304 Fifth Avenue, Decatur, GA 30030 (opens Google Maps) · De Kalb County · (404) 373-6231· 103 certified beds · avg 94 residents/day · certified since Sep 1, 1989 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: JOURNEY HEALTHCARE (32 facilities, chain avg rating 1.9★)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
▲ Immediate jeopardy, isolated · Oct 4, 2023 · F-0656
The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Why it matters: Without a complete, working care plan, important needs can slip through the cracks and no one is accountable for results.
Severity (J): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Nov 28, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Immediate jeopardy, isolated · Oct 4, 2023 · F-0695
The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Why it matters: Mistakes in breathing care can quickly become life-threatening for residents who depend on oxygen or equipment.
Severity (J): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Nov 28, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Immediate jeopardy, isolated · Oct 4, 2023 · F-0835
The facility was not managed in a way that uses its money, staff, and resources effectively and efficiently to care for residents.
Why it matters: Poor administration often shows up as understaffing, supply shortages, and care problems across the whole facility.
Severity (J): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Nov 28, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
Showing the latest 3 of 29 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint F-0880
The facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. F-0558
The facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need. F-0644
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 14, 2026 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint · F-0880 |
| Jan 14, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. · F-0558 |
| Jan 14, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need. · F-0644 |
| Jan 14, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677 |
| Jan 14, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Aug 20, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint · F-0656 |
| Aug 20, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes. · from a complaint · F-0693 |
| Aug 20, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint · F-0880 |
| Mar 7, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not maintain an effective pest control program to prevent or deal with mice, insects, or other pests. · from a complaint · F-0925 |
| Jan 9, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. · from a complaint · F-0558 |
| Jan 9, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not honor residents' right to make their own choices about their daily lives, such as when to wake up, what to eat, or how to spend their time. · from a complaint · F-0561 |
| Jan 9, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · from a complaint · F-0641 |
| Jan 9, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · from a complaint · F-0657 |
| Jan 9, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint · F-0677 |
| Jan 9, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline. · from a complaint · F-0688 |
| Jan 9, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · from a complaint · F-0761 |
| Jan 9, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint · F-0842 |
| Jan 9, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint · F-0880 |
| Oct 4, 2023 | ▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Oct 4, 2023 | ▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Oct 4, 2023 | ▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, isolated | The facility was not managed in a way that uses its money, staff, and resources effectively and efficiently to care for residents. · F-0835 |
| Oct 4, 2023 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection. · F-0607 |
| Oct 4, 2023 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Oct 4, 2023 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Oct 4, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · F-0584 |
| Oct 4, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate. · F-0554 |
| Oct 4, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · F-0690 |
| Oct 4, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. · F-0758 |
| Oct 4, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. · F-0760 |
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (9 → 5).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 11 | 3 | J ▲ |
| 2025 | 13 | 0 | E |
| 2026 | 5 | 0 | F |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
3 fines totaling $53,565.
Every penalty CMS publishes for this facility in the 3-year window is listed —none excluded. The count and the dollar total come from two different CMS datasets and agree for this facility. Penalties older than the window are dropped by CMS before publication, not by us.
| Date | Type | Amount / length |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 20, 2024 | Fine | $3,798 |
| Jan 30, 2024 | Fine | $9,116 |
| Oct 4, 2023 | Fine | $40,651 |
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Georgia avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 2.16 | 3.54 | 3.95 | bottom 1% in Georgia; bottom 1% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.24 | 0.50 | 0.69 | bottom 10% in Georgia; bottom 4% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 1.97 | 3.09 | 3.50 | bottom 2% in Georgia; bottom 2% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.31 | 0.35 | 0.48 | top 45% in Georgia; bottom 35% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 18.0 | 46.0 | 45.8 | top 1% in Georgia; top 2% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 20.0 | 44.5 | 42.9 | top 11% in Georgia; top 13% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.07, RN 0.34, weekend 2.80.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.07 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 2/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 2/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Crossings at East Lake of Journey LLC, the. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 Bees Holdings LLC | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2024 |
| Ajoj Holdings LLC | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2024 |
| Bees Family Irrevocable Trust | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2024 |
| Blue Ocean Trust | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2024 |
| Journey Ox Ga Healthcare Holdings LLC | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2024 |
| Journey Ox of Ga LLC | Organization | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2024 |
| McGuinness, Bernard | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2024 |
| Shasam Family Trust | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2024 |
| Shasam Holdings LLC | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2024 |
| Baker, D'nae | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2024 |
| Baker, D'nae | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2024 |
| Bilbo, Richard | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/20/2024 |
| Bilbo, Richard | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/20/2024 |
| Conrad, Cameron | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2024 |
| Conrad, Cameron | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2024 |
| Forbes, Gregory | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2024 |
| Forbes, Gregory | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2024 |
| Frinks, Terence | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2024 |
| Frinks, Terence | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2024 |
| Gafford, Dexter | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2024 |
Showing 20 of 41 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 21 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
CMS lists this facility under the chain Journey Healthcare — 32 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 31 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pruitthealth - Virginia Park | 3.0 mi | Atlanta, GA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Decatur Center for Nursing and Healing LLC | 3.0 mi | Decatur, GA | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Harborview Decatur | 3.1 mi | Decatur, GA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Glenwood Health Center by Harborview | 3.3 mi | Decatur, GA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Parkside at Budd Terrace Operating Company LLC | 3.7 mi | Atlanta, GA | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Westminster Commons | 4.0 mi | Atlanta, GA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| A.g. Rhodes Home, INC, the | 4.3 mi | Atlanta, GA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Legacy Transitional Care & Rehabilitation | 4.3 mi | Atlanta, GA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Pruitthealth - Decatur | 4.5 mi | Decatur, GA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| A.g. Rhodes Home Wesley Woods | 5.0 mi | Atlanta, GA | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Georgia Regional Atlanta LTC | 5.5 mi | Decatur, GA | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Terraces at Peachtree Hills Place, the | 6.2 mi | Atlanta, GA | ★★★★★ | 4/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in De Kalb, GA — 18 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 115482.
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details