North CarolinaFayetteville

Carolina Rehab Center of Cumberland

4600 Cumberland Road, Fayetteville, NC 28306 · Cumberland County · 136 certified beds · avg 131 residents/day · certified since Oct 26, 2000

Part of chain: LIFEWORKS REHAB (64 facilities, chain avg rating 2.1★)

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
7
Serious findings on record
$97,936
Fines, last 3 years
3.46
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Nov 4, 2024 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Aug 23, 2024 (Past Non-Compliance)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Mar 25, 2024 · F-0600 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.

Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Mar 16, 2024 (Past Non-Compliance)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Mar 5, 2025 · F-0684 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.

Why it matters: Care that strays from doctor's orders or ignores the resident's wishes can lead to declining health and avoidable harm.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Mar 13, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · May 3, 2024 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: May 24, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · May 3, 2024 · F-0700 · triggered by a complaint

The facility used bed rails without first trying safer alternatives, or without assessing the resident's safety risk, discussing the risks and benefits with the resident or family, getting consent, and installing the rails correctly.

Why it matters: Improperly used bed rails can trap or injure residents — in the worst cases, causing serious harm.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: May 24, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · May 3, 2024 · F-0867 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not run an ongoing quality assurance committee that reviews care problems and creates plans to fix them.

Why it matters: Without a working quality program, the same care problems tend to repeat instead of getting fixed.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: May 24, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Mar 25, 2024 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Mar 2, 2024 (Past Non-Compliance)

All citations in the current public record (25)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Jan 21, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. · from a complaint
Jul 2, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Mar 5, 2025▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Nov 4, 2024▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Nov 4, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential. · from a complaint
Nov 4, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. · from a complaint
Oct 11, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide proper care or assistance for a resident who uses a prosthesis, such as an artificial limb. · from a complaint
Oct 11, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint
Aug 21, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
May 3, 2024▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
May 3, 2024▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility used bed rails without first trying safer alternatives, or without assessing the resident's safety risk, discussing the risks and benefits with the resident or family, getting consent, and installing the rails correctly. · from a complaint
May 3, 2024▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not run an ongoing quality assurance committee that reviews care problems and creates plans to fix them. · from a complaint
May 3, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · from a complaint
May 3, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication.
May 3, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
May 3, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not allow a resident's chosen representative — often a family member or someone with power of attorney — to exercise the resident's rights on their behalf. When a resident can't speak for themselves, their representative steps into that role. · from a complaint
May 3, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' right to manage their own money and financial affairs. · from a complaint
May 3, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
May 3, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint
Mar 25, 2024▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Mar 25, 2024▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Mar 25, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the right treatment and services for residents with dementia or signs of dementia. Dementia care requires specific approaches, training, and patience. · from a complaint
Mar 25, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not run an ongoing quality assurance committee that reviews care problems and creates plans to fix them. · from a complaint
Feb 2, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' right to voice complaints without discrimination or retaliation, or did not have a working complaint process that resolves issues promptly.
Feb 2, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate treatment and services to residents with a mental health condition, difficulty adjusting emotionally, or a history of trauma or post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD).

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (10 → 1).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202320D
2024206J ▲
202521G ▲
202610D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

5 fines totaling $97,936.

DateTypeAmount / length
Mar 5, 2025Fine$15,015
Oct 11, 2024Fine$16,801
May 3, 2024Fine$49,319
Mar 25, 2024Fine$5,850
Mar 25, 2024Fine$10,951

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityNorth Carolina avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.464.013.95bottom 34% in North Carolina; bottom 35% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.500.640.69bottom 46% in North Carolina; bottom 38% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.053.563.50bottom 32% in North Carolina; bottom 33% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.320.410.48bottom 49% in North Carolina; bottom 36% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)51.749.045.8bottom 43% in North Carolina; bottom 32% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)70.845.742.9bottom 14% in North Carolina; bottom 11% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.78, RN 0.55, weekend 3.32. Staffing rating: 2/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Carolina Cumberland Holdings LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%05/28/2021
Charles 1994 Family Grantor TrustOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest05/28/2021
CK 2008 Family TrustOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest05/28/2021
DRM South LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest05/28/2021
Edward 1998 Family Grantor TrustOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest05/28/2021
Lauren 2020 Family Grantor TrustOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest05/28/2021
Lauren 2020 LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest05/28/2021
Leps 2003 Family TrustOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest05/28/2021
Norman 5571 & Family LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest05/28/2021
Norman 5571 Family Grantor TrustOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest05/28/2021
Norman 5571 LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest05/28/2021
RL 2008 Family TrustOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest05/28/2021
Robin 2008 Family Grantor TrustOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest05/28/2021
Robin 2008 LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest05/28/2021
Saul 2012 Family Grantor TrustOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest05/28/2021
Springrock South LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest05/28/2021
Summer South LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest05/28/2021
Maher, CindyIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE05/28/2021
RSBRM South Manager LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE05/28/2021

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
The Carrolton of Fayetteville3.1 miFayetteville, NC★★★☆☆3/5
Village Green Health and Rehabilitation3.2 miFayetteville, NC★★★★★4/5
Autumn Care of Fayetteville3.7 miFayetteville, NC★★★★★4/5
Haymount Rehabilitation & Nursing Center, INC.5.0 miFayetteville, NC★★★★★5/5
Highland House Rehabilitation and Healthcare6.2 miFayetteville, NC★★☆☆☆3/5
Woodlands Nursing & Rehabilitation Center6.2 miFayetteville, NC★★★★☆4/5
Whispering Pines Nursing & Rehab Center7.9 miFayetteville, NC★★★★★5/5
Bethesda Health Care Facility8.3 miEastover, NC★★★★☆4/5
Autumn Care of Raeford15.1 miRaeford, NC★★☆☆☆3/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Fayetteville →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 345505.