How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Concordia at Rebecca Residence
3746 Cedar Ridge Road, Allison Park, PA 15101 (opens Google Maps) · Allegheny County · (724) 444-0600· 60 certified beds · avg 57 residents/day · certified since Oct 25, 1999 · Medicare only — not Medicaid certified
Certified for Medicare only. Medicare pays for short rehabilitation stays, not for long-term care — and this facility cannot bill Medicaid, which is what most families rely on for a long stay. Ask what a long-term stay here would cost and how it would be paid for. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: CONCORDIA LUTHERAN MINISTRIES (8 facilities, chain avg rating 3.6★)
3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Jun 25, 2026
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.52
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 28 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. F-0812
The facility did not provide required paperwork or notices about a resident's needs, their right to appeal a transfer or discharge, or the facility's bed-hold policy (how long a bed is saved during a hospital stay). F-0628
The facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. F-0580
View all 28 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 25, 2026 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Jun 25, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide required paperwork or notices about a resident's needs, their right to appeal a transfer or discharge, or the facility's bed-hold policy (how long a bed is saved during a hospital stay). · F-0628 |
| Jun 25, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · F-0580 |
| Jun 25, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Jun 25, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| Jun 25, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration. · F-0692 |
| Jun 25, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Jun 25, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep all essential equipment working safely — things like heating and cooling systems, kitchen equipment, and medical devices. · F-0908 |
| Jun 25, 2026 | B · Potential for minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not honor residents' right to voice complaints without discrimination or retaliation, or did not have a working complaint process that resolves issues promptly. · F-0585 |
| Dec 31, 2025 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care. · from a complaint · F-0725 |
| Mar 13, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Mar 13, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · F-0584 |
| Mar 13, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · F-0600 |
| Mar 13, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable. · F-0655 |
| Mar 13, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657 |
| Aug 15, 2024 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Aug 15, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| Aug 15, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not honor residents' right to voice complaints without discrimination or retaliation, or did not have a working complaint process that resolves issues promptly. · F-0585 |
| Aug 15, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility transferred or discharged a resident without a valid reason, or failed to provide the required documentation and information when moving a resident out. · F-0622 |
| Aug 15, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal. · F-0623 |
| Aug 15, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not give the resident or their representative written notice of how long it would hold the resident's bed during a hospital stay or approved leave. · F-0625 |
| Aug 15, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Aug 15, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · F-0686 |
| Aug 15, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · F-0690 |
| Aug 15, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration. · F-0692 |
| Aug 15, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Jan 10, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection. · from a complaint · F-0607 |
| Jan 10, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint · F-0610 |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (5 → 9).
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2024
All citations: 13
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2025
All citations: 6
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2026
All citations: 9
Serious citations (G–L): 0
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 13 | 0 | F |
| 2025 | 6 | 0 | F |
| 2026 | 9 | 0 | F |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
What these staffing numbers mean →
This facilityPennsylvania averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 3.52
Pennsylvania average: 3.94
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 0.62
Pennsylvania average: 0.80
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 2.83
Pennsylvania average: 3.58
U.S. average: 3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Pennsylvania avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.52 | 3.94 | 3.95 | bottom 44% in Pennsylvania; bottom 38% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.62 | 0.80 | 0.69 | bottom 46% in Pennsylvania; top 46% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 2.83 | 3.58 | 3.50 | bottom 18% in Pennsylvania; bottom 22% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.32 | 0.56 | 0.48 | bottom 28% in Pennsylvania; bottom 36% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 43.5 | 44.5 | 45.8 | top 48% in Pennsylvania; top 46% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 22.2 | 39.9 | 42.9 | top 17% in Pennsylvania; top 17% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.74, RN 0.66, weekend 3.01.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.74 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 3/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5
