TexasHouston

Focused Care at Westwood

8702 Course Drive, Houston, TX 77099 · Harris County · 125 certified beds · avg 99 residents/day · certified since Nov 1, 2006

Part of chain: FOCUSED POST ACUTE CARE PARTNERS (25 facilities, chain avg rating 1.9★)

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
1
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.11
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Dec 1, 2022 · F-0689

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Jan 1, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (27)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Jun 16, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · from a complaint
Nov 6, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · from a complaint
Nov 6, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
Mar 14, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Mar 14, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have a policy covering how food brought in by family and visitors is used and stored safely.
Mar 14, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Mar 14, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · from a complaint
Mar 14, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Mar 14, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes. · from a complaint
Mar 14, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it. · from a complaint
Mar 14, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. · from a complaint
Mar 14, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Mar 7, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint
Mar 7, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Apr 11, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need. · from a complaint
Jan 26, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline.
Jan 26, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Jan 26, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.
Jan 26, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
Dec 1, 2022▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Dec 1, 2022F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Dec 1, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Dec 1, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Dec 1, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident.
Dec 1, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Dec 1, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Dec 1, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (4 → 9).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202281G ▲
202450E
2025130F
202610E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityTexas avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.113.463.95bottom 31% in Texas; bottom 18% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.220.440.69bottom 11% in Texas; bottom 3% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing2.723.043.50bottom 31% in Texas; bottom 17% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.170.340.48bottom 13% in Texas; bottom 7% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)38.955.345.8top 18% in Texas; top 34% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)28.654.642.9top 15% in Texas; top 26% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.08, RN 0.22, weekend 2.69. Staffing rating: 1/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: —/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Partnership

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Fpacp Houston LLCOrganizationDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE05/20/2019
Bailey, KeishaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE09/09/2024
Bailey, KeishaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE09/09/2024
Carson, SabrinaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE05/23/2022
Conley, ShawnIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE03/07/2019
Conley, ShawnIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE05/20/2019
Focused Post Acute Care Partners LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE05/20/2019
Focused Post Acute Care Partners LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/11/2025
Focused Post Acute Care Partners Management, LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE05/20/2019
Focused Post Acute Care Partners Management, LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/04/2025
Fpacp Houston LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE05/20/2019
McKenzie, MarkIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE03/07/2019
McKenzie, MarkIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE05/20/2019
Ngo, MichaelIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE05/20/2019
Ngo, MichaelIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/20/2019
Robinson-Cobbin, RobbieIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/11/2024
Robinson-Cobbin, RobbieIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/04/2025
Strubbe, LorettaIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE03/07/2019
Strubbe, LorettaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE05/20/2019

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Houston Transitional Care2.2 miHouston, TX★★★☆☆4/5
The Lev at Town Park2.5 miHouston, TX★☆☆☆☆1/5
Focused Care at Beechnut2.6 miHouston, TX★★☆☆☆1/5
West Houston Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center3.2 miHouston, TX★☆☆☆☆1/5
Clarewood House Extended Care Center3.5 miHouston, TX★★★★★5/5
Sharpview Residence and Rehabilitation Center3.5 miHouston, TX★☆☆☆☆2/5
Seven Acres Jewish Senior Care Services3.9 miHouston, TX★★★★☆3/5
Treemont Health Care Center4.5 miHouston, TX★★★★☆3/5
Ffiii Houston SNF Tenant LLC5.0 miHouston, TX★★★★☆3/5
Woodway Nursing & Rehab5.1 miHouston, TX—/5SFF
Avir at Houston5.5 miHouston, TX★☆☆☆☆1/5
Continuing Care at Eagles Trace5.5 miHouston, TX★★★★☆4/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Houston →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 676116.