OregonScappoose

Avalon Care Center - Scappoose

33910 E. Columbia Avenue, Scappoose, OR 97056 · Columbia County · 40 certified beds · avg 31 residents/day · certified since Oct 1, 2018

Part of chain: AVALON HEALTH CARE (16 facilities, chain avg rating 3.4★)

4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
1
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
5.27
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Aug 16, 2024 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Dec 6, 2023 (Past Non-Compliance)

All citations in the current public record (18)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Apr 3, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Dec 19, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide required paperwork or notices about a resident's needs, their right to appeal a transfer or discharge, or the facility's bed-hold policy (how long a bed is saved during a hospital stay).
Dec 19, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Dec 19, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not fully assess residents on time — a complete assessment of health, abilities, and needs is required when a resident is first admitted and at least once every 12 months after that.
Dec 19, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Dec 19, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility allowed residents to lose the ability to do daily activities — like bathing, dressing, and eating — when there was no medical reason for the decline. Good care helps residents keep the abilities they have.
Dec 19, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Dec 19, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle.
Dec 19, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Dec 19, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline.
Aug 26, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' right to voice complaints without discrimination or retaliation, or did not have a working complaint process that resolves issues promptly. · from a complaint
Aug 16, 2024▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Aug 16, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature.
Aug 16, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Aug 16, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Dec 13, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Dec 13, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.
Dec 13, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (4 → 9).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
201930D
202441G ▲
2025100E
202610D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityOregon avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)5.275.423.95bottom 42% in Oregon; top 10% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.590.780.69bottom 38% in Oregon; top 49% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing4.814.853.50top 49% in Oregon; top 8% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.450.480.48top 37% in Oregon; top 40% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)43.647.445.8top 41% in Oregon; top 46% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)85.751.642.9bottom 7% in Oregon; bottom 3% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 5.36, RN 0.60, weekend 4.89. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 1/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Avalon Holding INCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%07/01/2024
Avalon Health Care INCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2024
Avalon Health Care INCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2024
Avalon Health Care Management INCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2024
Avalon Health Care Management INCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/11/2025
Avalon Holding INCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2024
Avalon Real Estate LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2024
Avalon Realty - Scappoose LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2024
Borisevich, MariaIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE01/08/2024
Borisevich, MariaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/08/2024
Borisevich, MariaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/08/2024
Dangerfield, DavidIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2024
Dangerfield, DavidIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2024
Fathizadeh, ArashIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE12/16/2024
Fathizadeh, ArashIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/16/2024
Hash, AlanIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2024
Hash, AlanIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2024
Hutchinson, JonathanIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2025
Hutchinson, JonathanIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2025
Hyrum a Kirton Individual TrOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2025

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Saint Helens Post Acute7.6 miSaint Helens, OR★★☆☆☆1/5abuseSFF
Salmon Creek Post Acute & Rehabilitation11.3 miVancouver, WA★★★☆☆3/5
Woodland Convalescent Center11.4 miWoodland, WA★★☆☆☆3/5
Bridge Crest Post Acute11.7 miVancouver, WA★★☆☆☆2/5
The Oaks at Timberline12.3 miVancouver, WA★★★★★5/5
Marquis Piedmont Post Acute Rehab16.0 miPortland, OR★★★★☆4/5
Brookfield Health and Rehab of Cascadia16.0 miBattle Ground, WA★★★☆☆3/5
Vancouver Specialty and Rehab Care16.2 miVancouver, WA★★★★☆4/5
Hillsboro Health and Rehabilitation16.2 miHillsboro, OR★★★★☆4/5
Hudson Bay Health and Rehabilitation16.2 miVancouver, WA★★★★★5/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Scappoose →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 385283.