CaliforniaBerkeley

Berkeley Pines Skilled Nursing Center

2223 Ashby Avenue, Berkeley, CA 94705 · Alameda County · 36 certified beds · avg 35 residents/day · certified since Feb 14, 1968

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
4.31
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5

⚠ The most recent standard health inspection was more than 2 years ago — conditions may have changed.

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (21)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Mar 14, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have a registered nurse on duty at least 8 hours a day, or did not have a registered nurse serving full-time as director of nursing.
Mar 14, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not employ enough qualified food and nutrition staff, including a qualified dietician, to properly run its food service.
Mar 14, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have enough support staff to safely and effectively run its food and nutrition service.
Mar 14, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician.
Mar 14, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature.
Mar 14, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Mar 14, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have a policy covering how food brought in by family and visitors is used and stored safely.
Mar 14, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Mar 14, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
Mar 14, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Mar 14, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not prepare and serve food in a form that meets each resident's individual needs — for example, chopped, pureed, or softened food for residents with chewing or swallowing problems.
Mar 14, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not make sure special medical diets — like low-sodium or diabetic diets — were properly ordered by the resident's doctor or managed by a qualified dietitian as state law allows.
Mar 14, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not maintain an effective pest control program to prevent or deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
Mar 14, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep all essential equipment working safely — things like heating and cooling systems, kitchen equipment, and medical devices.
May 12, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
May 12, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have a registered nurse on duty at least 8 hours a day, or did not have a registered nurse serving full-time as director of nursing.
May 12, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason.
Sep 13, 2019E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Sep 13, 2019E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
Sep 13, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Sep 13, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (3 → 14).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
201940E
202230E
2024140F

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityCalifornia avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)4.314.313.95top 38% in California; top 29% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.500.610.69top 46% in California; bottom 38% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing4.323.903.50top 20% in California; top 15% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.400.510.48top 45% in California; top 49% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)43.636.745.8bottom 28% in California; top 46% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)20.038.142.9top 19% in California; top 13% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.93, RN 0.46, weekend 3.94. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: —/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Leung, AllenIndividual5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest34%01/01/2015
Leung, AllenIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2015
Leung, AllenIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2015
Leung, AllenIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2015
Leung, AllenIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2015
Leung, BelindaIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2015
Leung, BelindaIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2015
Leung, BelindaIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2015
Leung, BelindaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2015
Leung, KennethIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2015
Leung, KennethIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2015
Leung, KennethIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2015
Leung, KennethIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2015

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Ashby Care Center0.5 miBerkeley, CA★★☆☆☆2/5
Elmwood Care Center0.6 miBerkeley, CA★★★☆☆3/5
Kyakameena Care Center0.7 miBerkeley, CA★★★☆☆3/5
Chaparral House1.8 miBerkeley, CA★★★★★4/5
The Rehabilitation Center of Oakland2.0 miOakland, CA★☆☆☆☆1/5
Piedmont Gardens Health Facility2.1 miOakland, CA★★★★★5/5
Oakland Healthcare & Wellness Center2.5 miOakland, CA★★★★★4/5
McClure Post Acute2.7 miOakland, CA★★★★★5/5
Medical Hill Healthcare Center2.7 miOakland, CA★★★★★4/5
Lake Merritt Healthcare Center LLC2.9 miOakland, CA★★☆☆☆2/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Berkeley →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 055892.