1101 Lyndon Lane, Louisville, KY 40222 (opens Google Maps) · Jefferson County · (502) 425-0331· 145 certified beds · avg 126 residents/day · certified since Dec 15, 1981 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
SFF
What Special Focus status means →
Part of chain: JOURNEY HEALTHCARE (32 facilities, chain avg rating 1.9★)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: —/5 · CMS overall rating: —/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
▲ Immediate jeopardy, isolated · Dec 14, 2025 · F-0656 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Why it matters: Without a complete, working care plan, important needs can slip through the cracks and no one is accountable for results.
Severity (J): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Sep 17, 2025 (Past Non-Compliance)
▲ Immediate jeopardy, isolated · Dec 14, 2025 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (J): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Sep 17, 2025 (Past Non-Compliance)
▲ Immediate jeopardy, isolated · Feb 13, 2025 · F-0655 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable.
Why it matters: In the critical first days, staff may not know a new resident's medications, diet, or fall risks.
Severity (J): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Mar 5, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Immediate jeopardy, isolated · Feb 13, 2025 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (J): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Mar 5, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
Showing the latest 3 of 22 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors. F-0921
The facility did not fully assess residents on time — a complete assessment of health, abilities, and needs is required when a resident is first admitted and at least once every 12 months after that. F-0636
The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. F-0842
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 12, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors. · F-0921 |
| Jan 12, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not fully assess residents on time — a complete assessment of health, abilities, and needs is required when a resident is first admitted and at least once every 12 months after that. · F-0636 |
| Jan 12, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · F-0842 |
| Dec 17, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · from a complaint · F-0761 |
| Dec 14, 2025 | ▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint · F-0656 |
| Dec 14, 2025 | ▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Jul 25, 2025 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Feb 13, 2025 | ▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, isolated | The facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable. · from a complaint · F-0655 |
| Feb 13, 2025 | ▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Feb 13, 2025 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not properly hold, secure, and manage residents' personal money that was deposited with it for safekeeping. Facilities holding residents' funds must keep careful, honest accounts. · F-0568 |
| Feb 13, 2025 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · F-0584 |
| Feb 13, 2025 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not observe each nurse aide's job performance or provide regular training as required. · F-0730 |
| Feb 13, 2025 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not electronically submit complete and accurate staffing information to the government, based on payroll and other verifiable records. · F-0851 |
| Feb 13, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Feb 13, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection. · F-0607 |
| Feb 13, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · F-0609 |
| Feb 13, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Feb 13, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · from a complaint · F-0761 |
| Feb 13, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility was not managed in a way that uses its money, staff, and resources effectively and efficiently to care for residents. · from a complaint · F-0835 |
| Aug 10, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint · F-0656 |
| Aug 10, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Aug 10, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. · from a complaint · F-0558 |
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (1 → 3).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 3 | 0 | E |
| 2025 | 16 | 4 | J ▲ |
| 2026 | 3 | 0 | E |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
3 fines totaling $20,563.
Every penalty CMS publishes for this facility in the 3-year window is listed —none excluded. The count and the dollar total come from two different CMS datasets and agree for this facility. Penalties older than the window are dropped by CMS before publication, not by us.
| Date | Type | Amount / length |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 13, 2025 | Fine | $3,218 |
| Feb 13, 2025 | Fine | $6,500 |
| Feb 13, 2025 | Fine | $10,845 |
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Kentucky avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.74 | 3.71 | 3.95 | top 33% in Kentucky; bottom 49% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.69 | 0.74 | 0.69 | top 40% in Kentucky; top 37% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.40 | 3.27 | 3.50 | top 28% in Kentucky; top 47% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.43 | 0.53 | 0.48 | bottom 47% in Kentucky; top 44% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 64.7 | 46.4 | 45.8 | bottom 7% in Kentucky; bottom 10% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 76.7 | 41.8 | 42.9 | bottom 4% in Kentucky; bottom 7% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.55, RN 0.65, weekend 3.22.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.55 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: —/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: —/5 · long-stay residents: —/5 · short-stay residents: —/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Lyndon Crossing, LLC. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journey CZ Ky Healthcare Holdings LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 100% | 08/01/2024 |
| Journey CZ of Ky LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 08/01/2024 |
| Beverly Enterprises - Pennsylvania, INC. | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/01/2024 |
| Beverly Enterprises LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2024 |
| Beverly Health and Rehabilitiation Services, INC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/01/2024 |
| Dempsey, Jordan | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/01/2024 |
| Dempsey, Jordan | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/13/2024 |
| Drumm Intermediary Sub Co LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/01/2024 |
| Drumm Merger Co | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/01/2024 |
| Drumm Merger Co Sub LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/01/2024 |
| Fillmore Strategic Investors LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/01/2024 |
| Geary Property Holdings LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/01/2024 |
| GPH Louisville Camelot LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Security Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/01/2024 |
| GPH Louisville Camelot LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/01/2024 |
| Journey CZ Management LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/01/2024 |
| Journey CZ Management LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/13/2024 |
| Kapoor, Sandeep | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/01/2024 |
| Kapoor, Sandeep | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/13/2024 |
| McGuinness, Bernard | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/01/2024 |
| Pearl Senior Care, LLC. | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2024 |
Showing 20 of 21 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 1 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
CMS lists this facility under the chain Journey Healthcare — 32 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 31 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Episcopal Church Home | 0.4 mi | Louisville, KY | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Signature Healthcare at Jefferson Manor Rehab & We | 0.7 mi | Louisville, KY | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Signature Healthcare at Jefferson Place Rehab & We | 0.8 mi | Louisville, KY | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Westport Place Health Campus | 1.5 mi | Louisville, KY | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| The Willows at Springhurst | 2.5 mi | Louisville, KY | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Sam Swope Care Center | 3.0 mi | Masonic Home, KY | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Louisville East Post Acute | 3.1 mi | Louisville, KY | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| The Springs at Stony Brook | 3.5 mi | Louisville, KY | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Seneca Place | 3.8 mi | Louisville, KY | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Signature Healthcare of East Louisville | 4.1 mi | Louisville, KY | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Klondike Nursing and Rehabilitation Center | 4.3 mi | Louisville, KY | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Cherokee Park Rehabilitation | 5.0 mi | Louisville, KY | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Jefferson, KY — 39 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 185165.
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details