MinnesotaRed Wing

St Crispin Living Community

213 Pioneer Road, Red Wing, MN 55066 · Goodhue County · 64 certified beds · avg 57 residents/day · certified since Mar 1, 1987

Part of chain: BENEDICTINE HEALTH SYSTEM (23 facilities, chain avg rating 2.8★)

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
2
Serious findings on record
$138,989
Fines, last 3 years
4.21
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Mar 2, 2026 · F-0755 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.

Why it matters: Weak pharmacy services lead to medication mistakes, delays, and missed drug interactions that can seriously harm residents.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Mar 24, 2026 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Aug 7, 2024 · F-0684 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.

Why it matters: Care that strays from doctor's orders or ignores the resident's wishes can lead to declining health and avoidable harm.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Aug 30, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (18)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Mar 19, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility gave residents unnecessary mind-altering (psychotropic) medications, or used drugs in a way that restrained residents by dulling their ability to think, move, or function.
Mar 19, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Mar 19, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Mar 19, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.
Mar 19, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have a working program to monitor how antibiotics are used. Tracking antibiotic use helps make sure these drugs are given only when needed and remain effective.
Mar 2, 2026▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint
Mar 2, 2026F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility admitted a resident without a doctor's order, or did not make sure each resident stayed under a doctor's ongoing care. · from a complaint
Mar 2, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Mar 2, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it. · from a complaint
Feb 27, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not keep all essential equipment working safely — things like heating and cooling systems, kitchen equipment, and medical devices.
Feb 27, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Aug 7, 2024▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Dec 7, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate.
Dec 7, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Dec 7, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Dec 7, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.
Dec 7, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide necessary behavioral health care and services — support for residents' mental and emotional wellbeing, including conditions like depression and anxiety.
Dec 7, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (2 → 5).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202360D
202411J ▲
202520F
202691J ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $138,989, plus 1 Medicare payment denial period.

DateTypeAmount / length
Aug 7, 2024Fine$138,989
Aug 7, 2024Payment Denial1 days from Aug 29, 2024

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityMinnesota avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)4.214.833.95bottom 25% in Minnesota; top 32% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours1.251.220.69top 38% in Minnesota; top 8% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.774.273.50bottom 28% in Minnesota; top 30% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.700.690.48top 37% in Minnesota; top 16% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)38.642.245.8top 46% in Minnesota; top 33% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)27.838.642.9top 36% in Minnesota; top 25% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.76, RN 1.11, weekend 3.36. Staffing rating: 5/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5

Who owns this facility

Non profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Benedictine Health SystemOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2012
Benson, JeffreyIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE08/06/2014
Bergien, TriciaIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2017
Carley, GeraldIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/03/2018
Hack, TaylarIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2022
Hoel, DavidIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE12/31/2004
Lafavor, EileenIndividualContracted Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE08/15/2022
Pearson, LynetteIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2021
Rymanowski, KevinIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE11/10/2015

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Mayo Clinic Health System - Lake City12.8 miLake City, MN★★★☆☆2/5abuse
Ellsworth Health Services14.2 miEllsworth, WI★★★★★5/5
Plum City Care Ctr17.4 miPlum City, WI★★★★★4/5
Zumbrota Care Center18.2 miZumbrota, MN★★★☆☆2/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Red Wing →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 245449.