Grove Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center and Reh

Name: Grove Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center and Reh
Address: 124 W NORVELL BRYANT HWY, Hernando, FL, 34442, US
Telephone: 3522493100

124 W Norvell Bryant Hwy, Hernando, FL 34442 · Citrus County · 120 certified beds · avg 108 residents/day · certified since Jul 12, 2001

Part of chain: GOLD FL TRUST II (36 facilities, chain avg rating 3.4★)

2/5

Health inspection rating (on-site)

Serious findings on record

$167,954

Fines, last 3 years

3.82

Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · May 2, 2025 · F-0684 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.

Why it matters: Care that strays from doctor's orders or ignores the resident's wishes can lead to declining health and avoidable harm.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Jun 2, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · May 2, 2025 · F-0835 · triggered by a complaint

The facility was not managed in a way that uses its money, staff, and resources effectively and efficiently to care for residents.

Why it matters: Poor administration often shows up as understaffing, supply shortages, and care problems across the whole facility.

Corrected: Jun 2, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · May 2, 2025 · F-0867 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not run an ongoing quality assurance committee that reviews care problems and creates plans to fix them.

Why it matters: Without a working quality program, the same care problems tend to repeat instead of getting fixed.

Corrected: Jun 2, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (30)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

Date	Severity	What the facility was cited for
Jun 19, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Jun 19, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need.
Jun 19, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Jun 19, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Jun 19, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Jun 19, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
Jun 19, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide food that accounts for each resident's allergies, intolerances, and personal preferences, or did not offer appealing alternatives.
Jun 19, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.
Jun 19, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
May 2, 2025	▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-off	The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
May 2, 2025	▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-off	The facility was not managed in a way that uses its money, staff, and resources effectively and efficiently to care for residents. · from a complaint
May 2, 2025	▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-off	The facility did not run an ongoing quality assurance committee that reviews care problems and creates plans to fix them. · from a complaint
May 2, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint
Jun 28, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
Mar 28, 2024	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Mar 28, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Mar 28, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Mar 28, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Mar 28, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Mar 28, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
Mar 28, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.
Mar 28, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Nov 18, 2022	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Nov 18, 2022	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Nov 18, 2022	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Nov 18, 2022	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Nov 18, 2022	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Nov 18, 2022	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.
Nov 18, 2022	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Nov 18, 2022	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (8 → 9).

Year	Citations	Serious (G–L)	Worst severity that year
2022	8	0	E
2024	9	0	E
2025	13	3	J ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $167,954.

Date	Type	Amount / length
May 2, 2025	Fine	$167,954

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

Measure	This facility	Florida avg	U.S. avg	Where it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)	3.82	4.03	3.95	bottom 47% in Florida; top 47% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours	0.40	0.76	0.69	bottom 8% in Florida; bottom 22% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing	3.52	3.68	3.50	bottom 49% in Florida; top 41% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)	0.44	0.53	0.48	bottom 49% in Florida; top 41% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)	51.7	41.4	45.8	bottom 24% in Florida; bottom 32% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)	56.3	46.0	42.9	bottom 29% in Florida; bottom 26% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.89, RN 0.40, weekend 3.57. Staffing rating: 2/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / manager	Type	Role	Stake	Since
Citrus Hills Nursing and Rehab Holdco LLC	Organization	5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest	100%	03/25/2022
FL Master Opco Holdco LLC	Organization	5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest	95%	07/27/2022
Pedersen, Matthew	Individual	W-2 Managing Employee	NOT APPLICABLE	07/27/2022
Scheiner, Moshe	Individual	Corporate Officer	NOT APPLICABLE	07/27/2022

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

"How do you make sure each resident's care follows the doctor's orders, and what changed after this citation?"
"What were the findings behind this administration citation, and what has leadership changed since?"
"How does your quality committee work, and can you give an example of a problem it recently identified and fixed?"
"Who completes resident assessments here, and how do you check them for accuracy?"
"How do you identify and arrange specialized services for residents with mental health conditions or disabilities?"
"Who is on the team that builds each resident's care plan, and how quickly is it in place after admission?"
"How many residents here use oxygen or breathing equipment, and who checks that equipment each shift?"
"What is your current medication error rate, and what have you changed to bring errors down?"
"What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
"Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

Facility	Distance	City	Overall	Inspection
Aviata at Brentwood	1.8 mi	Lecanto, FL	★★☆☆☆	2/5
Diamond Ridge Health and Rehabilitation Center	2.5 mi	Lecanto, FL	★★★★★	4/5
Life Care Center of Citrus County	3.7 mi	Lecanto, FL	★★★★★	4/5
Arbor Trail Rehab and Skilled Nursing Center	7.2 mi	Inverness, FL	★★★★★	4/5
Citrus Health and Rehabilitation Center	7.6 mi	Inverness, FL	★★★★☆	3/5
Avante at Inverness INC	7.9 mi	Inverness, FL	★★★★☆	3/5
Crystal River Health and Rehabilitation Center	8.1 mi	Crystal River, FL	★★★★☆	3/5
Cypress Cove Care Center	9.4 mi	Crystal River, FL	★★★★★	4/5
Timberridge Nursing & Rehabilitation Center	14.7 mi	Ocala, FL	★★★☆☆	2/5
Bridgewater Park Health & Rehabilitation Center	17.4 mi	Ocala, FL	★★★★☆	3/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Hernando →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 106036.

The Care File

Visit checklist — Grove Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center and Reh

124 W Norvell Bryant Hwy, Hernando, FL 34442 · 3522493100

Health inspection rating 2/5 · CMS overall 3/5· Fines (3y): $167,954

Most serious findings on record:

▲ May 2, 2025 (F-0684, Immediate jeopardy, one-off): The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
▲ May 2, 2025 (F-0835, Immediate jeopardy, one-off): The facility was not managed in a way that uses its money, staff, and resources effectively and efficiently to care for residents.
▲ May 2, 2025 (F-0867, Immediate jeopardy, one-off): The facility did not run an ongoing quality assurance committee that reviews care problems and creates plans to fix them.

Questions for the administrator:

☐ "How do you make sure each resident's care follows the doctor's orders, and what changed after this citation?"
☐ "What were the findings behind this administration citation, and what has leadership changed since?"
☐ "How does your quality committee work, and can you give an example of a problem it recently identified and fixed?"
☐ "Who completes resident assessments here, and how do you check them for accuracy?"
☐ "How do you identify and arrange specialized services for residents with mental health conditions or disabilities?"
☐ "Who is on the team that builds each resident's care plan, and how quickly is it in place after admission?"
☐ "How many residents here use oxygen or breathing equipment, and who checks that equipment each shift?"
☐ "What is your current medication error rate, and what have you changed to bring errors down?"
☐ "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
☐ "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"

While you're there, notice:

☐ Smell and cleanliness in hallways, not just the lobby
☐ How staff speak to residents; call lights answered promptly
☐ Residents up, dressed, and engaged (visit mealtimes and a weekend if you can)

Data: CMS Provider Data Catalog, version 2026-08-01 · CCN 106036 · Verify at medicare.gov/care-compare · Printed from The Care File (thecarefile.com)