How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
1101 Hazel Lane, Farmington, MO 63640 (opens Google Maps) · St. Francois County · (573) 756-6658· 104 certified beds · avg 95 residents/day · certified since Sep 6, 1989 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: AMERICARE SENIOR LIVING (23 facilities, chain avg rating 3.6★)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★★5/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Showing the latest 3 of 17 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. F-0550
The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. F-0695
The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. F-0880
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 10, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · F-0550 |
| Apr 10, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Apr 10, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Nov 22, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection. · F-0607 |
| Nov 22, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not reassess a resident after a significant change in their condition, such as a sudden decline in health. A full new assessment is required when a resident's condition changes in a major way. · F-0637 |
| Nov 22, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| Nov 22, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · F-0658 |
| Nov 22, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | When a resident had a planned discharge, the facility did not make sure the necessary information was communicated to the resident and to the doctors or facility taking over their care. · F-0661 |
| Nov 22, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Nov 22, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility's quality committee — the internal group responsible for finding and fixing care problems — did not have the required members or did not meet at least every three months. · F-0868 |
| Nov 22, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Nov 22, 2024 | C · Potential for minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not properly hold, secure, and manage residents' personal money that was deposited with it for safekeeping. Facilities holding residents' funds must keep careful, honest accounts. · F-0568 |
| Nov 22, 2024 | C · Potential for minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not properly protect the personal money residents deposited with it for safekeeping. · F-0570 |
| Nov 3, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail. · F-0698 |
| Nov 3, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Nov 3, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · F-0658 |
| Nov 3, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (10 → 3).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 4 | 0 | E |
| 2024 | 10 | 0 | D |
| 2026 | 3 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Missouri avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.45 | 3.66 | 3.95 | bottom 43% in Missouri; bottom 34% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.43 | 0.49 | 0.69 | top 47% in Missouri; bottom 27% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.09 | 3.22 | 3.50 | bottom 47% in Missouri; bottom 36% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.46 | 0.33 | 0.48 | top 12% in Missouri; top 38% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 45.4 | 56.0 | 45.8 | top 24% in Missouri; bottom 49% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 27.3 | 47.8 | 42.9 | top 21% in Missouri; top 24% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.66, RN 0.45, weekend 3.28.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.66 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 2/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 2/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Southbrook Nursing Center. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ford, Julianna | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 12/05/2022 |
| Grand Plains Skilled Nursing LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 12/05/2022 |
| HWJ LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 12/05/2022 |
| Montgomery, Henley | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 12/05/2022 |
| Montgomery, William | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 12/05/2022 |
| Americare Systems, INC. | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/05/2022 |
| Grand Plains Skilled Nursing LLC | Organization | Limited Partnership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/05/2022 |
| Hammond, Robert | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/05/2022 |
| Schade, Kyle | Individual | Contracted Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/05/2022 |
| Schade, Kyle | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/05/2022 |
All 10 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
CMS lists this facility under the chain Americare Senior Living — 23 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 22 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Farmington Presbyterian Manor | 0.7 mi | Farmington, MO | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Community Manor | 0.8 mi | Farmington, MO | ★★★☆☆ | 4/5 | |
| Camelot Nursing and Rehabilitation Center | 0.8 mi | Farmington, MO | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| St Francois Manor | 2.6 mi | Farmington, MO | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Country Meadows | 6.5 mi | Park Hills, MO | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| NHC Healthcare, Desloge | 7.3 mi | Desloge, MO | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| St Joe Manor | 11.1 mi | Bonne Terre, MO | ★☆☆☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Baptist Homes of Arcadia Valley | 16.5 mi | Ironton, MO | —/5 | ||
| Madison Medical Center | 17.2 mi | Fredericktown, MO | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Claru Deville Nursing Center | 17.5 mi | Fredericktown, MO | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Belleview Valley Nursing Home | 18.6 mi | Belleview, MO | —/5 | SFF |
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 265389.
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details