600 East Cathedral Road, Philadelphia, PA 19128 (opens Google Maps) · Philadelphia County · (215) 487-1300· 82 certified beds · avg 67 residents/day · certified since Mar 28, 1980 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: PRESBYTERIAN SENIOR LIVING (11 facilities, chain avg rating 3.6★)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Jun 16, 2025 · F-0600 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.
Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Jul 4, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Sep 19, 2024 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Oct 25, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
Showing the latest 3 of 17 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint F-0689
The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. F-0610
The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint F-0656
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 25, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Feb 5, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · F-0610 |
| Jan 21, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint · F-0656 |
| Aug 12, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint · F-0677 |
| Jul 17, 2025 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Jul 17, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · F-0610 |
| Jul 17, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. · F-0759 |
| Jul 17, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. · F-0760 |
| Jun 16, 2025 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint · F-0600 |
| Feb 10, 2025 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Feb 10, 2025 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not dispose of garbage and refuse properly. · F-0814 |
| Feb 10, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · F-0550 |
| Feb 10, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · F-0600 |
| Feb 10, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Feb 10, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. · F-0759 |
| Feb 10, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Sep 19, 2024 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (4 → 1).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 1 | 1 | G ▲ |
| 2025 | 13 | 1 | G ▲ |
| 2026 | 3 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
2 fines totaling $208,039.
Every penalty CMS publishes for this facility in the 3-year window is listed —none excluded. The count and the dollar total come from two different CMS datasets and agree for this facility. Penalties older than the window are dropped by CMS before publication, not by us.
| Date | Type | Amount / length |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 19, 2024 | Fine | $32,526 |
| May 2, 2024 | Fine | $175,513 |
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Pennsylvania avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 4.27 | 3.94 | 3.95 | top 29% in Pennsylvania; top 30% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.61 | 0.80 | 0.69 | bottom 44% in Pennsylvania; top 46% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 4.02 | 3.58 | 3.50 | top 25% in Pennsylvania; top 22% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.43 | 0.56 | 0.48 | bottom 48% in Pennsylvania; top 44% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 54.1 | 44.5 | 45.8 | bottom 24% in Pennsylvania; bottom 27% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 64.3 | 39.9 | 42.9 | bottom 12% in Pennsylvania; bottom 16% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.00, RN 0.57, weekend 3.76.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (4.00 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 3/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Cathedral Village. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
Non profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cathedral Village | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | — | 01/01/2025 |
| Phi | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 06/01/2015 |
| Ab Staffing Solutions LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2025 |
| Adara Healthcare Staffing, INC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2025 |
| Amergis Healthcare Staffing, INC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2025 |
| Baker Tilly Advisory Group LP | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2025 |
| Benchmark Therapies, INC. | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2025 |
| Benevolent Healthcare Staffing LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2025 |
| Birdsall, James | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2023 |
| Bowser, Nicole | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/01/2011 |
| Burden, Ashley | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2025 |
| Burden, Ashley | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/21/2025 |
| Carr, Randi | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2021 |
| Chottiner, Lawrence | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2023 |
| Clancy, James | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2025 |
| Cross Country Staffing, INC. | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2025 |
| Curana Health of Pennsylvania PC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2025 |
| Davis, Danny | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2018 |
| Davis, Todd | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2024 |
| Dedicated Nursing Associates, INC. | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2025 |
Showing 20 of 58 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 38 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
CMS lists this facility under the chain Presbyterian Senior Living — 11 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 10 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meadowview Rehabilitation and Nursing Center | 1.0 mi | White Marsh, PA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Masonic Village at Lafayette Hill | 1.1 mi | Lafayette Hill, PA | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Waverly Heights | 2.2 mi | Gladwyne, PA | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Fairview Rehab and Care Center | 2.2 mi | Philadelphia, PA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Chestnut Hill Lodge Health and Rehab Ctr | 2.3 mi | Wyndmoor, PA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Wyndmoor Hills Rehabilitation and Nursing Center | 2.4 mi | Wyndmoor, PA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | SFF |
| Health Center at the Hill at Whitemarsh, the | 2.5 mi | Lafayette Hill, PA | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Saint Joseph Villa | 2.7 mi | Flourtown, PA | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Accela Rehab and Care Center at Springfield | 2.9 mi | Glenside, PA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Germantown Home | 2.9 mi | Philadelphia, PA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Liberty Center for Rehabilitation and Nursing | 3.1 mi | Philadelphia, PA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Cliveden Nursing and Rehabilitation Center | 3.3 mi | Philadelphia, PA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Philadelphia, PA — 46 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 395467.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details