How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
715 N Mill St, Hartford City, IN 47348 (opens Google Maps) · Blackford County · (765) 348-2273· 78 certified beds · avg 35 residents/day · certified since Mar 19, 2002 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: ENVIVE HEALTHCARE (12 facilities, chain avg rating 2.2★)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Showing the latest 3 of 22 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint F-0609
The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint F-0610
The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. F-0550
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Nov 7, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint · F-0609 |
| Nov 7, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint · F-0610 |
| Sep 26, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · F-0550 |
| Sep 26, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility allowed residents to lose the ability to do daily activities — like bathing, dressing, and eating — when there was no medical reason for the decline. Good care helps residents keep the abilities they have. · F-0676 |
| Sep 26, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677 |
| Sep 26, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration. · F-0692 |
| Aug 6, 2025 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors. · from a complaint · F-0921 |
| Mar 13, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · from a complaint · F-0761 |
| Nov 8, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint · F-0684 |
| Nov 8, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems. · F-0756 |
| Nov 8, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. · F-0758 |
| Nov 8, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Jun 17, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint · F-0609 |
| Dec 19, 2023 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not have a registered nurse on duty at least 8 hours a day, or did not have a registered nurse serving full-time as director of nursing. · F-0727 |
| Dec 19, 2023 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Dec 19, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not give residents reasonable access to and privacy in using ways to communicate, such as phones, mail, and email. Residents have the right to stay in touch with the outside world privately. · F-0576 |
| Dec 19, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide care that took into account residents' past trauma or their cultural backgrounds. Care is supposed to be sensitive to what residents have lived through and where they come from. · F-0699 |
| Dec 19, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the right treatment and services for residents with dementia or signs of dementia. Dementia care requires specific approaches, training, and patience. · F-0744 |
| Dec 19, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. · F-0758 |
| Dec 19, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Dec 19, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not educate residents and staff about COVID-19 vaccination, offer the vaccine to those eligible after that education, or properly document everyone's vaccination status. · F-0887 |
| Nov 3, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the right treatment and services for residents with dementia or signs of dementia. Dementia care requires specific approaches, training, and patience. · from a complaint · F-0744 |
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (3 → 4).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 9 | 0 | F |
| 2024 | 5 | 0 | D |
| 2025 | 8 | 0 | F |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Indiana avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.00 | 3.42 | 3.95 | bottom 28% in Indiana; bottom 14% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.91 | 0.62 | 0.69 | top 12% in Indiana; top 20% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 2.81 | 3.01 | 3.50 | bottom 46% in Indiana; bottom 21% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.87 | 0.47 | 0.48 | top 6% in Indiana; top 9% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 20.0 | 45.9 | 45.8 | top 1% in Indiana; top 3% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 0.0 | 40.4 | 42.9 | top 1% in Indiana; top 1% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.29, RN 1.00, weekend 3.09.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.29 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 3/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 3/5 · short-stay residents: —/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Envive of Hartford City. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bridgewater Property Holdings LLC | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2022 |
| Envive Nursing Holdings, LLC | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2022 |
| Anderson, Robert | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2024 |
| Anderson, Robert | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2024 |
| Blue Management Services LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2024 |
| Borne-Bauman, Candice | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2022 |
| Borne-Bauman, Candice | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2022 |
| Bridgewater Property Holdings LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2022 |
| Envive Healthcare LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2022 |
| Envive Nursing Holdings, LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2022 |
| Envive Nursing Holdings, LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2022 |
| First Bank of Berne | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2022 |
| Flueckiger, Russell | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2022 |
| Flueckiger, Russell | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2022 |
| Jackman, Sarah | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/23/2023 |
| Jackman, Sarah | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/23/2023 |
| Lehman, Scott | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2022 |
| Lehman, Scott | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2022 |
| LT Care Acquisition Corp | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2022 |
| LT Care Acquisition Corp | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2022 |
Showing 20 of 28 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 8 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
CMS lists this facility under the chain Envive Healthcare — 12 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 11 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Waters of Hartford City Skilled Nursing Facility | 1.7 mi | Hartford City, IN | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| University Nursing Center | 7.3 mi | Upland, IN | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Waters of Dunkirk Skilled Nursing Facility, the | 9.6 mi | Dunkirk, IN | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Albany Health Care & Rehabilitation Center | 12.3 mi | Albany, IN | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Twin City Health Care | 13.1 mi | Gas City, IN | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Signature Healthcare of Muncie | 15.8 mi | Muncie, IN | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Heritage Pointe of Warren | 16.4 mi | Warren, IN | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Morrison Woods Health Campus | 16.5 mi | Muncie, IN | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Colonial Oaks Health Care Center | 16.5 mi | Marion, IN | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Westminster Village Muncie INC | 16.6 mi | Muncie, IN | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Waters of Muncie, the | 16.8 mi | Muncie, IN | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Bethel Pointe Health and Rehab | 16.8 mi | Muncie, IN | ★★★★★ | 4/5 |
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 155699.
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details