Oregon ›Scappoose

Avalon Care Center - Scappoose

Costs & paymentPlan a visit

33910 E. Columbia Avenue, Scappoose, OR 97056 (opens Google Maps) · Columbia County · (503) 543-7131· 40 certified beds · avg 31 residents/day · certified since Oct 1, 2018 · Medicare and Medicaid certified

Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →

Part of chain: AVALON HEALTH CARE (16 facilities, chain avg rating 3.4★)

4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Dec 19, 2025
1
Serious findings on record
most recent Aug 16, 2024
$0
Fines, last 3 years
5.27
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

New to these records? How to read an inspection report →

Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5 · how star ratings work →

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, isolated · Aug 16, 2024 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.

Corrected: Dec 6, 2023 (Past Non-Compliance)

Inspection findings in the public record

Showing the latest 3 of 18 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.

  1. D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated

    The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint F-0684

  2. E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern

    The facility did not provide required paperwork or notices about a resident's needs, their right to appeal a transfer or discharge, or the facility's bed-hold policy (how long a bed is saved during a hospital stay). F-0628

  3. D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated

    The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. F-0584

View all 18 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Apr 3, 2026D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint · F-0684
Dec 19, 2025E · Potential for more than minimal harm, patternThe facility did not provide required paperwork or notices about a resident's needs, their right to appeal a transfer or discharge, or the facility's bed-hold policy (how long a bed is saved during a hospital stay). · F-0628
Dec 19, 2025D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · F-0584
Dec 19, 2025D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not fully assess residents on time — a complete assessment of health, abilities, and needs is required when a resident is first admitted and at least once every 12 months after that. · F-0636
Dec 19, 2025D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656
Dec 19, 2025D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility allowed residents to lose the ability to do daily activities — like bathing, dressing, and eating — when there was no medical reason for the decline. Good care helps residents keep the abilities they have. · F-0676
Dec 19, 2025D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677
Dec 19, 2025D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle. · F-0679
Dec 19, 2025D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · F-0686
Dec 19, 2025D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline. · F-0688
Aug 26, 2025D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not honor residents' right to voice complaints without discrimination or retaliation, or did not have a working complaint process that resolves issues promptly. · from a complaint · F-0585
Aug 16, 2024▲ G · Actual harm, isolatedThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689
Aug 16, 2024E · Potential for more than minimal harm, patternThe facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature. · F-0804
Aug 16, 2024E · Potential for more than minimal harm, patternThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812
Aug 16, 2024D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656
Dec 13, 2019D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · F-0550
Dec 13, 2019D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · F-0600
Dec 13, 2019D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (4 → 9).

Citations by recorded inspection yearPublished citation counts, not a quality score · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2019
All citations: 3
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2024
All citations: 4
Serious citations (G–L): 1
2025
All citations: 10
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2026
All citations: 1
Serious citations (G–L): 0

All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
201930D
202441G ▲
2025100E
202610D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

How to file a complaint about care →

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

What these staffing numbers mean →

Nurse time, in contextAdjusted hours per resident per day · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01
This facilityOregon averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 5.27
Oregon average: 5.42
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 0.59
Oregon average: 0.78
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 4.81
Oregon average: 4.85
U.S. average: 3.50

All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.

MeasureThis facilityOregon avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)5.275.423.95bottom 42% in Oregon; top 10% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.590.780.69bottom 38% in Oregon; top 49% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing4.814.853.50top 49% in Oregon; top 8% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.450.480.48top 37% in Oregon; top 40% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)43.647.445.8top 41% in Oregon; top 46% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)85.751.642.9bottom 7% in Oregon; bottom 3% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 5.36, RN 0.60, weekend 4.89.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (5.36 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Quality measures: assessments & claims

Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.

Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 1/5

Costs & payment

Price evidence · separate from quality

No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Avalon Care Center - Scappoose. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.

Calculate a stay from a quote you receive

Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.

Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.

Before you compare prices

  • Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
  • Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
  • Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.

Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price

Who owns this facility

How to read ownership records →

Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Avalon Holding INCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%07/01/2024
Avalon Health Care INCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2024
Avalon Health Care INCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2024
Avalon Health Care Management INCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2024
Avalon Health Care Management INCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/11/2025
Avalon Holding INCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2024
Avalon Real Estate LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2024
Avalon Realty - Scappoose LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2024
Borisevich, MariaIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE01/08/2024
Borisevich, MariaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/08/2024
Borisevich, MariaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/08/2024
Dangerfield, DavidIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2024
Dangerfield, DavidIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2024
Fathizadeh, ArashIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE12/16/2024
Fathizadeh, ArashIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/16/2024
Hash, AlanIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2024
Hash, AlanIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2024
Hutchinson, JonathanIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2025
Hutchinson, JonathanIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2025
Hyrum a Kirton Individual TrOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2025

Showing 20 of 42 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 22 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.

Other facilities in the same chain

CMS lists this facility under the chain Avalon Health Care — 16 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.

Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 15 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.

Questions to ask on your visit

Full visit checklist →

Print visit checklist

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

  • "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
  • "How do you make sure each resident's care follows the doctor's orders, and what changed after this citation?"
  • "What written notices do we get before any transfer or discharge, and what is your bed-hold policy?"
  • "Can we tour the resident rooms, bathrooms, and common areas today, including areas not on the usual tour route?"
  • "How soon after admission is a full assessment completed, and how are the findings shared with the family?"
  • "Can you show me an example care plan, and how are families included when it's created and updated?"
  • "How do you help residents maintain their daily living skills, and how do you measure whether it's working?"
  • "How many aides are on each shift, and how do you make sure every resident gets timely help with bathing, dressing, and meals?"

Also worth asking anywhere

  • "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
  • "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
  • "CMS reports 44% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
  • "The ownership record on file lists 42 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
  • "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"

Nearby facilities (12 closest of 21 within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Saint Helens Post Acute7.6 miSaint Helens, OR★★☆☆☆1/5abuseSFF
Salmon Creek Post Acute & Rehabilitation11.3 miVancouver, WA★★★☆☆3/5
Woodland Convalescent Center11.4 miWoodland, WA★★☆☆☆3/5
Bridge Crest Post Acute11.8 miVancouver, WA★★☆☆☆2/5
The Oaks at Timberline12.3 miVancouver, WA★★★★★5/5
Marquis Piedmont Post Acute Rehab16.0 miPortland, OR★★★★☆4/5
Brookfield Health and Rehab of Cascadia16.0 miBattle Ground, WA★★★☆☆3/5
Vancouver Specialty and Rehab Care16.1 miVancouver, WA★★★★☆4/5
Hillsboro Health and Rehabilitation16.2 miHillsboro, OR★★★★☆4/5
Hudson Bay Health and Rehabilitation16.2 miVancouver, WA★★★★★5/5
Avamere Rehabilitation of Hillsboro17.3 miHillsboro, OR★★★☆☆2/5
Fernhill Rehabilitation and Care17.6 miPortland, OR★★☆☆☆2/5abuse

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Scappoose →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 385283.

Your research

Viewed & saved homes

Kept in this browser tab for this session. Choose to remember them only on a device you trust. Opening a record or comparison sends its usual page request.

Selected for comparison

Recently viewed

Prices entered in a cost worksheet stay on that page and are not saved. Privacy details