90 Taunton Street, Wrentham, MA 02093 (opens Google Maps) · Norfolk County · (508) 384-7977· 144 certified beds · avg 121 residents/day · certified since Jul 1, 1990 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: ALLIANCE HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES (8 facilities, chain avg rating 3.8★)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Jul 17, 2024 · F-0689
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Jul 22, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
Showing the latest 3 of 21 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not conduct and document a facility-wide assessment of what staff, supplies, and resources it needs to care for its residents properly — during everyday operations, nights, weekends, and emergencies. F-0838
The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. F-0761
The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. F-0880
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 8, 2025 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not conduct and document a facility-wide assessment of what staff, supplies, and resources it needs to care for its residents properly — during everyday operations, nights, weekends, and emergencies. · F-0838 |
| Sep 8, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Sep 8, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Sep 8, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · F-0658 |
| Sep 8, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not educate residents and staff about COVID-19 vaccination, offer the vaccine to those eligible after that education, or properly document everyone's vaccination status. · F-0887 |
| Sep 8, 2025 | B · Potential for minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · F-0842 |
| Jul 17, 2024 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Jul 17, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · F-0580 |
| Jul 17, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | When a resident had a planned discharge, the facility did not make sure the necessary information was communicated to the resident and to the doctors or facility taking over their care. · F-0661 |
| Jul 17, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. · F-0758 |
| Mar 21, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Mar 21, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection. · F-0607 |
| Mar 21, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Mar 21, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not help a resident get vision and hearing services — such as eye exams, glasses, hearing tests, or hearing aids. · F-0685 |
| Mar 21, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Mar 21, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail. · F-0698 |
| Mar 21, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason. · F-0757 |
| Mar 21, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. · F-0760 |
| Mar 21, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · F-0842 |
| Mar 21, 2023 | C · Potential for minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not fully assess residents on time — a complete assessment of health, abilities, and needs is required when a resident is first admitted and at least once every 12 months after that. · F-0636 |
| Mar 21, 2023 | C · Potential for minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not update each resident's care assessment at least once every 3 months. These regular check-ins keep the resident's care plan matched to their current condition. · F-0638 |
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (4 → 6).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 11 | 0 | E |
| 2024 | 4 | 1 | G ▲ |
| 2025 | 6 | 0 | F |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
1 fine totaling $47,886.
Every penalty CMS publishes for this facility in the 3-year window is listed —none excluded. The count and the dollar total come from two different CMS datasets and agree for this facility. Penalties older than the window are dropped by CMS before publication, not by us.
| Date | Type | Amount / length |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 17, 2024 | Fine | $47,886 |
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Massachusetts avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 4.29 | 3.89 | 3.95 | top 22% in Massachusetts; top 29% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.52 | 0.65 | 0.69 | bottom 36% in Massachusetts; bottom 41% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.95 | 3.51 | 3.50 | top 20% in Massachusetts; top 25% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.38 | 0.46 | 0.48 | bottom 41% in Massachusetts; bottom 48% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 28.5 | 38.2 | 45.8 | top 21% in Massachusetts; top 12% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 36.8 | 42.6 | 42.9 | top 40% in Massachusetts; top 41% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.45, RN 0.54, weekend 4.09.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (4.45 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 4/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 2/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Alliance Health at Maples. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
Non profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alliance Health INC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 09/01/2022 |
| Alliance Health Management Services LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2022 |
| Alliance Health Management Services LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/31/2025 |
| Brunetti, Tammy | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2022 |
| Calkins, Andrew | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2022 |
| Corridan, Linda | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2022 |
| Dedham Institution for Savings | Organization | 5% or Greater Mortgage Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/31/2024 |
| Dhaliwal, Iqubal | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2022 |
| Dhaliwal, Iqubal | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/31/2025 |
| Grady, Francis | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/15/2013 |
| Grady, Francis | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/22/2016 |
| Grady, Francis | Individual | Individual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/08/2025 |
| Gray, Alfred | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2022 |
| Janisko, Jerome | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2022 |
| Jennings, Michael | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2022 |
| Jones, Erik | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2022 |
| Kemp, Paul | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2022 |
| Lavallee, Thomas | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2022 |
| Mourtzinos, Arthur | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2022 |
| Riley, James | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2022 |
Showing 20 of 24 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 4 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
CMS lists this facility under the chain Alliance Health & Human Services — 8 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Serenity Hill Nursing Center | 1.7 mi | Wrentham, MA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| The Gardens at Cedarwood | 3.3 mi | Franklin, MA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Mount St Rita Health Centre | 5.2 mi | Cumberland, RI | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Madonna Manor Nursing Home | 5.5 mi | North Attleboro, MA | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Medway Country Manor Skilled Nursing & Rehabilitat | 7.9 mi | Medway, MA | —/5 | SFF | |
| Garden Place Healthcare | 8.2 mi | Attleboro, MA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Foremost at Sharon LLC | 8.5 mi | Sharon, MA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Thomas Upham House | 8.5 mi | Medfield, MA | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Premier Healthcare at Harrington House | 8.7 mi | Walpole, MA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Woonsocket Health Center | 9.1 mi | Woonsocket, RI | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Adviniacare Oakland Grove LLC | 9.6 mi | Woonsocket, RI | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuseSFF |
| Life Care Center of Attleboro | 10.0 mi | Attleboro, MA | ★★★★★ | 5/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Norfolk, MA — 33 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 225476.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details