Farmington Village Nrsg

Name: Farmington Village Nrsg
Address: 701 SOUTH MAIN STREET, Farmington, IL, 61531, US
Telephone: 3092452408

701 South Main Street, Farmington, IL 61531 · Fulton County · 92 certified beds · avg 83 residents/day · certified since Aug 1, 1980

Part of chain: ATIED ASSOCIATES (12 facilities, chain avg rating 1.8★)

1/5

Health inspection rating (on-site)

Serious findings on record

$73,577

Fines, last 3 years

2.67

Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★☆☆☆☆1/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · May 1, 2026 · F-0689

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: May 21, 2026 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (28)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

Date	Severity	What the facility was cited for
May 1, 2026	▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-off	The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
May 1, 2026	F · Potential for harm, facility-wide	The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
May 1, 2026	F · Potential for harm, facility-wide	The facility did not have a working program to monitor how antibiotics are used. Tracking antibiotic use helps make sure these drugs are given only when needed and remain effective.
May 1, 2026	F · Potential for harm, facility-wide	The facility did not develop, carry out, or maintain an effective training program for all new and existing staff members.
May 1, 2026	F · Potential for harm, facility-wide	The facility did not develop or maintain an effective training program for its direct care staff, including training on how to communicate effectively with residents.
May 1, 2026	F · Potential for harm, facility-wide	The facility did not educate its staff on residents' rights and the facility's responsibilities toward residents. Staff can only respect rights they've been taught about.
May 1, 2026	F · Potential for harm, facility-wide	The facility did not train its staff on dementia care and on recognizing and reporting abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
May 1, 2026	F · Potential for harm, facility-wide	The facility did not give all staff the required training on its quality improvement program — the internal system for finding problems and making care better.
May 1, 2026	F · Potential for harm, facility-wide	The facility did not include required infection control training — with written standards, policies, and procedures — as part of its infection prevention program.
May 1, 2026	F · Potential for harm, facility-wide	The facility did not make sure its nurse aides had the skills needed to care for residents, including training in dementia care and abuse prevention.
May 1, 2026	F · Potential for harm, facility-wide	The facility did not provide its staff with required training on behavioral health — caring for residents with conditions like dementia, depression, or other mental health needs.
May 1, 2026	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
May 1, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
May 1, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility gave residents unnecessary mind-altering (psychotropic) medications, or used drugs in a way that restrained residents by dulling their ability to think, move, or function.
May 1, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility allowed residents to lose the ability to do daily activities — like bathing, dressing, and eating — when there was no medical reason for the decline. Good care helps residents keep the abilities they have.
May 1, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
May 1, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not serve meals and snacks at times that fit residents' needs, preferences, and requests, or did not offer nourishing alternatives for residents who want to eat outside scheduled meal times.
May 1, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.
May 29, 2025	F · Potential for harm, facility-wide	The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
May 29, 2025	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups.
May 29, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
May 29, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Apr 5, 2024	F · Potential for harm, facility-wide	The facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal.
Apr 5, 2024	F · Potential for harm, facility-wide	The facility did not give the resident or their representative written notice of how long it would hold the resident's bed during a hospital stay or approved leave.
Apr 5, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need.
Apr 5, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Apr 5, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Apr 5, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (4 → 18).

Year	Citations	Serious (G–L)	Worst severity that year
2024	6	0	F
2025	4	0	F
2026	18	1	J ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $73,577, plus 1 Medicare payment denial period.

Date	Type	Amount / length
May 1, 2026	Fine	$73,577
May 1, 2026	Payment Denial	16 days from May 26, 2026

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

Measure	This facility	Illinois avg	U.S. avg	Where it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)	2.67	2.99	3.95	top 50% in Illinois; bottom 6% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours	0.48	0.63	0.69	bottom 46% in Illinois; bottom 34% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing	2.26	2.67	3.50	bottom 39% in Illinois; bottom 4% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)	0.36	0.56	0.48	bottom 33% in Illinois; bottom 45% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)	39.7	44.5	45.8	top 37% in Illinois; top 35% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)	30.8	41.8	42.9	top 33% in Illinois; top 30% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.63, RN 0.65, weekend 3.07. Staffing rating: 2/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / manager	Type	Role	Stake	Since
Ray, Sherwin	Individual	5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest	30%	05/01/2022
Atied Associates LLC	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	01/13/2025
Extended Care Clinical LLC	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	05/01/2022
Extended Care Consulting LLC	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	05/01/2022
Martin, Erin	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	05/01/2022
Ray, Sherwin	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	01/13/2025
Roth & Co, LLP	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	01/08/2025
Vass, Jacob	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	01/26/2023
Vass, Jacob	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	01/26/2023

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

"What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
"What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
"Who oversees antibiotic use here, and how do you decide when an antibiotic is really needed?"
"What training do new hires get before working with residents, and what ongoing training do all staff receive?"
"What ongoing training do your direct care staff receive each year?"
"How and how often are staff trained on residents' rights?"
"What training do all staff get on dementia care and on spotting and reporting abuse?"
"How do frontline staff report care problems, and how does your quality improvement program act on them?"
"What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
"Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

Facility	Distance	City	Overall	Inspection	Flags
Loft Rehab & Nursing of Canton	6.9 mi	Canton, IL	★★☆☆☆	3/5
Renaissance Care Center	8.9 mi	Canton, IL	★★★★☆	3/5
Sunset Rehabilitation and Health Care	9.5 mi	Canton, IL	★☆☆☆☆	1/5
Graham Hospital	9.6 mi	Canton, IL	★★★☆☆	3/5
Clayberg, the	17.0 mi	Cuba, IL	★★★★★	5/5
Manor Court of Peoria	18.2 mi	Peoria, IL	★★★☆☆	3/5
Sharon Health Care Elms	19.2 mi	Peoria, IL	★☆☆☆☆	2/5
Sharon Health Care Willows	19.2 mi	Peoria, IL	★☆☆☆☆	2/5	abuse
Sharon Health Care Pines	19.2 mi	Peoria, IL	★☆☆☆☆	1/5	abuse

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Farmington →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 145404.

The Care File

Visit checklist — Farmington Village Nrsg

701 South Main Street, Farmington, IL 61531 · 3092452408

Health inspection rating 1/5 · CMS overall 2/5· Fines (3y): $73,577

Most serious findings on record:

▲ May 1, 2026 (F-0689, Immediate jeopardy, one-off): The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Questions for the administrator:

☐ "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
☐ "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
☐ "Who oversees antibiotic use here, and how do you decide when an antibiotic is really needed?"
☐ "What training do new hires get before working with residents, and what ongoing training do all staff receive?"
☐ "What ongoing training do your direct care staff receive each year?"
☐ "How and how often are staff trained on residents' rights?"
☐ "What training do all staff get on dementia care and on spotting and reporting abuse?"
☐ "How do frontline staff report care problems, and how does your quality improvement program act on them?"
☐ "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
☐ "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"

While you're there, notice:

☐ Smell and cleanliness in hallways, not just the lobby
☐ How staff speak to residents; call lights answered promptly
☐ Residents up, dressed, and engaged (visit mealtimes and a weekend if you can)

Data: CMS Provider Data Catalog, version 2026-08-01 · CCN 145404 · Verify at medicare.gov/care-compare · Printed from The Care File (thecarefile.com)