MichiganDetroit

Fairlane Senior Care and Rehab Center

15750 Joy, Detroit, MI 48228 · Wayne County · 180 certified beds · avg 153 residents/day · certified since Apr 1, 1986

Part of chain: NEXCARE HEALTH SYSTEMS (20 facilities, chain avg rating 3.8★)

4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.99
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (15)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Sep 5, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors.
Sep 5, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups.
Sep 5, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services.
Sep 5, 2025B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility had resident rooms smaller than required — at least 80 square feet per person in shared rooms and 100 square feet in single rooms.
Jun 3, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential. · from a complaint
Sep 12, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility has more than 120 beds but did not hire a qualified full-time social worker as required.
Sep 12, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Sep 12, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services.
Sep 12, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide food that accounts for each resident's allergies, intolerances, and personal preferences, or did not offer appealing alternatives.
Sep 12, 2024B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility had resident rooms smaller than required — at least 80 square feet per person in shared rooms and 100 square feet in single rooms.
May 17, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. · from a complaint
Feb 6, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · from a complaint
Feb 6, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · from a complaint
Feb 6, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
Aug 10, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · from a complaint

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (5 → 4).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202310D
202490F
202550F

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityMichigan avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.994.323.95bottom 43% in Michigan; top 40% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.530.840.69bottom 21% in Michigan; bottom 42% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.573.793.50bottom 48% in Michigan; top 39% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.240.490.48bottom 17% in Michigan; bottom 20% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)40.844.145.8top 40% in Michigan; top 38% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)42.939.242.9bottom 43% in Michigan; bottom 49% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.56, RN 0.47, weekend 3.19. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Nexcare Holdings, LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%11/01/2013
Brown, LauettaIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE08/02/2018
Nexcare Health Systems, LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2005
Perry, MichaelIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2015
Sangster, ToddIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE11/04/2013

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Allegria Village2.0 miDearborn, MI★★★★☆4/5
Sheffield Manor Nursing & Rehabilitation Center3.2 miDetroit, MI★★★☆☆2/5abuse
Heritage Manor Nursing and Rehabilitation Center3.4 miDetroit, MI★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
The Orchards at Northwest3.6 miDetroit, MI★☆☆☆☆1/5
Riverside Commons Rehab and Nursing Center, LLC3.9 miDearborn, MI★★★☆☆2/5
Westwood Nursing Center3.9 miDetroit, MI★★★☆☆3/5
Hartford Nursing & Rehabilitation Center4.3 miDetroit, MI★★★☆☆2/5
Oakpointe Senior Care and Rehab Center5.1 miDetroit, MI★★★★★5/5
The Villa at Great Lakes Crossing5.2 miDetroit, MI★★☆☆☆3/5
Regency Heights-Detroit5.2 miDetroit, MI★★★☆☆3/5
West Oaks Senior Care & Rehab Center5.2 miDetroit, MI★★★★★5/5
Optalis Health and Rehabilitation of Dearborn Heig5.3 miDearborn Heights, MI★★☆☆☆2/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Detroit →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 235445.