How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Clearvista Lake Health Campus
8405 Clearvista Place, Indianapolis, IN 46256 (opens Google Maps) · Marion County · (317) 578-7500· 70 certified beds · avg 48 residents/day · certified since Feb 26, 2014 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: TRILOGY HEALTH SERVICES (123 facilities, chain avg rating 4.2★)
3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Jan 12, 2026
1
Serious findings on record
most recent Aug 22, 2023
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.12
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Aug 22, 2023 · F-0790
The facility did not provide routine dental care and 24-hour emergency dental care for residents.
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Aug 22, 2023 · F-0790
The facility did not provide routine dental care and 24-hour emergency dental care for residents.
Why it matters: Untreated dental problems cause pain, make eating difficult, and can lead to infections and weight loss.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Sep 22, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 27 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. F-0812
The facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate. F-0554
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. F-0689
View all 27 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 12, 2026 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Jan 12, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate. · F-0554 |
| Jan 12, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Jan 12, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it. · F-0697 |
| Nov 12, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| Nov 12, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it. · F-0697 |
| Nov 12, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Nov 12, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · F-0842 |
| Nov 12, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Nov 12, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors. · F-0921 |
| Jun 21, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint · F-0584 |
| Jun 21, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint · F-0684 |
| Jun 21, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint · F-0842 |
| Jun 21, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint · F-0880 |
| May 3, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint · F-0684 |
| Dec 12, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Aug 22, 2023 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not provide routine dental care and 24-hour emergency dental care for residents. · F-0790 |
| Aug 22, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| Aug 22, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Aug 22, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate. · F-0554 |
| Aug 22, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not honor residents' right to share a room with their spouse or a roommate of their choosing, or moved residents to a different room without written notice beforehand. · F-0559 |
| Aug 22, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| Aug 22, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | When a resident had a planned discharge, the facility did not make sure the necessary information was communicated to the resident and to the doctors or facility taking over their care. · F-0661 |
| Aug 22, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677 |
| Aug 22, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Aug 22, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail. · F-0698 |
| Aug 22, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (6 → 4).
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2023
All citations: 12
Serious citations (G–L): 1
2024
All citations: 11
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2026
All citations: 4
Serious citations (G–L): 0
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 12 | 1 | G ▲ |
| 2024 | 11 | 0 | D |
| 2026 | 4 | 0 | F |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
What these staffing numbers mean →
This facilityIndiana averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 3.12
Indiana average: 3.42
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 0.69
Indiana average: 0.62
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 2.54
Indiana average: 3.01
U.S. average: 3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Indiana avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.12 | 3.42 | 3.95 | bottom 36% in Indiana; bottom 18% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.69 | 0.62 | 0.69 | top 30% in Indiana; top 37% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 2.54 | 3.01 | 3.50 | bottom 21% in Indiana; bottom 11% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.56 | 0.47 | 0.48 | top 27% in Indiana; top 27% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 50.0 | 45.9 | 45.8 | bottom 37% in Indiana; bottom 38% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 58.3 | 40.4 | 42.9 | bottom 19% in Indiana; bottom 24% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.75, RN 0.83, weekend 3.05.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.75 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 2/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5
Costs & payment
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Clearvista Lake Health Campus. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
- Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
- Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
- Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
Who owns this facility
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
Government - County
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Witham Memorial Hospital | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 07/01/2015 |
| American Healthcare Reit Holdings LP | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2021 |
| American Healthcare Reit INC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2018 |
| Bardoczi, Stephen | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/03/2013 |
| Barney, Leigh | Individual | Individual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/19/2025 |
| Bayston, Brett | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2023 |
| Brand, John | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2015 |
| Braverman, Kelly | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2021 |
| Castetter, Andrea | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2023 |
| Davis, David | Individual | Individual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/19/2025 |
| Durham-Boring, Tammy | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/14/2025 |
| Gahc3 Trilogy JV LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2015 |
| Gahc4 Trilogy JV LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2018 |
| Hawkins, Claude | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/09/2013 |
| Hornbecker, Michael | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2024 |
| Mevzek, Stacy | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/18/2024 |
| Mevzek, Stacy | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/14/2025 |
| Ms Castleton, L.P. | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2015 |
| Paragon Outpatient Rehabilitation Services LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2015 |
| Reagan, Julie | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/25/2024 |
Showing 20 of 28 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 8 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
Other facilities in the same chain
CMS lists this facility under the chain Trilogy Health Services — 123 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
- Cobblestone Crossings Health Campus — Terre Haute, IN · overall 3/5
- Covered Bridge Health Campus — Seymour, IN · overall 5/5
- Creasy Springs Health Campus — Lafayette, IN · overall 3/5
- Cumberland Pointe Health Campus — West Lafayette, IN · overall 3/5
- Forest Park Health Campus — Richmond, IN · overall 3/5
- Glen Oaks Health Campus — New Castle, IN · overall 4/5
- Greenleaf Health Campus — Elkhart, IN · overall 3/5
- Hampton Oaks Health Campus — Scottsburg, IN · overall 5/5
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 122 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "How do residents get routine dental care, and what happens if someone has a dental emergency at night?"
- "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
- "If my family member is able to manage their own medications, would you allow it, and how is that decided?"
- "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
- "How do you assess and manage residents' pain, especially for those who have trouble communicating?"
- "How do you make sure each resident's care follows the doctor's orders, and what changed after this citation?"
- "Can you show me how medications are stored and secured on the units, including controlled drugs?"
- "How do you keep residents' medical records accurate, complete, and secure?"
Also worth asking anywhere
- "Your weekend nurse staffing is reported below the Indiana midpoint — how does the weekend schedule differ from a weekday?"
- "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
- "CMS reports 50% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
- "The ownership record on file lists 28 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
- "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"
Nearby facilities (12 closest of 73 within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Waters of Castleton Skilled Nursing Facility, the | 0.0 mi | Indianapolis, IN | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Castleton Health Care Center | 0.3 mi | Indianapolis, IN | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | SFF |
| Allisonville Meadows | 1.9 mi | Fishers, IN | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Allison Pointe Healthcare Center | 2.3 mi | Indianapolis, IN | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Hamilton Trace of Fishers | 4.0 mi | Fishers, IN | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Westminster Village North | 4.6 mi | Indianapolis, IN | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| McGivney Health Care Center | 4.9 mi | Carmel, IN | ★★☆☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Carmel Health & Living Community | 5.6 mi | Carmel, IN | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Restoracy of Carmel | 6.0 mi | Carmel, IN | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| American Village | 6.2 mi | Indianapolis, IN | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Creekside Health and Rehabilitation Center | 6.2 mi | Indianapolis, IN | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Prairie Lakes Health Campus | 6.3 mi | Noblesville, IN | ★★★★★ | 4/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Other facilities in the same county
CMS records place this facility in Marion, IN — 46 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
- Community Nursing and Rehabilitation Center — Indianapolis, IN · overall 2/5
- Eagle Valley Meadows — Indianapolis, IN · overall 2/5
- Envive of Beech Grove — Beech Grove, IN · overall 3/5
- Envive of Indianapolis — Indianapolis, IN · overall 1/5
- Evergreen Crossing and the Lofts — Indianapolis, IN · overall 2/5
- Fairway Village — Indianapolis, IN · overall 5/5
- Forest Creek Village — Indianapolis, IN · overall 4/5
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 155815.