Florida ›Pompano Beach

Deerfield Beach Health and Rehabilitation Center

Costs & paymentPlan a visit

401 East Sample Road, Pompano Beach, FL 33064 (opens Google Maps) · Broward County · (954) 941-4100· 194 certified beds · avg 189 residents/day · certified since Oct 26, 1988 · Medicare and Medicaid certified

Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →

Part of chain: FLORIDA INSTITUTE FOR LONG-TERM CARE (17 facilities, chain avg rating 2.2★)

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Mar 6, 2025
2
Serious findings on record
most recent Nov 9, 2023
$36,089
Fines, last 3 years
3.58
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

New to these records? How to read an inspection report →

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5 · how star ratings work →

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, isolated · Nov 9, 2023 · F-0692

The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.

Why it matters: Malnutrition and dehydration can quickly weaken a resident and lead to serious complications.

Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.

Corrected: Dec 9, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, isolated · Nov 9, 2023 · F-0693

The facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes.

Why it matters: Unnecessary or poorly managed feeding tubes can cause serious complications like lung infections and take away the ability to eat normally.

Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.

Corrected: Dec 9, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

Inspection findings in the public record

Showing the latest 3 of 26 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.

  1. D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated

    The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint F-0584

  2. E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern

    The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. F-0584

  3. D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated

    The facility did not honor residents' right to voice complaints without discrimination or retaliation, or did not have a working complaint process that resolves issues promptly. F-0585

View all 26 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Nov 18, 2025D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint · F-0584
Mar 6, 2025E · Potential for more than minimal harm, patternThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · F-0584
Mar 6, 2025D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not honor residents' right to voice complaints without discrimination or retaliation, or did not have a working complaint process that resolves issues promptly. · F-0585
Mar 6, 2025D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration. · F-0692
Mar 6, 2025D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695
Mar 6, 2025D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not provide care that took into account residents' past trauma or their cultural backgrounds. Care is supposed to be sensitive to what residents have lived through and where they come from. · F-0699
Mar 6, 2025D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care. · F-0725
Mar 6, 2025D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761
Mar 6, 2025D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not have a written plan describing how it runs its quality improvement program — the ongoing process of finding problems in care and fixing them. · F-0865
Nov 13, 2024D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not keep all essential equipment working safely — things like heating and cooling systems, kitchen equipment, and medical devices. · from a complaint · F-0908
Nov 9, 2023▲ G · Actual harm, isolatedThe facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration. · F-0692
Nov 9, 2023▲ G · Actual harm, isolatedThe facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes. · F-0693
Nov 9, 2023D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · F-0584
Nov 9, 2023D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677
Nov 9, 2023D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not provide proper foot care for residents. Foot care includes routine care like nail trimming and attention to foot problems, which matter greatly for older adults. · F-0687
Nov 9, 2023D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline. · F-0688
Nov 9, 2023D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · F-0690
Nov 9, 2023D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695
Nov 9, 2023D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. · F-0759
Nov 9, 2023D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not have firmly secured handrails on both sides of its hallways. · F-0924
Jul 21, 2022E · Potential for more than minimal harm, patternThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · F-0584
Jul 21, 2022E · Potential for more than minimal harm, patternThe facility did not dispose of garbage and refuse properly. · F-0814
Jul 21, 2022D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677
Jul 21, 2022D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes. · F-0693
Jul 21, 2022D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail. · F-0698
Jul 21, 2022D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (10 → 8).

Citations by recorded inspection yearPublished citation counts, not a quality score · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2022
All citations: 6
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2023
All citations: 10
Serious citations (G–L): 2
2024
All citations: 1
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2025
All citations: 9
Serious citations (G–L): 0

All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202260E
2023102G ▲
202410D
202590E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

How to file a complaint about care →

1 fine totaling $36,089.

Every penalty CMS publishes for this facility in the 3-year window is listed —none excluded. The count and the dollar total come from two different CMS datasets and agree for this facility. Penalties older than the window are dropped by CMS before publication, not by us.

DateTypeAmount / length
Nov 9, 2023Fine$36,089

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

What these staffing numbers mean →

Nurse time, in contextAdjusted hours per resident per day · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01
This facilityFlorida averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 3.58
Florida average: 4.03
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 0.78
Florida average: 0.76
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 3.33
Florida average: 3.68
U.S. average: 3.50

All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.

