 mi	North Aurora, IL	★★★★☆	4/5
North Aurora Living & Rehab Ctr	2.4 mi	North Aurora, IL	★★★☆☆	2/5
Jennings Terrace	3.2 mi	Aurora, IL	★★★★☆	4/5
La Bella of Aurora	3.5 mi	Aurora, IL	★☆☆☆☆	1/5	abuse
Alden Courts of Waterford	3.6 mi	Aurora, IL	★★★★☆	4/5
Alden of Waterford	3.6 mi	Aurora, IL	★★★☆☆	3/5
Thrive of Fox Valley	3.7 mi	Aurora, IL	★★★★☆	4/5
Springs at Monarch Landing, the	4.3 mi	Naperville, IL	★★★★★	4/5
Tabor Hills Health Care Fac	4.6 mi	Naperville, IL	★★★★★	4/5
St Patrick's Residence	5.0 mi	Naperville, IL	★★★☆☆	2/5	abuse
Pearl of Orchard Valley	5.0 mi	Aurora, IL	★☆☆☆☆	1/5	abuse

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

Other facilities in the same county

CMS records place this facility in Kane, IL — 25 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.

Highland Oaks — Elgin, IL · overall 5/5
Michaelsen Health Center — Batavia, IL · overall 5/5
Pearl of Elgin, the — Elgin, IL · overall 4/5
Pearl of St Charles, the — St Charles, IL · overall 1/5

Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.

All facilities in Aurora →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 145006.