How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
2 Medical Plaza, Glen Cove, NY 11542 (opens Google Maps) · Nassau County · (516) 671-0858· 102 certified beds · avg 93 residents/day · certified since Jan 1, 1967 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: PARAGON HEALTHNET (11 facilities, chain avg rating 4.5★)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★★5/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Showing the latest 3 of 8 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. F-0656
The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. F-0842
The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. F-0657
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 28, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Apr 28, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · F-0842 |
| Jan 2, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657 |
| Jan 2, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Sep 25, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · from a complaint · F-0690 |
| Sep 25, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it. · from a complaint · F-0697 |
| Sep 25, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Sep 25, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (2 → 2).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 4 | 0 | D |
| 2025 | 2 | 0 | D |
| 2026 | 2 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | New York avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 2.90 | 3.58 | 3.95 | bottom 19% in New York; bottom 11% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.66 | 0.68 | 0.69 | top 36% in New York; top 40% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 2.64 | 3.13 | 3.50 | bottom 25% in New York; bottom 14% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.62 | 0.48 | 0.48 | top 22% in New York; top 22% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 29.4 | 40.3 | 45.8 | top 26% in New York; top 13% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 39.1 | 39.8 | 42.9 | bottom 47% in New York; top 45% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.13, RN 0.95, weekend 3.76.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (4.13 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 3/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Emerge Nursing and Rehabilitation at Glen Cove. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Advanced Nursing and Rehabilitation at Glen Cove LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 05/05/2018 |
| Laufer, Issac | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 100% | 05/02/2018 |
| Enella, Jerome | Individual | W-2 Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/08/2008 |
| Polimeni, Lisa | Individual | W-2 Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/30/2018 |
All 4 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
CMS lists this facility under the chain Paragon Healthnet — 11 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 10 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Glen Cove Center for Nursing and Rehabilitation | 0.0 mi | Glen Cove, NY | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Glengariff Health Care Center | 0.7 mi | Glen Cove, NY | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Sands Point Center for Health and Rehabilitation | 4.2 mi | Port Washington, NY | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Sunharbor Manor | 5.8 mi | Roslyn Heights, NY | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| The Osborn | 7.8 mi | Rye, NY | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| The Grand Rehabilitation and Nursing at Great Neck | 7.9 mi | Great Neck, NY | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Northwell Health Stern Family Center for Rehabilit | 8.0 mi | Manhasset, NY | ★★★★★ | 3/5 | |
| Sarah Neuman Center for Rehabilitation and Nursing | 8.0 mi | Mamaroneck, NY | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Highfield Gardens Care Center of Great Neck | 8.2 mi | Great Neck, NY | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| United Hebrew Geriatric Center | 8.3 mi | New Rochelle, NY | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Glen Island Center for Nursing and Rehabilitation | 8.5 mi | New Rochelle, NY | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Bayberry Nursing Home | 8.6 mi | New Rochelle, NY | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Nassau, NY — 36 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 335141.
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details