MeasureThis facilityFlorida avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.584.033.95bottom 23% in Florida; bottom 41% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.780.760.69top 36% in Florida; top 29% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.333.683.50bottom 26% in Florida; bottom 49% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.540.530.48top 38% in Florida; top 29% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)29.241.445.8top 21% in Florida; top 13% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)43.646.042.9top 45% in Florida; bottom 46% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.32, RN 0.73, weekend 3.09.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.32 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 3/5.

Quality measures: assessments & claims

Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5

Costs & payment

Price evidence · separate from quality

No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Deerfield Beach Health and Rehabilitation Center. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.

Calculate a stay from a quote you receive

Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.

Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.

Before you compare prices

  • Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
  • Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
  • Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.

Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price

Who owns this facility

How to read ownership records →

Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →

Non profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Fi-Broward Nursing, LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%12/23/2002
Florida Institute for Long Term Care LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest100%12/23/2002
Anu Health Management LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2009
Anu Health Management LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/02/2025
CHR Pompano Beach Broward LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2003
Consulting Support Services, LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE06/28/2011
Consulting Support Services, LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/02/2025
Facey, ReitaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2019
Facey, ReitaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2019
Facility Support Company, LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE12/13/2010
Facility Support Company, LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/20/2025
Florida Institute for Long Term Care LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/02/2025
Jaffe, HowardIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2014
Kane Financial Services, LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE06/06/2012
Kane Financial Services, LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/20/2025
Katz-Hall, KathyIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2014
Mullarkey, JamesIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2014
Richmond, PennyIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2014
Select Rehabilitation, LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE08/19/2016
Thomas, AntonioIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE03/10/2025

Showing 20 of 21 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 1 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.

Other facilities in the same chain

CMS lists this facility under the chain Florida Institute for Long-Term Care — 17 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.

Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 16 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.

Questions to ask on your visit

Full visit checklist →

Print visit checklist

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

  • "How do you monitor residents' weight and eating, and what happens when someone starts losing weight?"
  • "How do you decide when a feeding tube is truly needed, and how do staff care for residents who have one?"
  • "Can we tour the resident rooms, bathrooms, and common areas today, including areas not on the usual tour route?"
  • "Walk me through what happens when a resident or family files a grievance — who responds and how fast?"
  • "How many residents here use oxygen or breathing equipment, and who checks that equipment each shift?"
  • "How do you learn about each resident's background and history, and how does that shape their care?"
  • "What is your nurse and aide staffing ratio on each shift, including nights and weekends?"
  • "Can you show me how medications are stored and secured on the units, including controlled drugs?"

Also worth asking anywhere

  • "Your weekend nurse staffing is reported below the Florida midpoint — how does the weekend schedule differ from a weekday?"
  • "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
  • "CMS reports 29% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
  • "The ownership record on file lists 21 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
  • "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"

Nearby facilities (12 closest of 50 within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Pompano Health and Rehabilitation Center0.3 miPompano Beach, FL★★☆☆☆2/5
Aviata at the Sea - Pompano Beach3.1 miPompano Beach, FL★★☆☆☆1/5
Childrens Comprehensive Care Center INC3.2 miPompano Beach, FL★☆☆☆☆2/5
John Knox Village of Pompano Beach3.7 miPompano Beach, FL★★★★☆3/5
Solaris Healthcare Coconut Creek3.9 miCoconut Creek, FL★★★★☆4/5
Stratford Court of Boca Raton4.0 miBoca Raton, FL★★★★★3/5
Willowbrooke Court Skilled Care Center - Edgewater4.2 miBoca Raton, FL★★★★★5/5
Margate Health and Rehabilitation Center5.3 miMargate, FL★★★★★4/5
Boca Circle Rehabilitation Center5.5 miBoca Raton, FL★★☆☆☆2/5
Encore at Boca Raton Rehabilitation and Nursing Ce5.8 miBoca Raton, FL★★★☆☆2/5
Boca Raton Rehabilitation Center5.9 miBoca Raton, FL★★☆☆☆2/5
Savoy at Fort Lauderdale Rehabilitation and Nursin5.9 miFort Lauderdale, FL★★★☆☆2/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

Other facilities in the same county

CMS records place this facility in Broward, FL — 33 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.

Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.

All facilities in Pompano Beach →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 105622.

Your research

Viewed & saved homes

Kept in this browser tab for this session. Choose to remember them only on a device you trust. Opening a record or comparison sends its usual page request.

Selected for comparison

Recently viewed

Prices entered in a cost worksheet stay on that page and are not saved. Privacy details