814 Jackson St., Stoughton, WI 53589 (opens Google Maps) · Dane County · (608) 873-6448· 99 certified beds · avg 61 residents/day · certified since Jan 1, 2005 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: COMPLETE CARE (85 facilities, chain avg rating 3.1★)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
▲ Immediate jeopardy, isolated · Jun 10, 2026 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (J): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: May 13, 2026 (Past Non-Compliance)
▲ Immediate jeopardy, isolated · Sep 30, 2024 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (J): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Nov 11, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
Showing the latest 3 of 27 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint F-0689
The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · from a complaint F-0658
The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · from a complaint F-0657
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 10, 2026 | ▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Jun 10, 2026 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · from a complaint · F-0658 |
| Jun 10, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · from a complaint · F-0657 |
| Apr 2, 2026 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not serve meals and snacks at times that fit residents' needs, preferences, and requests, or did not offer nourishing alternatives for residents who want to eat outside scheduled meal times. · F-0809 |
| Apr 2, 2026 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Apr 2, 2026 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not dispose of garbage and refuse properly. · F-0814 |
| Apr 2, 2026 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Apr 2, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician. · F-0803 |
| Apr 2, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature. · F-0804 |
| Apr 2, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Apr 2, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. · F-0760 |
| Apr 2, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Apr 2, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the social services residents need — such as counseling, help with adjustment, or connecting to outside resources — to achieve the best possible quality of life. · from a complaint · F-0745 |
| Jan 9, 2025 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature. · F-0804 |
| Jan 9, 2025 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Jan 9, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · from a complaint · F-0686 |
| Jan 9, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Jan 9, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · F-0755 |
| Jan 9, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint · F-0880 |
| Sep 30, 2024 | ▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Nov 30, 2023 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Nov 30, 2023 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Nov 30, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature. · F-0804 |
| Nov 30, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate. · F-0554 |
| Nov 30, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Nov 30, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. · F-0759 |
| Nov 30, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations. · F-0883 |
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (6 → 9).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 7 | 0 | F |
| 2024 | 1 | 1 | J ▲ |
| 2025 | 7 | 0 | F |
| 2026 | 12 | 1 | J ▲ |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
1 fine totaling $15,642, plus 1 Medicare payment denial period.
Every penalty CMS publishes for this facility in the 3-year window is listed —none excluded. The count and the dollar total come from two different CMS datasets and agree for this facility. Penalties older than the window are dropped by CMS before publication, not by us.
| Date | Type | Amount / length |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 30, 2024 | Fine | $15,642 |
| Sep 30, 2024 | Payment Denial | 20 days from Oct 22, 2024 |
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Wisconsin avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 4.57 | 4.29 | 3.95 | top 33% in Wisconsin; top 21% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.81 | 1.01 | 0.69 | bottom 35% in Wisconsin; top 26% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 4.24 | 3.84 | 3.50 | top 30% in Wisconsin; top 17% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.65 | 0.68 | 0.48 | top 47% in Wisconsin; top 19% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 61.6 | 46.9 | 45.8 | bottom 18% in Wisconsin; bottom 14% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 60.0 | 39.7 | 42.9 | bottom 20% in Wisconsin; bottom 22% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 5.20, RN 0.93, weekend 4.83.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (5.20 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 4/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 3/5 · short-stay residents: 2/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Complete Care at Nazareth LLC. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eef Capital LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 40% | 06/01/2018 |
| Schlaff, Benny | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 20% | 06/01/2018 |
| Schlaff, Nachum | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 20% | 06/01/2018 |
| Silverberg, Nisanel | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 11% | 06/01/2018 |
| SNJ Wisconsin LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 60% | 06/01/2018 |
| Culp, Karen | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/03/2020 |
| Culp, Karen | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/03/2020 |
| Eef Capital LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2018 |
| Hellman, Yosef | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2018 |
| Hellman, Yosef | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2018 |
| Hellman, Yosef | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2018 |
| Nazareth Property LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/31/2025 |
| Schlaff, Benny | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2018 |
| Schlaff, Nachum | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2018 |
| Schmidt, Lonna | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/31/2025 |
| Sidhu, Sarfraz | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2024 |
| Sidhu, Sarfraz | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2024 |
| Silverberg, Nisanel | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2018 |
| SNJ Wisconsin LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2018 |
| Stein, Shalom | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2018 |
Showing 20 of 23 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 3 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
CMS lists this facility under the chain Complete Care — 85 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 84 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Skaalen Nursing and Rehabilitation Center | 1.1 mi | Stoughton, WI | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Edgerton Care Center, INC | 9.6 mi | Edgerton, WI | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Evansville Manor Nursing and Rehab, LLC | 10.4 mi | Evansville, WI | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuseSFF |
| Oak Park Nursing and Rehab Center | 11.8 mi | Madison, WI | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Madison Health and Rehabilitation Center | 12.8 mi | Madison, WI | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Capitol Lakes Health Center | 13.1 mi | Madison, WI | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Oak Park Place of Nakoma | 13.8 mi | Madison, WI | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Complete Care at Maple Grove LLC | 15.0 mi | Madison, WI | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Hebron Oaks | 15.6 mi | Madison, WI | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Badger Prairie HCC | 15.7 mi | Verona, WI | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Four Winds Manor | 15.9 mi | Verona, WI | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Oakwood Village East Health and Rehab Center | 16.6 mi | Madison, WI | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Dane, WI — 16 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 525681.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details