KentuckyLouisville

Lyndon Crossing, LLC

1101 Lyndon Lane, Louisville, KY 40222 · Jefferson County · 145 certified beds · avg 126 residents/day · certified since Dec 15, 1981

SFF

Part of chain: JOURNEY HEALTHCARE (32 facilities, chain avg rating 1.9★)

/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
4
Serious findings on record
$20,563
Fines, last 3 years
3.74
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: —/5 · CMS overall rating: —/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Dec 14, 2025 · F-0656 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.

Why it matters: Without a complete, working care plan, important needs can slip through the cracks and no one is accountable for results.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Sep 17, 2025 (Past Non-Compliance)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Dec 14, 2025 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Sep 17, 2025 (Past Non-Compliance)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Feb 13, 2025 · F-0655 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable.

Why it matters: In the critical first days, staff may not know a new resident's medications, diet, or fall risks.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Mar 5, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Feb 13, 2025 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Mar 5, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (22)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Jan 12, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors.
Jan 12, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not fully assess residents on time — a complete assessment of health, abilities, and needs is required when a resident is first admitted and at least once every 12 months after that.
Jan 12, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.
Dec 17, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · from a complaint
Dec 14, 2025▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint
Dec 14, 2025▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Jul 25, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Feb 13, 2025▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable. · from a complaint
Feb 13, 2025▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Feb 13, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not properly hold, secure, and manage residents' personal money that was deposited with it for safekeeping. Facilities holding residents' funds must keep careful, honest accounts.
Feb 13, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Feb 13, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not observe each nurse aide's job performance or provide regular training as required.
Feb 13, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not electronically submit complete and accurate staffing information to the government, based on payroll and other verifiable records.
Feb 13, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Feb 13, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection.
Feb 13, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation.
Feb 13, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Feb 13, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · from a complaint
Feb 13, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility was not managed in a way that uses its money, staff, and resources effectively and efficiently to care for residents. · from a complaint
Aug 10, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint
Aug 10, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Aug 10, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. · from a complaint

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (1 → 3).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202330E
2025164J ▲
202630E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

3 fines totaling $20,563.

DateTypeAmount / length
Feb 13, 2025Fine$3,218
Feb 13, 2025Fine$6,500
Feb 13, 2025Fine$10,845

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityKentucky avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.743.713.95top 33% in Kentucky; bottom 49% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.690.740.69top 40% in Kentucky; top 37% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.403.273.50top 28% in Kentucky; top 47% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.430.530.48bottom 47% in Kentucky; top 44% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)64.746.445.8bottom 7% in Kentucky; bottom 10% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)76.741.842.9bottom 4% in Kentucky; bottom 7% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.55, RN 0.65, weekend 3.22. Staffing rating: —/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: —/5 · long-stay residents: —/5 · short-stay residents: —/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Journey CZ Ky Healthcare Holdings LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest100%08/01/2024
Journey CZ of Ky LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%08/01/2024
Beverly Enterprises - Pennsylvania, INC.OrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2024
Beverly Enterprises LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2024
Beverly Health and Rehabilitiation Services, INCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2024
Dempsey, JordanIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2024
Dempsey, JordanIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/13/2024
Drumm Intermediary Sub Co LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2024
Drumm Merger CoOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2024
Drumm Merger Co Sub LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2024
Fillmore Strategic Investors LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2024
Geary Property Holdings LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2024
GPH Louisville Camelot LLCOrganization5% or Greater Security InterestNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2024
GPH Louisville Camelot LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2024
Journey CZ Management LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2024
Journey CZ Management LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/13/2024
Kapoor, SandeepIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2024
Kapoor, SandeepIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/13/2024
McGuinness, BernardIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2024
Pearl Senior Care, LLC.OrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2024

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
The Episcopal Church Home0.4 miLouisville, KY★★★★☆3/5
Signature Healthcare at Jefferson Manor Rehab & We0.7 miLouisville, KY★★★★★4/5
Signature Healthcare at Jefferson Place Rehab & We0.8 miLouisville, KY★★★★☆3/5
Westport Place Health Campus1.5 miLouisville, KY★★★★★4/5
The Willows at Springhurst2.5 miLouisville, KY★★★☆☆2/5
Sam Swope Care Center3.0 miMasonic Home, KY★★☆☆☆2/5
Louisville East Post Acute3.1 miLouisville, KY★★★☆☆2/5
The Springs at Stony Brook3.5 miLouisville, KY★★★★★4/5
Seneca Place3.8 miLouisville, KY★★★★★4/5
Signature Healthcare of East Louisville4.1 miLouisville, KY★★☆☆☆2/5
Klondike Nursing and Rehabilitation Center4.3 miLouisville, KY★★★★☆3/5
Cherokee Park Rehabilitation5.0 miLouisville, KY★★☆☆☆2/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Louisville →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 185165.