2701 Richmond Drive NE, Albuquerque, NM 87107 (opens Google Maps) · Bernalillo County · (505) 967-4200· 47 certified beds · avg 45 residents/day · certified since Mar 10, 2009 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: ADVANCED HEALTH CARE (26 facilities, chain avg rating 4.8★)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
▲ Immediate jeopardy, isolated · Oct 21, 2024 · F-0580 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away.
Why it matters: A family could learn about a serious injury or decline days later, after the chance to act has passed.
Severity (J): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Nov 25, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Immediate jeopardy, isolated · Oct 21, 2024 · F-0760 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication.
Why it matters: A serious medication error can cause real harm, hospitalization, or worse.
Severity (J): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Nov 25, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Oct 21, 2024 · F-0684 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Why it matters: Care that strays from doctor's orders or ignores the resident's wishes can lead to declining health and avoidable harm.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Nov 25, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Dec 14, 2023 · F-0686
The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Why it matters: Bedsores are painful, can become deeply infected, and in serious cases can be life-threatening.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Jan 22, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
Showing the latest 3 of 15 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. F-0812
The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. F-0880
The facility did not enter each resident's assessment information into the required format and send it to the state within 7 days of completing the assessment, as the rules require. F-0640
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 27, 2025 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Mar 27, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Mar 27, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not enter each resident's assessment information into the required format and send it to the state within 7 days of completing the assessment, as the rules require. · F-0640 |
| Mar 27, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not serve meals and snacks at times that fit residents' needs, preferences, and requests, or did not offer nourishing alternatives for residents who want to eat outside scheduled meal times. · F-0809 |
| Oct 21, 2024 | ▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, isolated | The facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · from a complaint · F-0580 |
| Oct 21, 2024 | ▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, isolated | The facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. · from a complaint · F-0760 |
| Oct 21, 2024 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint · F-0684 |
| Dec 14, 2023 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · F-0686 |
| Dec 14, 2023 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Dec 14, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Dec 14, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Dec 14, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint · F-0880 |
| Oct 7, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · F-0658 |
| Oct 7, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Oct 7, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems. · F-0756 |
Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (5 → 4).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 3 | 0 | E |
| 2023 | 5 | 1 | G ▲ |
| 2024 | 3 | 3 | J ▲ |
| 2025 | 4 | 0 | F |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
3 fines totaling $39,880.
Every penalty CMS publishes for this facility in the 3-year window is listed —none excluded. The count and the dollar total come from two different CMS datasets and agree for this facility. Penalties older than the window are dropped by CMS before publication, not by us.
| Date | Type | Amount / length |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 21, 2024 | Fine | $17,135 |
| Jan 30, 2024 | Fine | $6,774 |
| Dec 14, 2023 | Fine | $15,971 |
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | New Mexico avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.62 | 3.94 | 3.95 | bottom 38% in New Mexico; bottom 42% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.78 | 0.70 | 0.69 | top 38% in New Mexico; top 29% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.11 | 3.46 | 3.50 | bottom 29% in New Mexico; bottom 37% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.88 | 0.46 | 0.48 | top 6% in New Mexico; top 9% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 50.0 | 53.3 | 45.8 | top 36% in New Mexico; bottom 38% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 18.2 | 53.6 | 42.9 | top 5% in New Mexico; top 12% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.84, RN 1.05, weekend 4.16.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (4.84 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 3/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: —/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Advanced Health Care of Albuquerque. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Advanced Health Care - Larry H Miller Corporation | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | — | 01/01/2021 |
| New Ahc Holdings, LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | — | 01/01/2021 |
| The Bryan Miller Utah Dynasty Trust Dated April 22, 2014 | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2024 |
| The G&H Miller Utah Trust Dated February 26, 2019 | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2024 |
| The Gail Miller GST Trust | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 72% | 01/01/2024 |
| Hansen, Ralph | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/07/2025 |
| Hazen, Kyle | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/09/2026 |
| Hazen, Kyle | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2026 |
| LHMSH LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2024 |
| New Ahc Holdings, LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/12/2025 |
| Oxnam, Nathan | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2024 |
| S&S Nutrition Network INC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2025 |
All 12 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
CMS lists this facility under the chain Advanced Health Care — 26 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 25 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Odelia Healthcare | 1.4 mi | Albuquerque, NM | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Spanish Trails Wellness & Rehabilitation | 1.8 mi | Albuquerque, NM | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Albuquerque Heights Healthcare and Rehabilitation | 1.9 mi | Albuquerque, NM | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Manzano Del Sol by Purehealth | 2.1 mi | Albuquerque, NM | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Princeton Health & Rehabilitation | 3.0 mi | Albuquerque, NM | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Uptown Rehabilitation Center | 3.1 mi | Albuquerque, NM | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| The Rehabilitation Center of Albuquerque | 3.4 mi | Albuquerque, NM | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Sandia Ridge Center | 3.4 mi | Albuquerque, NM | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | SFF |
| Canyon Transitional Rehabilitation Center, LLC | 4.7 mi | Albuquerque, NM | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Las Palomas Center | 5.1 mi | Albuquerque, NM | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuseSFF |
| Fiesta Park Wellness & Rehabilitation | 5.3 mi | Albuquerque, NM | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| La Vida Llena | 5.3 mi | Albuquerque, NM | ★★★☆☆ | 4/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Bernalillo, NM — 18 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 325119.
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details