8041 State Rd 52, Hudson, FL 34667 (opens Google Maps) · Pasco County · (727) 863-5488· 120 certified beds · avg 104 residents/day · certified since Sep 15, 1981 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: HEALTH SERVICES MANAGEMENT (16 facilities, chain avg rating 2.9★)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5 · how star ratings work →
⚠ The most recent standard health inspection was more than 2 years ago — conditions may have changed.
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
▲ Immediate jeopardy, isolated · Oct 27, 2023 · F-0600 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.
Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.
Severity (J): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Nov 14, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Immediate jeopardy, isolated · Oct 27, 2023 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (J): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Nov 14, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
Showing the latest 3 of 20 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need. F-0644
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. F-0689
The facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems. F-0756
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 14, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need. · F-0644 |
| Mar 14, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Mar 14, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems. · F-0756 |
| Mar 14, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| Mar 14, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657 |
| Mar 14, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| Dec 18, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint · F-0755 |
| Oct 27, 2023 | ▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, isolated | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint · F-0600 |
| Oct 27, 2023 | ▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Oct 27, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint · F-0609 |
| Oct 27, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint · F-0610 |
| Dec 16, 2021 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not enter each resident's assessment information into the required format and send it to the state within 7 days of completing the assessment, as the rules require. · F-0640 |
| Dec 16, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| Dec 16, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. · F-0759 |
| Dec 16, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not regularly inspect bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails for safety, or the rails and mattresses were not attached safely to the frames. · F-0909 |
| Oct 2, 2020 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| Oct 2, 2020 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Oct 2, 2020 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677 |
| Oct 2, 2020 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| Oct 2, 2020 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (4 → 6).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | 5 | 0 | D |
| 2021 | 4 | 0 | E |
| 2023 | 5 | 2 | J ▲ |
| 2024 | 6 | 0 | E |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
1 fine totaling $34,053.
Every penalty CMS publishes for this facility in the 3-year window is listed —none excluded. The count and the dollar total come from two different CMS datasets and agree for this facility. Penalties older than the window are dropped by CMS before publication, not by us.
| Date | Type | Amount / length |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 27, 2023 | Fine | $34,053 |
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Florida avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.70 | 4.03 | 3.95 | bottom 33% in Florida; bottom 47% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.70 | 0.76 | 0.69 | top 45% in Florida; top 36% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.43 | 3.68 | 3.50 | bottom 38% in Florida; top 46% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.55 | 0.53 | 0.48 | top 37% in Florida; top 28% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 55.8 | 41.4 | 45.8 | bottom 16% in Florida; bottom 23% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 69.2 | 46.0 | 42.9 | bottom 12% in Florida; bottom 12% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.57, RN 0.68, weekend 3.31.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.57 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 3/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 1/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Bear Creek Nursing Center. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
Non profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Health Services Management, INC. | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 10/01/2000 |
| Baxter, Kevin | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/20/2008 |
| Baxter, Kevin | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/20/2008 |
| Fisher, Scott | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/02/2012 |
| Fisher, Scott | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/20/2008 |
| Health Services Management, INC. | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2000 |
| Jackson, Brian | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/20/2008 |
| Jackson, Brian | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/20/2008 |
| National Health Investors, INC. | Organization | 5% or Greater Mortgage Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/20/2008 |
| National Health Investors, INC. | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/20/2008 |
| Nhi-Reit of Florida, LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Mortgage Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/20/2008 |
| Nhi-Reit of Florida, LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/20/2008 |
| Shatz, Jim | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/06/2021 |
| Shatz, Jim | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/06/2021 |
| Talanga, Mario | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/20/2008 |
| Talanga, Mario | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/20/2008 |
| Timmons, Teresa | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/07/2022 |
| Timmons, Teresa | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/07/2022 |
| White, Joshua | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/20/2008 |
| White, Joshua | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/20/2008 |
All 20 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
CMS lists this facility under the chain Health Services Management — 16 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 15 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Solaris Healthcare Bayonet Point | 1.2 mi | Hudson, FL | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Windsor Woods Rehab and Healthcare Center | 1.9 mi | Hudson, FL | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Bayonet Point Health Center by Harborview | 1.9 mi | Hudson, FL | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Heather Hill Healthcare Center | 5.3 mi | New Port Richey, FL | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Madison Pointe Care Center | 5.8 mi | New Port Richey, FL | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Nursing & Rehabilitation Center of New Port Richey | 5.9 mi | New Port Richey, FL | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Southern Pines Nursing Center | 6.0 mi | New Port Richey, FL | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Aspire at Ridge Haven | 7.1 mi | New Port Richey, FL | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Life Care Center of New Port Richey | 7.2 mi | New Port Richey, FL | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Trinity Regional Rehab Center | 8.6 mi | Trinity, FL | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Peninsula Health Center by Harborview | 12.0 mi | Tarpon Springs, FL | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Tarpon Bayou Center | 13.5 mi | Tarpon Springs, FL | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Pasco, FL — 18 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 105393.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details