How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Chalet Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center
4851 Tincher Rd, Indianapolis, IN 46221 (opens Google Maps) · Marion County · (317) 856-4851· 88 certified beds · avg 67 residents/day · certified since Jul 10, 1989 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: CASTLE HEALTHCARE (7 facilities, chain avg rating 3.0★)
2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Jun 5, 2026
1
Serious findings on record
most recent Feb 16, 2026
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.32
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Feb 16, 2026 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Feb 16, 2026 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 15 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. F-0812
The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. F-0880
The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint F-0600
View all 15 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 5, 2026 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Jun 5, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Mar 5, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint · F-0600 |
| Mar 5, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint · F-0609 |
| Feb 16, 2026 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Feb 16, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes. · from a complaint · F-0693 |
| Jan 7, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint · F-0656 |
| Jan 7, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not safely and appropriately administer IV fluids (fluids given through a vein) for residents who needed them. · from a complaint · F-0694 |
| Jan 7, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint · F-0842 |
| Apr 3, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. · F-0558 |
| Apr 3, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| Apr 3, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Apr 3, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657 |
| Jan 4, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint · F-0609 |
| Sep 13, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · from a complaint · F-0812 |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (4 → 2).
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2023
All citations: 1
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2024
All citations: 1
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2025
All citations: 4
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2026
All citations: 9
Serious citations (G–L): 1
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 1 | 0 | E |
| 2024 | 1 | 0 | D |
| 2025 | 4 | 0 | D |
| 2026 | 9 | 1 | G ▲ |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
What these staffing numbers mean →
This facilityIndiana averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 3.32
Indiana average: 3.42
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 0.53
Indiana average: 0.62
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 2.89
Indiana average: 3.01
U.S. average: 3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Indiana avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.32 | 3.42 | 3.95 | top 47% in Indiana; bottom 27% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.53 | 0.62 | 0.69 | bottom 46% in Indiana; bottom 43% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 2.89 | 3.01 | 3.50 | top 47% in Indiana; bottom 25% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.34 | 0.47 | 0.48 | bottom 33% in Indiana; bottom 40% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 61.8 | 45.9 | 45.8 | bottom 10% in Indiana; bottom 14% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 50.0 | 40.4 | 42.9 | bottom 35% in Indiana; bottom 39% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.55, RN 0.57, weekend 3.10.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.55 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 2/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 2/5
Costs & payment
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Chalet Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
- Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
- Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
- Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
Who owns this facility
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adams County Memorial Hospital | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2013 |
| Andres, Anthony | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2025 |
| Andres, Anthony | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2023 |
| Berdugo, Shai | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2023 |
| Berdugo, Shai | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2023 |
| Blue Management Services LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2024 |
| Borne-Bauman, Candice | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2019 |
| Borne-Bauman, Candice | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2019 |
| Castle Indiana Management LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2023 |
| Clayshire LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2023 |
| Clayshire LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2023 |
| Davis, Nesanel | Individual | Individual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/29/2026 |
| Decatur Real Propco LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Mortgage Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2021 |
| Decatur Real Propco LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2021 |
| Decatur Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2021 |
| Decatur Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2021 |
| First Bank of Berne | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2020 |
| Flueckiger, Russell | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2015 |
| Flueckiger, Russell | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2015 |
| Forvis Mazars LLP | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2025 |
Showing 20 of 37 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 17 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
Other facilities in the same chain
CMS lists this facility under the chain Castle Healthcare — 7 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
- Chateau Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center — Fort Wayne, IN · overall 1/5
- Clinton House Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center — Frankfort, IN · overall 5/5
- McCormick's Creek Rehabilitation and Healthcare — Spencer, IN · overall 4/5
- Owen Valley Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center — Spencer, IN · overall 4/5
- Waldron Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center — Waldron, IN · overall 3/5
- Beaumont Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center — Anderson, IN · overall 2/5
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking.
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
- "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
- "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
- "Tell me about this abuse or neglect citation — what happened, and what specific changes did you make afterward?"
- "When abuse or theft is suspected, who do you notify, how fast, and how do you inform the family?"
- "How do you decide when a feeding tube is truly needed, and how do staff care for residents who have one?"
- "Can you show me an example care plan, and how are families included when it's created and updated?"
- "Who on your staff manages IV therapy, and what training and monitoring is in place?"
Also worth asking anywhere
- "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
- "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
- "CMS reports 62% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
- "The ownership record on file lists 37 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
- "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"
Nearby facilities (12 closest of 74 within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Washington Healthcare Center | 4.0 mi | Indianapolis, IN | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Envive of Indianapolis | 5.1 mi | Indianapolis, IN | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Forest Creek Village | 5.7 mi | Indianapolis, IN | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Plainfield Health Care Center | 6.3 mi | Plainfield, IN | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | SFF |
| Bethany Village | 6.3 mi | Indianapolis, IN | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Greenwood Meadows | 6.6 mi | Greenwood, IN | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Westside Retirement Village | 6.7 mi | Indianapolis, IN | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Westpark a Waters Community | 6.7 mi | Indianapolis, IN | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Cumberland Trace Health & Living Community | 6.8 mi | Plainfield, IN | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Majestic Care of Southport | 6.9 mi | Indianapolis, IN | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Meadow Lakes | 7.2 mi | Mooresville, IN | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Waters of Indianapolis, the | 7.3 mi | Indianapolis, IN | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Other facilities in the same county
CMS records place this facility in Marion, IN — 46 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
- Clearvista Lake Health Campus — Indianapolis, IN · overall 4/5
- Community Nursing and Rehabilitation Center — Indianapolis, IN · overall 2/5
- Creekside Health and Rehabilitation Center — Indianapolis, IN · overall 3/5
- Eagle Valley Meadows — Indianapolis, IN · overall 2/5
- Envive of Beech Grove — Beech Grove, IN · overall 3/5
- Evergreen Crossing and the Lofts — Indianapolis, IN · overall 2/5
- Fairway Village — Indianapolis, IN · overall 5/5
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 155336.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).