Danville Post-Acute Rehab

Name: Danville Post-Acute Rehab
Address: 336 DIABLO ROAD, Danville, CA, 94526, US
Telephone: 9258374566

336 Diablo Road, Danville, CA 94526 · Contra Costa County · 54 certified beds · avg 42 residents/day · certified since May 1, 1989

Part of chain: THE ENSIGN GROUP (342 facilities, chain avg rating 3.2★)

3/5

Health inspection rating (on-site)

Serious findings on record

Fines, last 3 years

3.96

Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (17)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

Date	Severity	What the facility was cited for
Jun 11, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Dec 30, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not let a resident or their legal representative see or buy copies of the resident's own records. · from a complaint
Oct 11, 2024	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Oct 11, 2024	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Oct 11, 2024	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Oct 11, 2024	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.
Oct 11, 2024	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
Oct 11, 2024	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Oct 11, 2024	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Oct 11, 2024	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.
Oct 11, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential.
Oct 11, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Oct 11, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Oct 11, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not safely and appropriately administer IV fluids (fluids given through a vein) for residents who needed them.
Oct 11, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
May 20, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Feb 13, 2019	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.

Inspection trend by year

Year	Citations	Worst severity that year
2019	1	E
2024	15	E
2025	1	D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

Measure	This facility	California avg	U.S. avg	Where it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)	3.96	4.31	3.95	bottom 38% in California; top 41% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours	0.60	0.61	0.69	top 33% in California; top 48% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing	3.49	3.90	3.50	bottom 29% in California; top 43% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)	0.49	0.51	0.48	top 32% in California; top 34% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)	30.6	36.7	45.8	top 31% in California; top 15% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)	40.0	38.1	42.9	bottom 47% in California; top 46% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.53, RN 0.68, weekend 3.99. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / manager	Type	Role	Stake	Since
Burnam, Soon	Individual	Corporate Officer	NOT APPLICABLE	11/08/2022
Ensign Services INC	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	10/31/2022
Keetch, Chad	Individual	Corporate Officer	NOT APPLICABLE	03/01/2011
Kyros In-Home Care & Registry INC	Organization	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	02/01/2023
Malani, Narendra	Individual	Managing Control - Governing Body	NOT APPLICABLE	02/01/2023
Malani, Narendra	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	02/01/2023
Malani, Narendra	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	06/27/2025
Monette, Cory	Individual	Corporate Officer	NOT APPLICABLE	02/01/2023
Port, Barry	Individual	Individual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	06/27/2025
Sato, Ami	Individual	Corporate Officer	NOT APPLICABLE	09/09/2024
Valle, Leon	Individual	Managing Control - Governing Body	NOT APPLICABLE	02/01/2023
Valle, Leon	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	02/01/2023
Valle, Leon	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	06/27/2025
Willits, Adam	Individual	Corporate Director	NOT APPLICABLE	02/01/2023

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

"Tell me about this abuse or neglect citation — what happened, and what specific changes did you make afterward?"
"If I ask for a copy of my family member's records, how quickly will I get them and what does it cost?"
"Who completes resident assessments here, and how do you check them for accuracy?"
"How many aides are on each shift, and how do you make sure every resident gets timely help with bathing, dressing, and meals?"
"How does your pharmacist review residents' medications, and how quickly can you fill new or urgent prescriptions?"
"What is your approach to psychiatric medications — how do you try non-drug options first and work to reduce doses over time?"
"What is your current medication error rate, and what have you changed to bring errors down?"
"Can you show me how medications are stored and secured on the units, including controlled drugs?"
"What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
"Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

Facility	Distance	City	Overall	Inspection
Tice Valley Post Acute	5.3 mi	Walnut Creek, CA	★★★★★	4/5
Walnut Creek Skilled Nursing & Rehabilitation Cent	5.4 mi	Walnut Creek, CA	★★☆☆☆	2/5
Rossmoor Post Acute	5.4 mi	Walnut Creek, CA	★★★★★	4/5
The Reutlinger Community	5.7 mi	Danville, CA	★★★★☆	4/5
Tampico Healthcare Center	6.7 mi	Walnut Creek, CA	★★★★☆	3/5
La Casa via Transitional Care Center	6.8 mi	Walnut Creek, CA	★★★★★	4/5
Shadelands Post Acute	7.5 mi	Walnut Creek, CA	★★★★☆	3/5
Moraga Post Acute	7.6 mi	Moraga, CA	★★★★★	4/5
Pleasant Hill Post Acute	8.3 mi	Pleasant Hill, CA	★★★★☆	3/5
Rosewood Post Acute	8.6 mi	Pleasant Hill, CA	★★★★☆	4/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Danville →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 555376.

The Care File

Visit checklist — Danville Post-Acute Rehab

336 Diablo Road, Danville, CA 94526 · 9258374566

Health inspection rating 3/5 · CMS overall 4/5· Fines (3y): $0

Questions for the administrator:

☐ "Tell me about this abuse or neglect citation — what happened, and what specific changes did you make afterward?"
☐ "If I ask for a copy of my family member's records, how quickly will I get them and what does it cost?"
☐ "Who completes resident assessments here, and how do you check them for accuracy?"
☐ "How many aides are on each shift, and how do you make sure every resident gets timely help with bathing, dressing, and meals?"
☐ "How does your pharmacist review residents' medications, and how quickly can you fill new or urgent prescriptions?"
☐ "What is your approach to psychiatric medications — how do you try non-drug options first and work to reduce doses over time?"
☐ "What is your current medication error rate, and what have you changed to bring errors down?"
☐ "Can you show me how medications are stored and secured on the units, including controlled drugs?"
☐ "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
☐ "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"

While you're there, notice:

☐ Smell and cleanliness in hallways, not just the lobby
☐ How staff speak to residents; call lights answered promptly
☐ Residents up, dressed, and engaged (visit mealtimes and a weekend if you can)

Data: CMS Provider Data Catalog, version 2026-08-01 · CCN 555376 · Verify at medicare.gov/care-compare · Printed from The Care File (thecarefile.com)