How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Camelot Nursing and Rehabilitation Center
705 Grand Canyon Drive, Farmington, MO 63640 (opens Google Maps) · St. Francois County · (573) 756-8911· 97 certified beds · avg 70 residents/day · certified since Jan 1, 1989 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: MGM HEALTHCARE (27 facilities, chain avg rating 2.3★)
5/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Feb 25, 2026
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.58
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★★5/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 12 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not make sure residents were fully informed about their own health, care, and treatments in a way they could understand. F-0552
The facility charged residents' personal funds for items or services that Medicare or Medicaid already pays for. Facilities may not bill residents for covered items. F-0571
The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. F-0641
View all 12 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 25, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not make sure residents were fully informed about their own health, care, and treatments in a way they could understand. · F-0552 |
| Feb 25, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility charged residents' personal funds for items or services that Medicare or Medicaid already pays for. Facilities may not bill residents for covered items. · F-0571 |
| Feb 25, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| Feb 25, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · F-0658 |
| Feb 25, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Oct 25, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. · F-0759 |
| Oct 25, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Oct 20, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not fully assess residents on time — a complete assessment of health, abilities, and needs is required when a resident is first admitted and at least once every 12 months after that. · F-0636 |
| Oct 20, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not update each resident's care assessment at least once every 3 months. These regular check-ins keep the resident's care plan matched to their current condition. · F-0638 |
| Oct 20, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| Oct 20, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility used bed rails without first trying safer alternatives, or without assessing the resident's safety risk, discussing the risks and benefits with the resident or family, getting consent, and installing the rails correctly. · F-0700 |
| Oct 20, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not regularly inspect bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails for safety, or the rails and mattresses were not attached safely to the frames. · F-0909 |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (2 → 5).
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2023
All citations: 5
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2024
All citations: 2
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2026
All citations: 5
Serious citations (G–L): 0
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 5 | 0 | D |
| 2024 | 2 | 0 | D |
| 2026 | 5 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
What these staffing numbers mean →
This facilityMissouri averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 3.58
Missouri average: 3.66
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 0.52
Missouri average: 0.49
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 3.04
Missouri average: 3.22
U.S. average: 3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Missouri avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.58 | 3.66 | 3.95 | top 50% in Missouri; bottom 41% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.52 | 0.49 | 0.69 | top 34% in Missouri; bottom 41% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.04 | 3.22 | 3.50 | bottom 44% in Missouri; bottom 33% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.33 | 0.33 | 0.48 | top 35% in Missouri; bottom 38% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 66.3 | 56.0 | 45.8 | bottom 23% in Missouri; bottom 9% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 54.5 | 47.8 | 42.9 | bottom 42% in Missouri; bottom 29% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.12, RN 0.60, weekend 3.49.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (4.12 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 2/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5
Costs & payment
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Camelot Nursing and Rehabilitation Center. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
- Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
- Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
- Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
Who owns this facility
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Camelot SNF Investments, LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 50% | 10/18/2021 |
| Bienstock, Judah | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/18/2021 |
| Cissell, Krista | Individual | W-2 Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/18/2021 |
All 3 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
Other facilities in the same chain
CMS lists this facility under the chain MGM Healthcare — 27 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
- Florissant Valley Health & Rehabilitation Center — Florissant, MO · overall 1/5
- Jackson Manor — Jackson, MO · overall 4/5
- Lansdowne Village — Saint Louis, MO · overall 1/5
- Normandy Nursing Center — Saint Louis, MO · overall 1/5abuse
- Oak Park Care Center — Saint Louis, MO · overall 3/5
- Quarters at Des Peres, the — Des Peres, MO · overall 1/5
- Sherbrooke Village — Saint Louis, MO · overall 2/5
- Spring Valley Health & Rehabilitation Center — Springfield, MO · overall 2/5
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 26 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "How do you explain health changes and treatment options to residents and their families?"
- "Can you give me a written list of exactly what residents are charged for beyond what Medicare or Medicaid covers?"
- "Who completes resident assessments here, and how do you check them for accuracy?"
- "Can you tell me what this citation involved and what steps you took to bring care back up to standard?"
- "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
- "What is your current medication error rate, and what have you changed to bring errors down?"
- "Can you show me how medications are stored and secured on the units, including controlled drugs?"
- "How soon after admission is a full assessment completed, and how are the findings shared with the family?"
Also worth asking anywhere
- "Your weekend nurse staffing is reported below the Missouri midpoint — how does the weekend schedule differ from a weekday?"
- "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
- "CMS reports 66% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
- "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"
Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Community Manor | 0.3 mi | Farmington, MO | ★★★☆☆ | 4/5 | |
| Southbrook Nursing Center | 0.8 mi | Farmington, MO | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Farmington Presbyterian Manor | 0.8 mi | Farmington, MO | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| St Francois Manor | 2.4 mi | Farmington, MO | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Country Meadows | 6.2 mi | Park Hills, MO | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| NHC Healthcare, Desloge | 7.2 mi | Desloge, MO | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| St Joe Manor | 10.9 mi | Bonne Terre, MO | ★☆☆☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Baptist Homes of Arcadia Valley | 17.4 mi | Ironton, MO | —/5 | ||
| Madison Medical Center | 17.6 mi | Fredericktown, MO | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Claru Deville Nursing Center | 17.8 mi | Fredericktown, MO | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Belleview Valley Nursing Home | 19.3 mi | Belleview, MO | —/5 | SFF | |
| Baisch Nursing Center | 20.0 mi | De Soto, MO | ★★☆☆☆ | 3/5 |
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 265348.