FloridaNew Port Richey

Heather Hill Healthcare Center

6630 Kentucky Ave, New Port Richey, FL 34653 · Pasco County · 105 certified beds · avg 91 residents/day · certified since May 1, 1979

Part of chain: HEALTH SERVICES MANAGEMENT (16 facilities, chain avg rating 2.9★)

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
1
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.72
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5

⚠ The most recent standard health inspection was more than 2 years ago — conditions may have changed.

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · May 20, 2026 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Jun 18, 2026 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (25)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
May 20, 2026▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Oct 22, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature. · from a complaint
Jun 6, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services.
Jun 6, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Jun 6, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care.
Jun 6, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not properly inform residents or their representatives about arbitration agreements — contracts that give up the right to sue in court — including their right to refuse to sign.
Jun 6, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jun 6, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Jun 6, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' right to voice complaints without discrimination or retaliation, or did not have a working complaint process that resolves issues promptly.
Jun 6, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need.
Jun 6, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Mar 16, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not run an ongoing quality assurance committee that reviews care problems and creates plans to fix them.
Mar 16, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Mar 16, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate.
Mar 16, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Mar 16, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Mar 16, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline.
Mar 16, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason.
Mar 16, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.
Mar 16, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
Mar 16, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Mar 16, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility's quality committee — the internal group responsible for finding and fixing care problems — did not have the required members or did not meet at least every three months.
Jan 15, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Jan 15, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Jan 15, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not safely and appropriately administer IV fluids (fluids given through a vein) for residents who needed them.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (11 → 9).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202130D
2022110E
2024100E
202611G ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityFlorida avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.724.033.95bottom 35% in Florida; bottom 48% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.610.760.69bottom 43% in Florida; top 46% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.493.683.50bottom 46% in Florida; top 42% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.220.530.48bottom 7% in Florida; bottom 16% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)38.241.445.8top 40% in Florida; top 32% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)33.346.042.9top 25% in Florida; top 33% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.44, RN 0.57, weekend 3.23. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 2/5

Who owns this facility

Non profit - Other

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Health Services Management, INC.Organization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%10/01/2000
Baxter, KevinIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE02/20/2008
Baxter, KevinIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE02/20/2008
Dilella, VincentIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2022
Dilella, VincentIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2022
Fisher, ScottIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE04/02/2012
Fisher, ScottIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE02/20/2008
Flores-Dejesus, LisaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE08/18/2023
Flores-Dejesus, LisaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE08/18/2023
Health Services Management, INC.OrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2000
Jackson, BrianIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE02/20/2008
Jackson, BrianIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE02/20/2008
National Health Investors, INC.Organization5% or Greater Mortgage InterestNOT APPLICABLE02/20/2008
National Health Investors, INC.OrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE02/20/2008
Nhi-Reit of Florida, LLCOrganization5% or Greater Mortgage InterestNOT APPLICABLE02/20/2008
Nhi-Reit of Florida, LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE02/20/2008
Shatz, JimIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE04/06/2021
Shatz, JimIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE02/20/2008
White, JoshuaIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE02/20/2008
White, JoshuaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE02/20/2008

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Southern Pines Nursing Center0.6 miNew Port Richey, FL★★☆☆☆2/5
Nursing & Rehabilitation Center of New Port Richey0.6 miNew Port Richey, FL★☆☆☆☆2/5
Madison Pointe Care Center0.7 miNew Port Richey, FL★★★☆☆2/5abuse
Aspire at Ridge Haven1.8 miNew Port Richey, FL★★★☆☆3/5
Life Care Center of New Port Richey2.1 miNew Port Richey, FL★★★★☆3/5
Trinity Regional Rehab Center3.8 miTrinity, FL★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
Bear Creek Nursing Center5.3 miHudson, FL★★☆☆☆2/5
Solaris Healthcare Bayonet Point5.7 miHudson, FL★★★☆☆2/5
Peninsula Health Center by Harborview6.6 miTarpon Springs, FL★★★☆☆3/5
Windsor Woods Rehab and Healthcare Center6.9 miHudson, FL★★★☆☆3/5
Bayonet Point Health Center by Harborview7.2 miHudson, FL★★★☆☆3/5
Tarpon Bayou Center8.2 miTarpon Springs, FL★☆☆☆☆1/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in New Port Richey →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 105343.