Costs & payment
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Concordia at Rebecca Residence. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
- Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
- Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
- Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
Who owns this facility
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
Non profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Concordia Lutheran Health and Human Care | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | — | 05/09/2004 |
| Arnold, Rachelle | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2022 |
| Beilstein, Karen | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2022 |
| Creighton, Susan | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2022 |
| Falbo, Michael | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2020 |
| Falbo, Michael | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2019 |
| Falbo, Michael | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2019 |
| Frndak, Keith | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/04/2005 |
| Frndak, Keith | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2006 |
| Frndak, Keith | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2006 |
| Grob, Daniel | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/22/1999 |
| Hagey, Connor | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2017 |
| Heintz, Donna | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2022 |
| Hortert, Brian | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/04/2005 |
| Hortert, Brian | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2016 |
| Hortert, Brian | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2016 |
| Limbaugh, James | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2017 |
| Ricci, Phil | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/27/2021 |
| Ricci, Phil | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/27/2021 |
| Ricci, Phil | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/27/2021 |
All 20 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
Other facilities in the same chain
CMS lists this facility under the chain Concordia Lutheran Ministries — 8 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
- Concordia at the Cedars — Monroeville, PA · overall 5/5
- Concordia at Villa St Joseph — Baden, PA · overall 2/5
- Concordia Lutheran Health and Human Care — Cabot, PA · overall 2/5
- Concordia of the South Hills — Pittsburgh, PA · overall 5/5
- Harmony Physical Rehabilitation — Monroeville, PA · overall 5/5
- Concordia at Sumner — Copley, OH · overall 5/5
- Bethlen HM of the Hungarian RF of America — Ligonier, PA · overall 1/5
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking.
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
- "What written notices do we get before any transfer or discharge, and what is your bed-hold policy?"
- "If my family member falls or their condition changes, exactly when and how will I be notified?"
- "Can you show me an example care plan, and how are families included when it's created and updated?"
- "How do you make sure each resident's care follows the doctor's orders, and what changed after this citation?"
- "How do you monitor residents' weight and eating, and what happens when someone starts losing weight?"
- "Can you show me how medications are stored and secured on the units, including controlled drugs?"
- "How do you inspect and maintain essential equipment, and how quickly are repairs made?"
Also worth asking anywhere
- "Your weekend nurse staffing is reported below the Pennsylvania midpoint — how does the weekend schedule differ from a weekday?"
- "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
- "CMS reports 44% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
- "The ownership record on file lists 20 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
- "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"
Nearby facilities (12 closest of 61 within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kadima Rehabilitation & Nursing at Cheswick | 1.5 mi | Cheswick, PA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuseSFF |
| St Barnabas Nursing Home | 4.6 mi | Gibsonia, PA | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Harmar Village Health & Rehab Center | 6.0 mi | Cheswick, PA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | SFF |
| Willows of Presbyterian Senior | 6.5 mi | Oakmont, PA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| John J Kane Regional Center-Ro | 7.0 mi | Pittsburgh, PA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Perry Health & Rehab Center | 7.7 mi | Wexford, PA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Vincentian Home | 8.0 mi | Pittsburgh, PA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Highland Hills Post Acute | 8.1 mi | Pittsburgh, PA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Eden Nursing & Rehabilitation Center | 8.3 mi | Brackenridge, PA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Longwood at Oakmont | 8.4 mi | Verona, PA | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Southwestern Veterans Center | 8.6 mi | Pittsburgh, PA | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Hillcrest Rehabilitation & Healthcare Center | 8.7 mi | Lower Burrell, PA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Other facilities in the same county
CMS records place this facility in Allegheny, PA — 52 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
- Concordia at RP Home — Pittsburgh, PA · overall 3/5abuse
- Concordia at the Cedars — Monroeville, PA · overall 5/5
- Concordia of the South Hills — Pittsburgh, PA · overall 5/5
- East End Health & Rehab Center — Pittsburgh, PA · overall 3/5
- Eldercrest Rehabilitation & Healthcare Center — Munhall, PA · overall 3/5abuse
- Friendship Village of South Hi — Pittsburgh, PA · overall 3/5
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 396067.