KansasOlathe

Evergreen Community of Johnson County

11875 S Sunset Drive, Suite 100, Olathe, KS 66061 · Johnson County · 44 certified beds · avg 77 residents/day · certified since Jan 1, 1996

4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
2
Serious findings on record
$22,913
Fines, last 3 years
5.73
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · May 1, 2024 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: May 31, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Oct 3, 2023 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Sep 29, 2023 (Past Non-Compliance)

All citations in the current public record (24)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Feb 25, 2026F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Feb 25, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes.
May 1, 2024▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
May 1, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · from a complaint
May 1, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. · from a complaint
May 1, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility allowed residents to lose the ability to do daily activities — like bathing, dressing, and eating — when there was no medical reason for the decline. Good care helps residents keep the abilities they have. · from a complaint
May 1, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle. · from a complaint
May 1, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. · from a complaint
May 1, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not arrange hospice services for a resident who needed them, or help the resident move to a facility that could arrange hospice. Hospice provides comfort-focused care for people nearing the end of life. · from a complaint
Oct 3, 2023▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Sep 19, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Sep 19, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Sep 19, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups.
Sep 19, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offWhen a resident had a planned discharge, the facility did not make sure the necessary information was communicated to the resident and to the doctors or facility taking over their care.
Sep 19, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Sep 19, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline.
Sep 19, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Sep 19, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Sep 19, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.
Sep 19, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Sep 19, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems.
Sep 19, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason.
Sep 19, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.
Sep 19, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (7 → 2).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
2022140E
202311G ▲
202471G ▲
202620F

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

2 fines totaling $22,913, plus 1 Medicare payment denial period.

DateTypeAmount / length
May 1, 2024Fine$12,854
May 1, 2024Payment Denial3 days from May 28, 2024
Oct 3, 2023Fine$10,059

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityKansas avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)5.734.583.95top 14% in Kansas; top 6% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.890.810.69top 33% in Kansas; top 22% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing5.104.053.50top 16% in Kansas; top 6% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.590.490.48top 27% in Kansas; top 24% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)45.348.145.8top 45% in Kansas; bottom 49% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)28.642.042.9top 28% in Kansas; top 26% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 5.26, RN 0.81, weekend 4.68. Staffing rating: 5/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 2/5 · long-stay residents: 2/5 · short-stay residents: —/5

Who owns this facility

Non profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Evergreen Living Innovations INCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%01/01/2003
Amos, PatrickIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2022
Daugherty, DianneIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2018
Daugherty, DianneIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/06/2025
Dupriest, JessicaIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2024
Dwyer, MarkIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2024
Dwyer, MarkIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/06/2025
Gallagher, LindaIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE08/20/2020
Gallagher, LindaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/06/2025
Gash, MarkIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2018
Gash, MarkIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/06/2025
Gash, MaryIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE10/18/2018
Gash, MaryIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/06/2025
Holland, ChrisIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE08/19/2019
Holland, ChrisIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/06/2025
Osborn, ChristopherIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2011
Parise, BrettIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2022
Parise, BrettIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/06/2025
Plowman, AndreaIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2024
Roberts, CharlaIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE10/09/2023

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
The Healthcare Resort of Olathe2.9 miOlathe, KS★★☆☆☆1/5
Azria Health Olathe3.1 miOlathe, KS★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
Good Samaritan-Olathe3.2 miOlathe, KS★★★☆☆2/5
Hoeger House3.3 miOlathe, KS★★★★★4/5
Aberdeen Village4.8 miOlathe, KS★★★★★4/5
Villa St Francis Catholic Care Center INC5.2 miOlathe, KS★★★★★3/5
Meadowbrook Rehabilitation Hospital6.2 miGardner, KS★☆☆☆☆1/5
Nottingham Health and Rehabilitation6.7 miOlathe, KS★★★★★5/5
The Plaza Health Services at Santa Marta7.1 miOlathe, KS★★★★★4/5
Colonial Village7.4 miOverland Park, KS★★☆☆☆2/5
Stratford Commons Rehab & Health Care Center8.0 miOverland Park, KS★★★☆☆3/5
Hillside Village of de Soto Rehabilitation and Nur8.4 miDe Soto, KS★★★★★4/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Olathe →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 175355.