Texas ›Corpus Christi

Cimarron Place Health & Rehabilitation

Costs & paymentPlan a visit

3801 Cimarron Blvd, Corpus Christi, TX 78414 (opens Google Maps) · Nueces County · (361) 993-8500· 120 certified beds · avg 81 residents/day · certified since Feb 1, 2006 · Medicare and Medicaid certified

Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →

Part of chain: HMG HEALTHCARE (31 facilities, chain avg rating 3.1★)

4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Jun 26, 2025
1
Serious findings on record
most recent Jul 20, 2025
$19,143
Fines, last 3 years
3.22
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

New to these records? How to read an inspection report →

Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5 · how star ratings work →

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, isolated · Jul 20, 2025 · F-0697 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it.

Why it matters: Untreated pain causes needless suffering and can lead to depression, poor sleep, and declining health.

Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.

Corrected: Jul 22, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

Inspection findings in the public record

Showing the latest 3 of 19 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.

  1. D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated

    The facility did not provide required paperwork or notices about a resident's needs, their right to appeal a transfer or discharge, or the facility's bed-hold policy (how long a bed is saved during a hospital stay). · from a complaint F-0628

  2. D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated

    The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint F-0755

  3. D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated

    The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · from a complaint F-0761

View all 19 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Jun 3, 2026D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not provide required paperwork or notices about a resident's needs, their right to appeal a transfer or discharge, or the facility's bed-hold policy (how long a bed is saved during a hospital stay). · from a complaint · F-0628
May 6, 2026D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint · F-0755
Feb 6, 2026D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · from a complaint · F-0761
Nov 24, 2025D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not protect residents from misuse of their belongings or money — this is called misappropriation, and it includes theft or improper use of a resident's property or funds. · from a complaint · F-0602
Jul 20, 2025▲ G · Actual harm, isolatedThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it. · from a complaint · F-0697
Jun 26, 2025E · Potential for more than minimal harm, patternThe facility did not safely and appropriately administer IV fluids (fluids given through a vein) for residents who needed them. · F-0694
Jun 26, 2025D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689
Jun 26, 2025D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. · F-0760
Jun 26, 2025D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761
May 14, 2025D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint · F-0656
Mar 13, 2025D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint · F-0656
Mar 13, 2025D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint · F-0842
May 2, 2024D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · F-0755
May 2, 2024D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761
May 2, 2024D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812
May 2, 2024D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880
May 2, 2024B · Potential for minimal harm, patternThe facility did not dispose of garbage and refuse properly. · F-0814
Mar 9, 2023E · Potential for more than minimal harm, patternThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812
Mar 9, 2023D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (5 → 4).

Citations by recorded inspection yearPublished citation counts, not a quality score · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2023
All citations: 2
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2024
All citations: 5
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2025
All citations: 9
Serious citations (G–L): 1
2026
All citations: 3
Serious citations (G–L): 0

All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202320E
202450D
202591G ▲
202630D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

How to file a complaint about care →

2 fines totaling $19,143.

Every penalty CMS publishes for this facility in the 3-year window is listed —none excluded. The count and the dollar total come from two different CMS datasets and agree for this facility. Penalties older than the window are dropped by CMS before publication, not by us.

DateTypeAmount / length
Jun 24, 2025Fine$9,110
Jun 27, 2024Fine$10,033

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

What these staffing numbers mean →

Nurse time, in contextAdjusted hours per resident per day · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01
This facilityTexas averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 3.22
Texas average: 3.46
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 0.40
Texas average: 0.44
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 2.82
Texas average: 3.04
U.S. average: 3.50

All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.

MeasureThis facilityTexas avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.223.463.95bottom 41% in Texas; bottom 22% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.400.440.69top 48% in Texas; bottom 21% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing2.823.043.50bottom 40% in Texas; bottom 22% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.460.340.48top 18% in Texas; top 39% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)65.655.345.8bottom 24% in Texas; bottom 9% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)60.054.642.9bottom 42% in Texas; bottom 22% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.19, RN 0.39, weekend 2.79.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.19 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 1/5.

