Asbury Gardens Nsg & Rehab
212 Airport Road, North Aurora, IL 60542 · Kane County · 75 certified beds · avg 60 residents/day · certified since Sep 5, 2014
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.
Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)
▲ Actual harm, one-off · Dec 11, 2025 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.
Corrected: Dec 19, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
All citations in the current public record (20)
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 16, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. |
| Jan 16, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. |
| Jan 16, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. |
| Jan 10, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not honor residents' right to receive the visitors they choose, at the times they choose. · from a complaint |
| Dec 11, 2025 | ▲ G · Actual harm, one-off | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint |
| Nov 14, 2024 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. |
| Nov 14, 2024 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not prepare and serve food in a form that meets each resident's individual needs — for example, chopped, pureed, or softened food for residents with chewing or swallowing problems. |
| Nov 14, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility allowed residents to lose the ability to do daily activities — like bathing, dressing, and eating — when there was no medical reason for the decline. Good care helps residents keep the abilities they have. |
| Nov 14, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline. |
| Jan 26, 2024 | F · Potential for harm, facility-wide | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. |
| Jan 26, 2024 | F · Potential for harm, facility-wide | The facility did not designate a qualified infection preventionist — a trained person responsible for running the infection prevention and control program. |
| Jan 26, 2024 | F · Potential for harm, facility-wide | The facility did not keep all essential equipment working safely — things like heating and cooling systems, kitchen equipment, and medical devices. |
| Jan 26, 2024 | F · Potential for harm, facility-wide | The facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors. |
| Jan 26, 2024 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. |
| Jan 26, 2024 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. |
| Jan 26, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care. |
| Jan 26, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. |
| Jan 26, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems. |
| Jan 26, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not make sure special medical diets — like low-sodium or diabetic diets — were properly ordered by the resident's doctor or managed by a qualified dietitian as state law allows. |
| Nov 22, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (4 → 3).
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 1 | 0 | D |
| 2024 | 14 | 0 | F |
| 2025 | 1 | 1 | G ▲ |
| 2026 | 4 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
1 fine totaling $2,117.
| Date | Type | Amount / length |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 21, 2023 | Fine | $2,117 |
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
| Measure | This facility | Illinois avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.34 | 2.99 | 3.95 | top 23% in Illinois; bottom 28% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.88 | 0.63 | 0.69 | top 17% in Illinois; top 22% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 2.78 | 2.67 | 3.50 | top 28% in Illinois; bottom 20% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.70 | 0.56 | 0.48 | top 24% in Illinois; top 16% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 55.4 | 44.5 | 45.8 | bottom 22% in Illinois; bottom 24% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 37.5 | 41.8 | 42.9 | top 45% in Illinois; top 42% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.64, RN 0.96, weekend 3.03. Staffing rating: 3/5.
Self-reported quality measures
Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.
Quality measures rating: 2/5 · long-stay residents: 2/5 · short-stay residents: 2/5
Who owns this facility
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Diamond, Abraham | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 17% | 07/29/2013 |
| Diamond, Rachel | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 17% | 07/29/2013 |
| Kahn, Moshe | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 17% | 07/29/2013 |
| Kahn, Shoshana | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 17% | 07/29/2013 |
| Seleski, Miriam | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 17% | 07/29/2013 |
| Seleski, Samuel | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 17% | 07/29/2013 |
| Ahlgren, Susan | Individual | W-2 Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2020 |
| Ahlgren, Susan | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/06/2025 |
| Branshaw, Philip | Individual | W-2 Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/13/2018 |
| Branshaw, Philip | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/06/2025 |
| Clemons, Chiquita | Individual | W-2 Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/14/2022 |
| Diamond, Abraham | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/06/2025 |
| Diamond, Rachel | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/06/2025 |
| Kahn, Moshe | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/29/2013 |
| Kahn, Moshe | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/06/2025 |
| Kahn, Shoshana | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/06/2025 |
| Seleski, Miriam | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/06/2025 |
| Seleski, Samuel | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/06/2025 |
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
- "Can we tour the resident rooms, bathrooms, and common areas today, including areas not on the usual tour route?"
- "How many aides are on each shift, and how do you make sure every resident gets timely help with bathing, dressing, and meals?"
- "How do you make sure each resident's care follows the doctor's orders, and what changed after this citation?"
- "What are your visiting policies — can family visit any time the resident wants?"
- "How do you handle residents who need modified food textures, and how do you make those meals appetizing?"
- "How do you help residents maintain their daily living skills, and how do you measure whether it's working?"
- "What do you do daily to keep residents moving, and how do you help residents at risk of losing mobility?"
- "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
- "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"
Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Avantara Aurora | 0.7 mi | Aurora, IL | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| North Aurora Living & Rehab Ctr | 1.3 mi | North Aurora, IL | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Grove of Fox Valley,the | 2.3 mi | Aurora, IL | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| La Bella of Aurora | 2.6 mi | Aurora, IL | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Jennings Terrace | 3.3 mi | Aurora, IL | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Pearl of Orchard Valley | 3.4 mi | Aurora, IL | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Michaelsen Health Center | 4.4 mi | Batavia, IL | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Batavia Rehabilitation and Health Care Center | 4.6 mi | Batavia, IL | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Alden Courts of Waterford | 5.1 mi | Aurora, IL | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Alden of Waterford | 5.1 mi | Aurora, IL | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
All facilities in North Aurora →
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 146170.