How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
9160 Belvoir Woods Pkwy, Fort Belvoir, VA 22060 (opens Google Maps) · Fairfax County · (703) 799-1333· 56 certified beds · avg 48 residents/day · certified since Aug 2, 1989 · Medicare only — not Medicaid certified
Certified for Medicare only. Medicare pays for short rehabilitation stays, not for long-term care — and this facility cannot bill Medicaid, which is what most families rely on for a long stay. Ask what a long-term stay here would cost and how it would be paid for. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: HEALTHPEAK PROPERTIES, INC. (15 facilities, chain avg rating 3.5★)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Showing the latest 3 of 23 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not give residents important notices in a format and language they can understand — for example, translated documents or accessible formats for those with vision or hearing loss. F-0574
The facility did not post the names, addresses, and phone numbers of state agencies and advocacy groups, along with a notice that residents may file complaints with the state survey agency. F-0575
The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. F-0657
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 18, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not give residents important notices in a format and language they can understand — for example, translated documents or accessible formats for those with vision or hearing loss. · F-0574 |
| Mar 18, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not post the names, addresses, and phone numbers of state agencies and advocacy groups, along with a notice that residents may file complaints with the state survey agency. · F-0575 |
| Mar 18, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657 |
| Mar 18, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677 |
| Mar 18, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have a written plan describing how it runs its quality improvement program — the ongoing process of finding problems in care and fixing them. · F-0865 |
| Mar 18, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · F-0584 |
| Mar 18, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · F-0658 |
| Mar 18, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · F-0686 |
| Mar 18, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Mar 18, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · F-0690 |
| Mar 18, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Mar 18, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not arrange hospice services for a resident who needed them, or help the resident move to a facility that could arrange hospice. Hospice provides comfort-focused care for people nearing the end of life. · F-0849 |
| Mar 18, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not educate residents and staff about COVID-19 vaccination, offer the vaccine to those eligible after that education, or properly document everyone's vaccination status. · F-0887 |
| Mar 18, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have a working call system — the button or cord residents use to summon help — in each resident's bathroom and bathing area. · F-0919 |
| Jan 11, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. · F-0758 |
| Jan 11, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Aug 11, 2021 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · F-0686 |
| Aug 11, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. · F-0558 |
| Aug 11, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Aug 11, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · F-0658 |
| Aug 11, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Aug 11, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Aug 11, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (2 → 14).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 7 | 0 | E |
| 2023 | 2 | 0 | D |
| 2026 | 14 | 0 | E |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Virginia avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 5.45 | 3.67 | 3.95 | top 9% in Virginia; top 8% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.58 | 0.66 | 0.69 | top 40% in Virginia; bottom 49% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 5.12 | 3.21 | 3.50 | top 5% in Virginia; top 5% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.46 | 0.46 | 0.48 | top 25% in Virginia; top 38% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 56.2 | 48.1 | 45.8 | bottom 32% in Virginia; bottom 23% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 73.7 | 48.2 | 42.9 | bottom 13% in Virginia; bottom 9% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.96, RN 0.53, weekend 4.66.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (4.96 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 4/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 2/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Belvoir Woods Health Care Center at the Fairfax. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HCP S-H 2014 Member LLC | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/02/2024 |
| HCP S-H Opco TRS LLC | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2020 |
| HCP S-H Sunrise Opco Holdco LLC | Organization | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2020 |
| Healthpeak Op LLC | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/06/2020 |
| Healthpeak Properties INC | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2020 |
| S-H 2014 Opco TRS INC | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/02/2024 |
| Bown, Keith | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/16/2025 |
| Bown, Keith | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/16/2025 |
| Carter, Stephanie | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2010 |
| Carter, Stephanie | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2010 |
| Cheng, Patrick | Individual | Individual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/28/2025 |
| Coelho, Andrew | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/16/2025 |
| Coelho, Andrew | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/16/2025 |
| Dabbenigno, Peter | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/16/2025 |
| Dabbenigno, Peter | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/16/2025 |
| Falco, Denise | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/16/2025 |
| Falco, Denise | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/16/2025 |
| Frantz, Edward | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/16/2025 |
| Frantz, Edward | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/16/2025 |
| Harris, Tony | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/16/2025 |
Showing 20 of 45 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 25 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
CMS lists this facility under the chain Healthpeak Properties, INC. — 15 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 14 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Greenspring Village | 4.1 mi | Springfield, VA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Westminster at Lake Ridge | 4.9 mi | Lake Ridge, VA | ★★★★★ | 3/5 | |
| Belmont Bay Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center | 6.1 mi | Woodbridge, VA | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Mount Vernon Healthcare Center | 6.3 mi | Alexandria, VA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Burke Health & Rehabilitation Center | 7.1 mi | Burke, VA | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| August Healthcare at Leewood | 7.1 mi | Annandale, VA | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| George Washington Health & Rehabilitation | 7.3 mi | Alexandria, VA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Annandale Healthcare Center | 8.8 mi | Annandale, VA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Woodbine Rehabilitation & Healthcare Center | 9.7 mi | Alexandria, VA | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Goodwin House Alexandria | 9.7 mi | Alexandria, VA | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Alexandria Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center | 10.3 mi | Alexandria, VA | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Goodwin House Bailey's Crossroads | 10.6 mi | Falls Church, VA | ★★★★★ | 4/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Fairfax, VA — 13 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 495197.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details