Tice Valley Post Acute

Name: Tice Valley Post Acute
Address: 1975 TICE VALLEY BLVD., Walnut Creek, CA, 94595, US
Telephone: 9259060200

1975 Tice Valley Blvd., Walnut Creek, CA 94595 · Contra Costa County · 120 certified beds · avg 117 residents/day · certified since Aug 7, 1997

Part of chain: PACS GROUP (274 facilities, chain avg rating 2.9★)

4/5

Health inspection rating (on-site)

Serious findings on record

Fines, last 3 years

4.02

Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (28)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

Date	Severity	What the facility was cited for
Jun 17, 2026	F · Potential for harm, facility-wide	The facility was not properly licensed, or did not operate in compliance with federal, state, and local laws, regulations, and accepted professional standards. · from a complaint
Jun 17, 2026	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint
May 7, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint
Dec 11, 2025	F · Potential for harm, facility-wide	The facility was not properly licensed, or did not operate in compliance with federal, state, and local laws, regulations, and accepted professional standards.
Dec 11, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Dec 11, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail.
Dec 11, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not prepare and serve food in a form that meets each resident's individual needs — for example, chopped, pureed, or softened food for residents with chewing or swallowing problems.
Dec 11, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jan 15, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Jun 20, 2024	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Jun 20, 2024	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Jun 20, 2024	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Jun 20, 2024	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jun 20, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility allowed residents to lose the ability to do daily activities — like bathing, dressing, and eating — when there was no medical reason for the decline. Good care helps residents keep the abilities they have.
May 17, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Sep 12, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint
Aug 16, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Aug 16, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint
Mar 4, 2022	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Mar 4, 2022	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.
Mar 4, 2022	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Mar 4, 2022	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
Mar 4, 2022	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Mar 4, 2022	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature.
Mar 4, 2022	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Mar 4, 2022	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Mar 4, 2022	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems.
Mar 4, 2022	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (5 → 5).

Year	Citations	Worst severity that year
2022	10	E
2023	3	D
2024	6	E
2025	6	F
2026	3	F

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

Measure	This facility	California avg	U.S. avg	Where it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)	4.02	4.31	3.95	bottom 43% in California; top 39% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours	0.60	0.61	0.69	top 33% in California; top 49% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing	3.58	3.90	3.50	bottom 37% in California; top 38% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)	0.49	0.51	0.48	top 31% in California; top 33% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)	36.5	36.7	45.8	bottom 49% in California; top 28% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)	36.8	38.1	42.9	top 50% in California; top 41% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.25, RN 0.63, weekend 3.78. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / manager	Type	Role	Stake	Since
Jergensen, Joshua	Individual	Managing Control - Governing Body	NOT APPLICABLE	02/01/2024
Jergensen, Joshua	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	01/01/2024
Londono, Adriano	Individual	Managing Control - Governing Body	NOT APPLICABLE	08/03/2025
Londono, Adriano	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	08/03/2025
Londono, Adriano	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	08/03/2025
Mitchell, John	Individual	Managing Control - Governing Body	NOT APPLICABLE	02/01/2024
Mitchell, John	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	01/01/2024
Oyler, Abraham	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	02/01/2025
Oyler, Abraham	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	12/05/2025
Patel, Ashish	Individual	Managing Control - Governing Body	NOT APPLICABLE	01/01/2025
Patel, Ashish	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	04/01/2024
Patel, Ashish	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	12/05/2025
Providence Administrative Consulting Services INC	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	02/01/2024
Truist Bank	Organization	5% or Greater Mortgage Interest	NOT APPLICABLE	12/07/2023

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

"Can you tell me about this citation and confirm your license and compliance status today?"
"How does your pharmacist review residents' medications, and how quickly can you fill new or urgent prescriptions?"
"How many aides are on each shift, and how do you make sure every resident gets timely help with bathing, dressing, and meals?"
"How do you coordinate and monitor care for residents who receive dialysis?"
"How do you handle residents who need modified food textures, and how do you make those meals appetizing?"
"Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
"What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
"Can you show me how medications are stored and secured on the units, including controlled drugs?"
"What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
"Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

Facility	Distance	City	Overall	Inspection	Flags
Walnut Creek Skilled Nursing & Rehabilitation Cent	0.1 mi	Walnut Creek, CA	★★☆☆☆	2/5
Rossmoor Post Acute	0.1 mi	Walnut Creek, CA	★★★★★	4/5
Tampico Healthcare Center	2.6 mi	Walnut Creek, CA	★★★★☆	3/5
La Casa via Transitional Care Center	2.7 mi	Walnut Creek, CA	★★★★★	4/5
Moraga Post Acute	3.4 mi	Moraga, CA	★★★★★	4/5
Pleasant Hill Post Acute	3.9 mi	Pleasant Hill, CA	★★★★☆	3/5
Rosewood Post Acute	3.9 mi	Pleasant Hill, CA	★★★★☆	4/5
Shadelands Post Acute	4.6 mi	Walnut Creek, CA	★★★★☆	3/5
Danville Post-Acute Rehab	5.3 mi	Danville, CA	★★★★☆	3/5
Orinda Care Center, LLC	5.6 mi	Orinda, CA	★★☆☆☆	2/5
Concord Post Acute	6.0 mi	Concord, CA	★★☆☆☆	2/5	abuse
Bayberry Skilled Nursing & Healthcare Center	7.1 mi	Concord, CA	★★★★☆	3/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Walnut Creek →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 555710.

The Care File

Visit checklist — Tice Valley Post Acute

1975 Tice Valley Blvd., Walnut Creek, CA 94595 · 9259060200

Health inspection rating 4/5 · CMS overall 5/5· Fines (3y): $0

Questions for the administrator:

☐ "Can you tell me about this citation and confirm your license and compliance status today?"
☐ "How does your pharmacist review residents' medications, and how quickly can you fill new or urgent prescriptions?"
☐ "How many aides are on each shift, and how do you make sure every resident gets timely help with bathing, dressing, and meals?"
☐ "How do you coordinate and monitor care for residents who receive dialysis?"
☐ "How do you handle residents who need modified food textures, and how do you make those meals appetizing?"
☐ "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
☐ "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
☐ "Can you show me how medications are stored and secured on the units, including controlled drugs?"
☐ "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
☐ "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"

While you're there, notice:

☐ Smell and cleanliness in hallways, not just the lobby
☐ How staff speak to residents; call lights answered promptly
☐ Residents up, dressed, and engaged (visit mealtimes and a weekend if you can)

Data: CMS Provider Data Catalog, version 2026-08-01 · CCN 555710 · Verify at medicare.gov/care-compare · Printed from The Care File (thecarefile.com)