How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
15311 Schaefer Rd, Detroit, MI 48227 (opens Google Maps) · Wayne County · (313) 835-4775· 106 certified beds · avg 95 residents/day · certified since Oct 26, 1989 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Abuse citation flag (CMS)
Part of chain: CIENA HEALTHCARE/LAUREL HEALTH CARE (81 facilities, chain avg rating 2.8★)
The abuse flag means inspectors cited this facility for abuse that caused harm to a resident within the past year, or potential for harm in each of the last two years. Source: CMS.
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
▲ Actual harm, isolated · May 6, 2026 · F-0600 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.
Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: May 25, 2026 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
Showing the latest 3 of 17 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint F-0600
The facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors. F-0921
The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. F-0812
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| May 6, 2026 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint · F-0600 |
| Feb 26, 2026 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors. · F-0921 |
| Feb 26, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Feb 26, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · from a complaint · F-0550 |
| Feb 26, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · F-0609 |
| Feb 26, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · F-0610 |
| Feb 26, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Feb 26, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have enough support staff to safely and effectively run its food and nutrition service. · F-0802 |
| Feb 26, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Jan 23, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have a working program to monitor how antibiotics are used. Tracking antibiotic use helps make sure these drugs are given only when needed and remain effective. · F-0881 |
| Jan 23, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Dec 17, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Feb 7, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint · F-0609 |
| Nov 30, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint · F-0609 |
| Nov 30, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · from a complaint · F-0657 |
| Nov 30, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · F-0686 |
| Nov 30, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems. · F-0756 |
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (2 → 8).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 4 | 0 | D |
| 2024 | 2 | 0 | D |
| 2025 | 2 | 0 | E |
| 2026 | 9 | 1 | G ▲ |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Michigan avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 4.16 | 4.32 | 3.95 | top 46% in Michigan; top 34% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.19 | 0.84 | 0.69 | bottom 1% in Michigan; bottom 2% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.73 | 3.79 | 3.50 | top 41% in Michigan; top 32% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.10 | 0.49 | 0.48 | bottom 1% in Michigan; bottom 1% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 38.9 | 44.1 | 45.8 | top 34% in Michigan; top 34% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 71.4 | 39.2 | 42.9 | bottom 6% in Michigan; bottom 11% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.47, RN 0.16, weekend 3.11.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.47 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 3/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: —/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Sheffield Manor Nursing & Rehabilitation Center. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ciena Healthcare Management INC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2001 |
| Ciena Healthcare Management INC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/19/2025 |
| Deutsch, Neal | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/01/2009 |
| Gardina, Anna | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/01/2009 |
| Khan, Anis | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2001 |
| Khan, Anis | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2001 |
| Khan, Anis | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2001 |
| Maqsood, Zahid | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/12/2012 |
| Maqsood, Zahid | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/12/2012 |
| Mohammad a Qazi Living Trust Dated 09/26/97 | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2001 |
| Qazi, Mohammad | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2001 |
| Qazi, Mohammad | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2001 |
| Qazi, Mohammad | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2001 |
| Qazi, Mohammad | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2001 |
| Silverstone, Michael | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2025 |
| Silverstone, Michael | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2025 |
All 16 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
CMS lists this facility under the chain Ciena Healthcare/Laurel Health Care — 81 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 80 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Westwood Nursing Center | 0.7 mi | Detroit, MI | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| The Orchards at Northwest | 0.7 mi | Detroit, MI | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Hartford Nursing & Rehabilitation Center | 1.4 mi | Detroit, MI | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Oakpointe Senior Care and Rehab Center | 1.9 mi | Detroit, MI | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| The Villa at Great Lakes Crossing | 3.1 mi | Detroit, MI | ★★☆☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Regency Heights-Detroit | 3.1 mi | Detroit, MI | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Fairlane Senior Care and Rehab Center | 3.2 mi | Detroit, MI | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Heritage Manor Nursing and Rehabilitation Center | 3.4 mi | Detroit, MI | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| West Oaks Senior Care & Rehab Center | 4.0 mi | Detroit, MI | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| The Villa at the Park | 4.0 mi | Highland Park, MI | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Beaconshire Nursing Centre | 4.8 mi | Detroit, MI | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Allegria Village | 5.1 mi | Dearborn, MI | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Wayne, MI — 63 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 235492.
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details