Quality measures: assessments & claims

Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.

Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5

Costs & payment

Price evidence · separate from quality

No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Cimarron Place Health & Rehabilitation. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.

Calculate a stay from a quote you receive

Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.

Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.

Before you compare prices

  • Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
  • Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
  • Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.

Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price

Who owns this facility

How to read ownership records →

Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Balsamo, KrystalIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2021
Balsamo, KrystalIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2021
Cascade Nueces Health Services LTDOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2021
Cibc Bank USAOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2021
Cibc Bank USAOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2021
Culp, RolandIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2021
Culp, RolandIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2021
Daspit, LaurenceIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2021
Daspit, LaurenceIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2021
Dayton, StevenIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2022
Dohn, WilliamIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2021
Dohn, WilliamIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2021
Forvis Mazars LLPOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2021
Guerrero, IsaacIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2022
HMG Services LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2021
Murrell, EdwardIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2012
Murrell, EdwardIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2018
Pico, AnaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2021
Pico, AnaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2021
Ponce, KimberlyIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE03/20/2020

Showing 20 of 41 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 21 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.

Other facilities in the same chain

CMS lists this facility under the chain HMG Healthcare — 31 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.

Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 30 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.

Questions to ask on your visit

Full visit checklist →

Print visit checklist

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

  • "How do you assess and manage residents' pain, especially for those who have trouble communicating?"
  • "What written notices do we get before any transfer or discharge, and what is your bed-hold policy?"
  • "How does your pharmacist review residents' medications, and how quickly can you fill new or urgent prescriptions?"
  • "Can you show me how medications are stored and secured on the units, including controlled drugs?"
  • "What safeguards do you have to protect residents' money and belongings, and what happens when something goes missing?"
  • "Who on your staff manages IV therapy, and what training and monitoring is in place?"
  • "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
  • "What systems do you use to prevent medication errors, and what happens when one occurs?"

Also worth asking anywhere

  • "Your weekend nurse staffing is reported below the Texas midpoint — how does the weekend schedule differ from a weekday?"
  • "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
  • "CMS reports 66% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
  • "The ownership record on file lists 41 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
  • "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Mirador0.8 miCorpus Christi, TX★★★★☆4/5
Corpus Christi Nursing and Rehabilitation Center1.3 miCorpus Christi, TX★★☆☆☆3/5
Wooldridge Place Nursing Center1.8 miCorpus Christi, TX★★☆☆☆2/5
The Palms Nursing & Rehabilitation2.9 miCorpus Christi, TX★☆☆☆☆2/5abuse
San Rafael Nursing and Rehabilitation Center5.3 miCorpus Christi, TX★☆☆☆☆1/5
Windsor Nursing and Rehabilitation Center of Corpu7.1 miCorpus Christi, TX★★★★☆4/5
Windsor Nursing and Rehabilitation Center of Morga8.1 miCorpus Christi, TX★★☆☆☆2/5abuse
Alameda Oaks Nursing Center8.1 miCorpus Christi, TX★★★☆☆3/5
Avir at Corpus Christi8.3 miCorpus Christi, TX★★★★☆3/5
Brookdale Trinity Towers8.8 miCorpus Christi, TX★★★★★4/5
Avir at Portland16.1 miPortland, TX★☆☆☆☆2/5
Robstown Nursing and Rehabilitation Center19.5 miRobstown, TX★★☆☆☆2/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

Other facilities in the same county

CMS records place this facility in Nueces, TX — 14 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.

Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.

All facilities in Corpus Christi →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 676087.

Your research

Viewed & saved homes

Kept in this browser tab for this session. Choose to remember them only on a device you trust. Opening a record or comparison sends its usual page request.

Selected for comparison

Recently viewed

Prices entered in a cost worksheet stay on that page and are not saved. Privacy details