How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
71 44 Yellowstone Boulevard, Forest Hills, NY 11375 (opens Google Maps) · Queens County · (718) 544-4300· 100 certified beds · avg 87 residents/day · certified since Nov 18, 1968 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Showing the latest 3 of 16 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. F-0584
The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. F-0658
The facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it. F-0697
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 11, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · F-0584 |
| Jun 11, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · F-0658 |
| Jun 11, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it. · F-0697 |
| Jun 11, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Dec 21, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not make its inspection results easy for residents to see, or made it hard for residents to contact advocacy agencies like the ombudsman. · F-0577 |
| Dec 21, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · F-0584 |
| Dec 21, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not honor residents' right to make their own choices about their daily lives, such as when to wake up, what to eat, or how to spend their time. · F-0561 |
| Dec 21, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Dec 21, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Dec 21, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide or obtain laboratory tests when a doctor ordered them, or did not promptly report the results back to the doctor who ordered them. · F-0773 |
| Dec 21, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Dec 21, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Dec 21, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors. · F-0921 |
| Oct 29, 2021 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Oct 29, 2021 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Oct 29, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · F-0550 |
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (9 → 4).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 3 | 0 | F |
| 2023 | 9 | 0 | E |
| 2025 | 4 | 0 | E |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | New York avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.79 | 3.58 | 3.95 | top 33% in New York; top 49% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.61 | 0.68 | 0.69 | top 43% in New York; top 47% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.46 | 3.13 | 3.50 | top 26% in New York; top 44% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.43 | 0.48 | 0.48 | top 37% in New York; top 44% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 30.8 | 40.3 | 45.8 | top 31% in New York; top 16% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 21.4 | 39.8 | 42.9 | top 12% in New York; top 16% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.45, RN 0.55, weekend 3.14.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.45 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 4/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Forest Hills Care Center. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Partnership
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bal, Satwinder | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2022 |
| Bal, Satwinder | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2022 |
| Landa, Benjamin | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/31/2017 |
| Landa, Benjamin | Individual | General Partnership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/31/2017 |
| Landa, Benjamin | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/31/2017 |
| Landa, Judy | Individual | General Partnership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/30/2015 |
| Landa, Judy | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/30/2015 |
| Landa, Sheya | Individual | General Partnership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/30/2015 |
| Landa, Sheya | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/30/2015 |
| Pollak, Renee | Individual | General Partnership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/1997 |
| Rahman, Mohammed | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/02/2018 |
| Rahman, Mohammed | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2018 |
All 12 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fairview Nursing Care Center INC. | 0.0 mi | Forest Hills, NY | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Forest View Center for Rehabilitation & Nursing | 0.0 mi | Forest Hills, NY | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Rego Park Nursing Home | 1.3 mi | Flushing, NY | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Dry Harbor Nursing Home | 1.8 mi | Middle Village, NY | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Park Terrace Care Center | 2.2 mi | Corona, NY | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Jamaica Hospital Nursing Home Co INC | 2.2 mi | Jamaica, NY | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Silvercrest | 2.6 mi | Jamaica, NY | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Franklin Center for Rehabilitation and Nursing | 2.7 mi | Flushing, NY | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Meadow Park Rehabilitation and Health Center LLC | 2.8 mi | Flushing, NY | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Central Queens Rehab & Nursing Center | 2.8 mi | Maspeth, NY | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Margaret Tietz Center for Nursing Care INC | 3.0 mi | Jamaica, NY | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Highland Care Center | 3.0 mi | Jamaica, NY | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Queens, NY — 56 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 335139.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details