Kentucky ›Louisville

Glen Ridge Health Campus

Costs & paymentPlan a visit

6415 Calm River Way, Louisville, KY 40299 (opens Google Maps) · Jefferson County · (502) 297-8590· 70 certified beds · avg 63 residents/day · certified since Jul 17, 2006 · Medicare and Medicaid certified

Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →

Part of chain: TRILOGY HEALTH SERVICES (123 facilities, chain avg rating 4.2★)

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Jun 5, 2025
2
Serious findings on record
most recent May 2, 2019
$0
Fines, last 3 years
2.97
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

New to these records? How to read an inspection report →

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5 · how star ratings work →

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, isolated · May 2, 2019 · F-0656

The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.

Why it matters: Without a complete, working care plan, important needs can slip through the cracks and no one is accountable for results.

Severity (J): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.

Corrected: May 25, 2019 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, isolated · May 2, 2019 · F-0689

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (J): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.

Corrected: May 25, 2019 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

Inspection findings in the public record

Showing the latest 3 of 16 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.

  1. E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern

    The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. F-0759

  2. D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated

    The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. F-0641

  3. D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated

    The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. F-0695

View all 16 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Jun 5, 2025E · Potential for more than minimal harm, patternThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. · F-0759
Jun 5, 2025D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641
Jun 5, 2025D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695
Jun 5, 2025D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint · F-0600
Jun 5, 2025D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint · F-0609
Mar 15, 2024D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential. · F-0583
Mar 15, 2024D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not honor residents' right to voice complaints without discrimination or retaliation, or did not have a working complaint process that resolves issues promptly. · F-0585
Mar 15, 2024D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684
Mar 15, 2024D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not provide proper foot care for residents. Foot care includes routine care like nail trimming and attention to foot problems, which matter greatly for older adults. · F-0687
Mar 15, 2024D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint · F-0677
Mar 15, 2024D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689
Mar 15, 2024D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint · F-0755
May 2, 2019▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, isolatedThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656
May 2, 2019▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, isolatedThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689
May 2, 2019D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641
May 2, 2019D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (4 → 3).

Citations by recorded inspection yearPublished citation counts, not a quality score · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2019
All citations: 4
Serious citations (G–L): 2
2024
All citations: 7
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2025
All citations: 5
Serious citations (G–L): 0

All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
201942J ▲
202470D
202550E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

How to file a complaint about care →

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

What these staffing numbers mean →

Nurse time, in contextAdjusted hours per resident per day · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01
This facilityKentucky averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 2.97
Kentucky average: 3.71
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 1.04
Kentucky average: 0.74
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 2.64
Kentucky average: 3.27
U.S. average: 3.50

All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.

MeasureThis facilityKentucky avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)2.973.713.95bottom 19% in Kentucky; bottom 13% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours1.040.740.69top 13% in Kentucky; top 14% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing2.643.273.50bottom 21% in Kentucky; bottom 14% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.990.530.48top 7% in Kentucky; top 6% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)56.546.445.8bottom 18% in Kentucky; bottom 22% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)63.241.842.9bottom 14% in Kentucky; bottom 17% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.52, RN 1.23, weekend 3.13.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.52 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 2/5.

Quality measures: assessments & claims

Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Costs & payment

Price evidence · separate from quality

No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Glen Ridge Health Campus. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.

Calculate a stay from a quote you receive

Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.

Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.

Before you compare prices

  • Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
  • Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
  • Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.

Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price

Who owns this facility

How to read ownership records →

Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Continental Merger Sub LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest—10/01/2021
Northstar Healthcare Income INCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest—10/01/2021
Northstar Healthcare Income Operating Partnership LPOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest—10/01/2021
Trilogy Holdings Nt-Hci, LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest—10/01/2021
Barney, LeighIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2019
Bryant, WilliamIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE01/05/2016
Bufford, RandallIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2019
Conner, GregoryIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE06/03/2021
Corbin, KathyIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2015
Davis, DavidIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE08/21/2017
Fightmaster, LisaIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2015
Hawkins, MartyIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE03/06/2021
Keybank National AssociationOrganization5% or Greater Mortgage InterestNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2015
Mehaffey, ToddIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE01/31/2022
Pietrowski, CristinaIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE01/31/2022
Prosky, DannyIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2015
Streiff, MathieuIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2015
Trilogy Management Services LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2021

All 18 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.

Other facilities in the same chain

CMS lists this facility under the chain Trilogy Health Services — 123 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.

Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 122 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.

Questions to ask on your visit

Full visit checklist →

Print visit checklist

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

  • "Can you show me an example care plan, and how are families included when it's created and updated?"
  • "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
  • "What is your current medication error rate, and what have you changed to bring errors down?"
  • "Who completes resident assessments here, and how do you check them for accuracy?"
  • "How many residents here use oxygen or breathing equipment, and who checks that equipment each shift?"
  • "Tell me about this abuse or neglect citation — what happened, and what specific changes did you make afterward?"
  • "When abuse or theft is suspected, who do you notify, how fast, and how do you inform the family?"
  • "How do you protect residents' privacy, both in their medical records and in day-to-day care?"

Also worth asking anywhere

  • "Your weekend nurse staffing is reported below the Kentucky midpoint — how does the weekend schedule differ from a weekday?"
  • "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
  • "CMS reports 57% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
  • "The ownership record on file lists 18 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
  • "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"

Nearby facilities (12 closest of 56 within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Jeffersontown Rehabilitation3.2 miJeffersontown, KY★★★★★5/5
Signature Healthcare of East Louisville4.5 miLouisville, KY★★☆☆☆2/5
The Springs at Stony Brook5.3 miLouisville, KY★★★★★4/5
Klondike Nursing and Rehabilitation Center6.2 miLouisville, KY★★★★☆3/5
Louisville East Post Acute6.2 miLouisville, KY★★★☆☆2/5
Sanders Ridge Health Campus6.8 miMount Washington, KY★★★★★4/5
Wesley Manor6.8 miLouisville, KY★★★★☆4/5
Valhalla Post Acute6.9 miLouisville, KY★★☆☆☆1/5
Regency Nursing and Rehabilitation Center6.9 miLouisvile, KY★★★☆☆2/5
Seneca Place7.5 miLouisville, KY★★★★★4/5
Green Meadows Health & Rehabilitation7.6 miMount Washington, KY★★★☆☆3/5
Franciscan Health Care Center7.9 miLouisville, KY★★★☆☆2/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

Other facilities in the same county

CMS records place this facility in Jefferson, KY — 39 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.

Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.

All facilities in Louisville →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 185461.

Your research

Viewed & saved homes

Kept in this browser tab for this session. Choose to remember them only on a device you trust. Opening a record or comparison sends its usual page request.

Selected for comparison

Recently viewed

Prices entered in a cost worksheet stay on that page and are not saved. Privacy details