Kentucky ›Mount Washington

Green Meadows Health & Rehabilitation

Costs & paymentPlan a visit

310 Boxwood Run Road, Mount Washington, KY 40047 (opens Google Maps) · Bullitt County · (502) 538-3500· 122 certified beds · avg 99 residents/day · certified since Jul 22, 2009 · Medicare and Medicaid certified

Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →

Part of chain: BEDROCK HEALTHCARE (9 facilities, chain avg rating 1.4★)

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Mar 5, 2026
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.10
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

New to these records? How to read an inspection report →

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5 · how star ratings work →

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.

Inspection findings in the public record

Showing the latest 3 of 19 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.

  1. F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread

    The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. F-0812

  2. F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread

    The facility did not have a working call system — the button or cord residents use to summon help — in each resident's bathroom and bathing area. F-0919

  3. F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread

    The facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors. F-0921

View all 19 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Oct 25, 2024F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespreadThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812
Oct 25, 2024F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespreadThe facility did not have a working call system — the button or cord residents use to summon help — in each resident's bathroom and bathing area. · F-0919
Oct 25, 2024F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespreadThe facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors. · F-0921
Oct 25, 2024E · Potential for more than minimal harm, patternThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761
Oct 25, 2024D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered. · F-0582
Oct 25, 2024D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not properly inform residents or their representatives about arbitration agreements — contracts that give up the right to sue in court — including their right to refuse to sign. · F-0847
Oct 25, 2024D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880
Jun 28, 2019E · Potential for more than minimal harm, patternThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761
Jun 28, 2019E · Potential for more than minimal harm, patternThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812
Jun 28, 2019D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not update each resident's care assessment at least once every 3 months. These regular check-ins keep the resident's care plan matched to their current condition. · F-0638
Jun 28, 2019D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not enter each resident's assessment information into the required format and send it to the state within 7 days of completing the assessment, as the rules require. · F-0640
Jun 28, 2019D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not make sure resident assessments were done by a qualified health professional. Assessments guide all of a resident's care, so the person doing them must be properly trained. · F-0642
Jun 28, 2019D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656
Jun 28, 2019D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657
Jun 28, 2019D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · F-0658
Jun 28, 2019D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · F-0690
Jun 28, 2019D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · F-0755
Jun 28, 2019D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. · F-0759
Jun 28, 2019D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880

Inspection trend by year

Citations by recorded inspection yearPublished citation counts, not a quality score · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2019
All citations: 12
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2024
All citations: 7
Serious citations (G–L): 0

All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
2019120E
202470F

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

How to file a complaint about care →

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

What these staffing numbers mean →

Nurse time, in contextAdjusted hours per resident per day · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01
This facilityKentucky averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 3.10
Kentucky average: 3.71
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 0.36
Kentucky average: 0.74
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 2.83
Kentucky average: 3.27
U.S. average: 3.50

All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.

MeasureThis facilityKentucky avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.103.713.95bottom 29% in Kentucky; bottom 17% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.360.740.69bottom 8% in Kentucky; bottom 17% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing2.833.273.50bottom 38% in Kentucky; bottom 22% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.260.530.48bottom 21% in Kentucky; bottom 25% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)26.846.445.8top 4% in Kentucky; top 9% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)45.541.842.9bottom 37% in Kentucky; bottom 43% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.37, RN 0.39, weekend 3.08.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.37 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 2/5.

Quality measures: assessments & claims

Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.

Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 2/5

Costs & payment

Price evidence · separate from quality

No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Green Meadows Health & Rehabilitation. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.

Calculate a stay from a quote you receive

Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.

Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.

Before you compare prices

  • Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
  • Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
  • Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.

Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price

Who owns this facility

How to read ownership records →

Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Lansilh Irrevocable TrustOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2024
Tky 2 SNF Operations Holdings LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%11/01/2024
Butler, LeonIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2024
Carver, DillionIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2024
Carver, DillionIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2024
Carver, DillionIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2024
Carver, DillionIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2024
Gottesman, DanielIndividualTrustee of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2024
Idels, ShimonIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2024
Idels, ShimonIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2024
Lustbader, JonathanIndividualTrustee of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2024
Schwartz, StevenIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2024
Schwartz, StevenIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2024
Tky 2 SNF Operations Holdings LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2024
Wathan, SherrieIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2024
Wathan, SherrieIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2024
Wathan, SherrieIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2024

All 17 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.

Other facilities in the same chain

CMS lists this facility under the chain Bedrock Healthcare — 9 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.

Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking.

Questions to ask on your visit

Full visit checklist →

Print visit checklist

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

  • "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
  • "Can you show me the call buttons in the bathrooms and bathing areas, and tell me your average response time when one is pressed?"
  • "Can we tour the whole building today, including resident bathrooms and common areas, not just the lobby?"
  • "Can you show me how medications are stored and secured on the units, including controlled drugs?"
  • "Before any service that isn't covered by Medicare or Medicaid, how will you notify us and get our agreement?"
  • "Is signing an arbitration agreement required for admission, and can we refuse it without affecting my family member's care?"
  • "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
  • "How do you track that every resident's quarterly assessment happens on time?"

Also worth asking anywhere

  • "Your weekend nurse staffing is reported below the Kentucky midpoint — how does the weekend schedule differ from a weekday?"
  • "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
  • "CMS reports 27% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
  • "The ownership record on file lists 17 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
  • "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"

Nearby facilities (12 closest of 43 within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Sanders Ridge Health Campus3.2 miMount Washington, KY★★★★★4/5
Glen Ridge Health Campus7.6 miLouisville, KY★★★★☆3/5
Wesley Manor7.7 miLouisville, KY★★★★☆4/5
Regency Nursing and Rehabilitation Center8.1 miLouisvile, KY★★★☆☆2/5
Jeffersontown Rehabilitation10.7 miJeffersontown, KY★★★★★5/5
Franciscan Health Care Center10.8 miLouisville, KY★★★☆☆2/5
Signature Healthcare of East Louisville11.6 miLouisville, KY★★☆☆☆2/5
Signature Healthcare of Spencer County12.1 miTaylorsville, KY★★☆☆☆2/5
Klondike Nursing and Rehabilitation Center12.1 miLouisville, KY★★★★☆3/5
The Springs at Stony Brook12.2 miLouisville, KY★★★★★4/5
Louisville East Post Acute12.8 miLouisville, KY★★★☆☆2/5
Seneca Place13.5 miLouisville, KY★★★★★4/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Mount Washington →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 185464.

This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).

Your research

Viewed & saved homes

Kept in this browser tab for this session. Choose to remember them only on a device you trust. Opening a record or comparison sends its usual page request.

Selected for comparison

Recently viewed

Prices entered in a cost worksheet stay on that page and are not saved. Privacy details