North Carolina ›Connelly Spring
3647 Miller Bridge Road, Connelly Spring, NC 28612 (opens Google Maps) · Burke County · (828) 397-3144· 90 certified beds · avg 86 residents/day · certified since Mar 25, 2003 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: LIFEWORKS REHAB (64 facilities, chain avg rating 2.1★)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
▲ Immediate jeopardy, isolated · Aug 25, 2025 · F-0628 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not provide required paperwork or notices about a resident's needs, their right to appeal a transfer or discharge, or the facility's bed-hold policy (how long a bed is saved during a hospital stay).
Why it matters: Without these notices, a family may not know they can appeal a discharge or that a bed can be held.
Severity (J): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Jul 11, 2025 (Past Non-Compliance)
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Jan 22, 2024 · F-0760 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication.
Why it matters: A serious medication error can cause real harm, hospitalization, or worse.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Feb 17, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
Showing the latest 3 of 20 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not provide required paperwork or notices about a resident's needs, their right to appeal a transfer or discharge, or the facility's bed-hold policy (how long a bed is saved during a hospital stay). · from a complaint F-0628
The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care. F-0578
The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. F-0761
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 25, 2025 | ▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, isolated | The facility did not provide required paperwork or notices about a resident's needs, their right to appeal a transfer or discharge, or the facility's bed-hold policy (how long a bed is saved during a hospital stay). · from a complaint · F-0628 |
| Aug 25, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care. · F-0578 |
| Aug 25, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Aug 25, 2025 | C · Potential for minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day. · F-0732 |
| Aug 1, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · from a complaint · F-0641 |
| Aug 1, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · from a complaint · F-0695 |
| Aug 1, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident. · from a complaint · F-0726 |
| Aug 1, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · from a complaint · F-0812 |
| Aug 1, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · from a complaint · F-0580 |
| Aug 1, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not notify the appropriate authorities when a resident with a mental disorder or intellectual disability had a significant change in condition. · from a complaint · F-0646 |
| Aug 1, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint · F-0656 |
| Aug 1, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · from a complaint · F-0657 |
| Feb 17, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not run an ongoing quality assurance committee that reviews care problems and creates plans to fix them. · from a complaint · F-0867 |
| Feb 17, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint · F-0880 |
| Jan 22, 2024 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. · from a complaint · F-0760 |
| Jan 22, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · from a complaint · F-0695 |
| Feb 9, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it. · F-0697 |
| Feb 9, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677 |
| Feb 9, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not run an ongoing quality assurance committee that reviews care problems and creates plans to fix them. · F-0867 |
| Feb 9, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (8 → 4).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 4 | 0 | E |
| 2024 | 12 | 1 | G ▲ |
| 2025 | 4 | 1 | J ▲ |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
3 fines totaling $26,014.
Every penalty CMS publishes for this facility in the 3-year window is listed —none excluded. The count and the dollar total come from two different CMS datasets and agree for this facility. Penalties older than the window are dropped by CMS before publication, not by us.
| Date | Type | Amount / length |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 25, 2025 | Fine | $16,985 |
| Jan 22, 2024 | Fine | $517 |
| Jan 22, 2024 | Fine | $8,512 |
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | North Carolina avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.54 | 4.01 | 3.95 | bottom 39% in North Carolina; bottom 38% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.52 | 0.64 | 0.69 | bottom 48% in North Carolina; bottom 41% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.22 | 3.56 | 3.50 | bottom 47% in North Carolina; bottom 43% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.47 | 0.41 | 0.48 | top 27% in North Carolina; top 37% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 60.6 | 49.0 | 45.8 | bottom 23% in North Carolina; bottom 15% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 75.0 | 45.7 | 42.9 | bottom 10% in North Carolina; bottom 9% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.90, RN 0.57, weekend 3.55.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.90 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 2/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Carolina Rehab Center of Burke. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carolina Burke Holdings I LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 05/28/2021 |
| Charles 1994 Family Grantor Trust | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 05/28/2021 |
| CK 2008 Family Trust | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 05/28/2021 |
| DRM South LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 05/28/2021 |
| Lauren 2020 Family Grantor Trust | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 05/28/2021 |
| Lauren 2020 LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 05/28/2021 |
| Leps 2003 Family Trust | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 05/28/2021 |
| Norman 5571 & Family LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 05/28/2021 |
| Norman 5571 Family Grantor Trust | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 05/28/2021 |
| Norman 5571 LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 05/28/2021 |
| RL 2008 Family Trust | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 05/28/2021 |
| Robin 2008 Family Grantor Trust | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 05/28/2021 |
| Robin 2008 LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 05/28/2021 |
| Saul 2012 Family Grantor Trust | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 05/28/2021 |
| Springrock South LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 05/28/2021 |
| Summer South LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 05/28/2021 |
| McGroarty, Heather | Individual | W-2 Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/11/2023 |
| McGroarty, Heather | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/11/2023 |
| RSBRM South Manager LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/28/2021 |
All 19 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
CMS lists this facility under the chain Lifeworks Rehab — 64 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 63 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| College Pines Health and Rehabilitation | 3.6 mi | Connelly Springs, NC | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Hickory Falls Health and Rehabilitation | 6.3 mi | Granite Falls, NC | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Trinity Ridge | 6.4 mi | Hickory, NC | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| The Greens at Viewmont | 7.7 mi | Hickory, NC | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Autumn Care of Drexel | 8.0 mi | Morganton, NC | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Trinity Village | 8.6 mi | Hickory, NC | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| The Greens at Hickory | 9.6 mi | Hickory, NC | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Grace Heights Health & Rehabilitation | 10.3 mi | Morganton, NC | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Shaire Nursing Center | 10.6 mi | Lenoir, NC | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Magnolia Lane Nursing and Rehabilitation Center | 12.5 mi | Morganton, NC | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Conover Nursing and Rehabilitation Center | 13.4 mi | Conover, NC | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Hibriten Mountain Nursing and Rehabilitation | 14.1 mi | Lenoir, NC | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 345526.
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details