MichiganDearborn

Allegria Village

15101 Ford Rd, Dearborn, MI 48126 · Wayne County · 89 certified beds · avg 84 residents/day · certified since Apr 3, 2000

Part of chain: ATIED ASSOCIATES (12 facilities, chain avg rating 1.8★)

4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
1
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
4.27
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Mar 7, 2024 · F-0684 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.

Why it matters: Care that strays from doctor's orders or ignores the resident's wishes can lead to declining health and avoidable harm.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Mar 26, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (19)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Nov 20, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Nov 20, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · from a complaint
Nov 20, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. · from a complaint
Nov 20, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication.
Aug 22, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature. · from a complaint
Aug 22, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors. · from a complaint
Aug 22, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Aug 22, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility allowed residents to lose the ability to do daily activities — like bathing, dressing, and eating — when there was no medical reason for the decline. Good care helps residents keep the abilities they have.
Aug 22, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Aug 22, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
Aug 22, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not educate residents and staff about COVID-19 vaccination, offer the vaccine to those eligible after that education, or properly document everyone's vaccination status.
May 2, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint
Mar 7, 2024▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Mar 7, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · from a complaint
Aug 7, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not maintain an effective pest control program to prevent or deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
Aug 7, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Aug 7, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal. · from a complaint
Aug 7, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Aug 7, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (6 → 4).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202350F
2024101G ▲
202540D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityMichigan avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)4.274.323.95top 40% in Michigan; top 30% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.520.840.69bottom 20% in Michigan; bottom 40% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.753.793.50top 39% in Michigan; top 31% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.280.490.48bottom 24% in Michigan; bottom 28% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)63.244.145.8bottom 6% in Michigan; bottom 12% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)66.739.242.9bottom 10% in Michigan; bottom 15% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.99, RN 0.48, weekend 3.51. Staffing rating: 3/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 2/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Av Partners LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest09/30/2021
Firo Operator LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest40%09/30/2021
Sage HC Partners LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest09/30/2021
Sage Operations Mi LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest60%09/30/2021
Tennenbaum, SamuelIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest09/30/2021
Satt, AvrahamIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE05/04/2021
Scott, HeatherIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE09/30/2021

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Riverside Commons Rehab and Nursing Center, LLC1.9 miDearborn, MI★★★☆☆2/5
Fairlane Senior Care and Rehab Center2.0 miDetroit, MI★★★★☆4/5
Heritage Manor Nursing and Rehabilitation Center3.9 miDetroit, MI★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
Sheffield Manor Nursing & Rehabilitation Center5.1 miDetroit, MI★★★☆☆2/5abuse
Optalis Health and Rehabilitation of Dearborn Heig5.3 miDearborn Heights, MI★★☆☆☆2/5
The Orchards at Northwest5.6 miDetroit, MI★☆☆☆☆1/5
Boulevard Temple Care Center, LLC5.6 miDetroit, MI★★★☆☆3/5
Westwood Nursing Center5.8 miDetroit, MI★★★☆☆3/5
Optalis Health and Rehabilitation of Allen Park6.2 miAllen Park, MI★★★☆☆3/5
Hartford Nursing & Rehabilitation Center6.3 miDetroit, MI★★★☆☆2/5
Mission Point Nursing & Physical Rehabilitation Ce6.7 miDetroit, MI★★★☆☆2/5
Imperial, a Villa Center6.8 miDearborn Heights, MI★★☆☆☆2/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Dearborn →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 235593.