How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
6140 Congress St, New Port Richey, FL 34653 (opens Google Maps) · Pasco County · (727) 842-8402· 120 certified beds · avg 93 residents/day · certified since Oct 27, 1978 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: BENJAMIN LANDA (48 facilities, chain avg rating 3.4★)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5 · how star ratings work →
⚠ The most recent standard health inspection was more than 2 years ago — conditions may have changed.
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Showing the latest 3 of 26 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint F-0689
The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint F-0584
The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint F-0684
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 24, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Jun 11, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint · F-0584 |
| Jun 11, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint · F-0684 |
| Jun 11, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint · F-0842 |
| Jun 11, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · from a complaint · F-0580 |
| Jun 11, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint · F-0880 |
| Oct 19, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not honor residents' right to form and take part in resident or family groups, such as a resident council. · F-0565 |
| Oct 19, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| Oct 19, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Oct 19, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Oct 19, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not honor residents' right to make their own choices about their daily lives, such as when to wake up, what to eat, or how to spend their time. · F-0561 |
| Oct 19, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Oct 19, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline. · F-0688 |
| Oct 19, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Oct 19, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide necessary behavioral health care and services — support for residents' mental and emotional wellbeing, including conditions like depression and anxiety. · F-0740 |
| Oct 19, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. · F-0759 |
| Sep 3, 2021 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not maintain an effective pest control program to prevent or deal with mice, insects, or other pests. · F-0925 |
| Sep 3, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · F-0584 |
| Sep 3, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Sep 3, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Sep 3, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail. · F-0698 |
| Jan 10, 2020 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Jan 10, 2020 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657 |
| Jan 10, 2020 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. · F-0759 |
| Jan 10, 2020 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Jan 10, 2020 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (5 → 10).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | 5 | 0 | E |
| 2021 | 5 | 0 | F |
| 2023 | 10 | 0 | E |
| 2025 | 5 | 0 | E |
| 2026 | 1 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Florida avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.66 | 4.03 | 3.95 | bottom 29% in Florida; bottom 44% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.57 | 0.76 | 0.69 | bottom 33% in Florida; bottom 48% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.40 | 3.68 | 3.50 | bottom 34% in Florida; top 47% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.32 | 0.53 | 0.48 | bottom 25% in Florida; bottom 36% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 58.7 | 41.4 | 45.8 | bottom 10% in Florida; bottom 18% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 79.2 | 46.0 | 42.9 | bottom 5% in Florida; bottom 6% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.44, RN 0.54, weekend 3.20.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.44 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 2/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 2/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 1/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Southern Pines Nursing Center. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fischel, Mayer | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 10/08/2022 |
| Flnho Capital Group LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 10/08/2022 |
| Southern Pines Nursing Member LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 10/07/2022 |
| Tampa 2 Opco Partners LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 10/08/2022 |
| ZBL-18 LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 10/08/2022 |
| Aston Healthcare LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/15/2025 |
| Fortino, Victoria | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/24/2023 |
| Kwapil, Erin | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/04/2024 |
| Kwapil, Erin | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/15/2025 |
| Landa, Benjamin | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/08/2022 |
| Thacker, Tricia | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/04/2022 |
| Wilson, Heidi-Lynn | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/25/2025 |
All 12 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
CMS lists this facility under the chain Benjamin Landa — 48 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 47 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nursing & Rehabilitation Center of New Port Richey | 0.3 mi | New Port Richey, FL | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Madison Pointe Care Center | 0.6 mi | New Port Richey, FL | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Heather Hill Healthcare Center | 0.6 mi | New Port Richey, FL | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Aspire at Ridge Haven | 1.2 mi | New Port Richey, FL | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Life Care Center of New Port Richey | 1.6 mi | New Port Richey, FL | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Trinity Regional Rehab Center | 3.3 mi | Trinity, FL | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Bear Creek Nursing Center | 6.0 mi | Hudson, FL | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Peninsula Health Center by Harborview | 6.0 mi | Tarpon Springs, FL | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Solaris Healthcare Bayonet Point | 6.3 mi | Hudson, FL | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Windsor Woods Rehab and Healthcare Center | 7.5 mi | Hudson, FL | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Tarpon Bayou Center | 7.7 mi | Tarpon Springs, FL | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Bayonet Point Health Center by Harborview | 7.8 mi | Hudson, FL | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Pasco, FL — 18 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 105275.
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details